Friday, 20 March 2026

USE THE MILKSHAKE THEORY TO UNDERSTAND GOLD’S RECENT BEHAVIOUR

20 March 2026

MILKSHAKE TO UNDERSTAND GOLD'S RECENT BAD BEHAVIOUR


Gold has weakened not because its story has failed, but because war has driven a surge in the dollar and a scramble for liquidity. 

That has forced investors to sell gold first, then reprice senior miners as pressured businesses, and finally abandon junior miners as speculative bets. 

The same forces may later result in massive money printing which will undermine confidence in fiat currencies, setting the stage for gold's recovery.


1. THE WAR – THE TRUE FIRST DOMINO

At the heart of the recent move is not gold, nor the dollar, it is the war.

War introduces three immediate shocks. Energy prices surge. Risk rises sharply. Capital seeks safety.

Oil above 100 dollars feeds directly into global inflation and into the cost base of industries like mining (mining is highly energy intensive). At the same time, uncertainty forces investors to reduce exposure to risk and move capital into the most liquid and trusted asset in the system, the US dollar.

So the correct starting point is this.

War → energy shock → risk shock → flight to safety

Everything else follows.

Geopolitical shock — a sudden conflict or political event that disrupts markets and economic expectations.


2. THE MILKSHAKE THEORY – TWO CORE SYMPTOMS

The Dollar Milkshake Theory (Brent Johnson) explains what happens next.

It can be reduced to two observable symptoms.

First, a surging US dollar. The dollar is surging because of the war. In times of stress, global capital moves into dollar assets because they are liquid, deep, and perceived as safe.

Second, a global dollar shortage. Much of the world is indebted in dollars. As the dollar rises, those debts become more expensive to service. And borrowers have to obtain dollars at any cost.

This creates forced selling across global markets of easily liquidated assets gold being the first choice. 

So the mechanism is simple.

Dollar up → global stress → forced selling of gold to meet dollar commitments. 

Dollar Milkshake Theory — the idea that global capital is drawn into the US dollar ( america is the boy sucking milkshake from the carton up through a straw), creating strength in USD and stress elsewhere.

Liquidity — the ease with which an asset can be converted into cash quickly without significantly affecting its price.


3. WHY GOLD FALLS – THE LIQUIDITY PHASE

Gold’s decline sits inside this framework.

Gold is priced in dollars. When the dollar rises, the price of gold measured in dollars tends to fall. Not because gold has changed, but because the measuring unit has strengthened (it takes fewer dollars to buy the same block of gold) .

More importantly, investors facing dollar liabilities must raise cash. Gold is highly liquid and has performed well, so it becomes a natural source of funds.

So even the safe haven is sold.

This explains the paradox.

War risk rising. Inflation rising. Yet gold falling.

The sequence is clear.

Dollar up → liquidity stress → gold sold → gold weakens temporarily

Liquidity stress — when investors are forced to sell assets to raise cash.


4. SENIOR MINERS – THE DOUBLE HIT

Senior miners are hit next, and harder.

They are not gold. They are businesses.

First, they suffer from the fall in gold prices. The capital value of unmined invenriry falls. And lower expected revenue feeds directly into lower expected profits. But that's not all. 

Second, they suffer from rising energy costs. Mining is energy-intensive. Higher oil prices squeeze margins immediately.

Third, they are equities. In a risk-off environment, fund managers sell liquid shares first. Senior miners are large, liquid, and easy to exit.

So they face a double, even a triple impact.

Lower gold + higher costs + equity de-risking. 

No surprise then that they fall more than gold itself.

Operational leverage — when profits are highly sensitive to changes in revenue and costs.


5. JUNIOR MINERS – THE COLLAPSE PHASE

Junior miners come last, and fall the most.

They are not producing assets, they are speculative ideas. They are future projects.

Their value depends on funding, future production, and long-term expectations. When interest rates rise and risk appetite disappears, those future expectations are heavily discounted.

At the same time, as capital becomes scarce, funding dries up and projects stall.

So juniors are hit by both valuation and financing pressure.

This is where the decline becomes extreme.

Discount rate — the rate used to value future profits today; higher rates reduce present value. A net present value NPV calculation where the discount rate is used to bring future profits year by year back to a present value. 

Duration — sensitivity to distant future cash flows.


6. THE FULL CHAIN – FROM WAR TO COLLAPSE

The entire mechanism now becomes clear.

War → energy spike → inflation pressure → risk-off sentiment
→ flight to safety → dollar surge
→ global dollar shortage → forced selling
→ gold sold for liquidity → gold weakens

Then:

Gold weakens + oil rises + rates stay high
→ mining margins questioned → senior miners sold

Then:

Funding tightens + discount rates rise
→ junior miners collapse

The Milkshake Theory is therefore the transmission mechanism, not the root cause. The war is the catalyst.

But it's not over yet... 


7. FIAT CONFIDENCE – WHY GOLD RISES LATER

There is a second phase.

The same forces that strengthen the dollar in the short term can weaken confidence in fiat over time. This is how it works. 

To stabilise the system, central banks may be forced to provide liquidity. This can mean expanding balance sheets or accommodating fiscal pressures created by war and higher energy costs.

In simple terms, more money may need to be created (digitally printed, some form of QE) to hold the system together.

This is what the the debasement trade is all about.

So the sequence evolves.

Short term: dollar strength dominates
Long term: currency dilution becomes visible to investors. 

That is when gold reasserts itself, as a hedge against the inflation caused when the money supply is expanded.

Fiat currency — money issued by governments without intrinsic or physical backing of real assets such as gold or commodities or quality real estate, only a promise to pay from the government.

Debasement — reduction in the value of a currency through increased supply.


8. THE CRITICAL INSIGHT – TIMING, NOT DIRECTION

The key insight is timing. This is important to understand. 

Phase 1: War, dollar surge, liquidity stress, gold falls
Phase 2: Economic strain, high costs, miners collapse
Phase 3: Policy response, fiat concerns, gold rises

We are currently in Phase 2.

This is why the move feels counterintuitive. The drivers that will ultimately support gold are, in the short term, suppressing it.


9. BOTTOM LINE

The decline in gold and miners is not a contradiction. It is a sequence.

War has triggered an energy shock and a flight to safety. The dollar has surged. Liquidity has tightened. Gold has been sold. Senior miners have been repriced as stressed businesses. Junior miners have been crushed as speculative assets.

But beneath this, the longer-term pressures on fiat are building. This looks like a dip or be it very serious dip in a long-term story of momentum. So the advice of this writer is don't panic, don't sell, if you have spare cash buy on the dip (agreed, timing the bottom of the The Dip is difficult). 

So what looks like weakness may be the early stage of a much larger move still to come.

GOLD MINERS COLLAPSE

20 March 2026

GOLD MINERS COLLAPSE



1. GOLD FALLS FIRST – LIQUIDITY BEFORE LOGIC

Gold has weakened not because its long-term case has failed, but because the financial system is under short-term stress.

The dollar has strengthened, making gold more expensive globally. Interest rates remain high, increasing the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset. At the same time, investors have been forced to sell gold to raise cash and cover positions elsewhere.

This is the classic pattern. In a crisis, liquidity dominates fundamentals. Gold is sold first, even if it is later the ultimate beneficiary of the same crisis.

Glossary: Dollar squeeze — a global rush to obtain dollars, forcing asset sales.


2. SENIOR MINERS – LEVERAGE WORKS BOTH WAYS

Senior miners fall more than gold because they are businesses, not money.

When gold drops, their margins compress. When oil rises, their costs increase. When interest rates stay high, their future profits are discounted more heavily. And when markets turn risk-off, fund managers sell liquid equities first.

So the senior miner is hit from every angle at once. Lower revenue expectations, higher costs, tighter financial conditions, and broad equity selling.

This is why they behave like leveraged gold on the way up, and like cyclical stocks on the way down.

Glossary: Operational leverage — profits move more sharply than revenues due to fixed costs.


3. JUNIOR MINERS – WHERE VALUATION COLLAPSES

Juniors are not smaller seniors. They are future promises.

Most have little or no current cash flow. Their value depends on future discoveries, future production, and future funding. When interest rates rise and capital becomes scarce, those future expectations are heavily discounted.

At the same time, investor psychology turns. Speculative capital retreats first. Liquidity disappears. Prices fall fast and far beyond fundamentals.

This is why juniors collapse hardest. They are long-duration, high-risk assets in a market that suddenly wants safety and cash.

Glossary: Duration — dependence on distant future cash flows.


4. THE REAL STORY – GOLD VS THE SYSTEM

Here is the key distinction.

Gold sits outside the system. It has no counterparty, no management, no cost base.

Miners sit inside the system. They depend on energy, finance, governments, and functioning markets.

So when the system is under stress, investors can prefer gold while rejecting miners. That is not a contradiction. It is a hierarchy of trust.

Physical gold is money. Mining shares are risk assets.

Glossary: Counterparty risk — risk that another party fails to honour an obligation.


5. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT – THE SEQUENCE

The recovery, if it comes, follows a sequence.

Gold stabilises first as liquidity stress eases. Senior miners follow as margins become clearer and valuations look cheap. Juniors recover last, when risk appetite and funding conditions return.

And when juniors move, they tend to move violently.

Glossary: Risk-off — investors shifting away from risk towards safety.


6. BOTTOM LINE

The market is not rejecting gold. It is repricing risk.

Gold is being sold for liquidity. Seniors are being sold as cyclical equities under pressure. Juniors are being abandoned as speculative, long-duration bets.

This is not the end of the gold story. It is the system tightening before the next phase unfolds.

HOW DOES AMERICA CONTROL ITS VASSALS

20 March 2026

How to recruit, retain and control your vassals

The strategy for recruiting, holding, and controlling proxy states, or "vassals," involves several key almost Mafia-type mechanisms:

1. Political Capture: This is achieved through significant financial influence, such as lobbying money and campaign donations, as well as threats to the elected status or health of the candidate, and "soft power" generally, which ensures that political systems and leaders align with US interests. The US also influences government formation and captures intelligence services within these states.

2. Security Integration and Training: The US builds up and partially runs the internal security apparatus of these states, trains and arms specific military or paramilitary groups, provides ISR, to exert control and enforce desired policies and actions.

3. Information Control: Funding NGOs and controlling a significant portion of the media in these proxy states helps shape public opinion and maintain influence, preventing dissent or independent decision-making.

4. Strategic Exploitation: Proxies are used as expendable fronts to absorb conflict, blame, and retaliatory damage, allowing the US to advance its geopolitical objectives while maintaining plausible deniability. Their resources are also exploited to serve US interests.



THE RETURN OF THE GREAT GAME - MAKING SENSE OF AMERICAN GOALS AND STRATEGIES

20 March 2026

THE RETURN OF THE GREAT GAME - MAKING SENSE OF AMERICAN GOALS AND STRATEGIES
Iran is a step on the road to throttling China and America's maintaining global dominance 

A crisis is unfolding. America escalates, Europe pays, Russia benefits, China awaits. Slowly, America's long-term goal and strategies becomes visible to us.

Overview
A war that looks chaotic may in fact have an elaborate structure and careful detailled planning. The peoples of Europe are beginning to notice and wake up to their dilemma, but it may already be too late.



1. Stage Three And Rising Fear

Professor Robert Pape warns that we are entering stage 3 of 5 in escalation against Iran. Stage 3 is already scaring the bejesus out of most of us.

If stage 3 already feels extreme, then stages 4 and 5 move into territory that could engulf entire regions and possibly the globe. This is not a limited conflict. It is a ladder, and each rung increases risk exponentially.

What makes this alarming is not just the military dimension, but the systemic exposure. Energy markets, supply chains, and financial systems are all tightly coupled. A disruption in the Gulf spreads quickly into oil and gas price hikes, inflation, recession, and social fragmentation worldwide.

What's happening is is global loss, but we do not see any rational objective here. What is going on? 

Glossary
Escalation laddera structured sequence of conflict stages where each step increases intensity and risk
Systemic riskrisk that spreads across interconnected systems rather than remaining localised, becoming uncontrollable. 


2. Europe Caught Between Freedom and Security 

Into this comes the Belgian Prime Minister’s complaint. Europe is funding the war in Ukraine, yet is absent from negotiations.

The phrase “it is not normal” is revealing. It signals not outrage, but a slightly pathetic recognition of Europe's weakness.

Europe finds itself in a structurally subordinate position. It contributes financially and bears economic consequences, yet strategic decisions are taken elsewhere. This is not an accident. It reflects the architecture of NATO and the post war Atlantic system.

In practical terms, Europe is exposed to:

  • Energy shocks
  • Refugee flows
  • Economic disruption

Yet it lacks any decisive influence over war termination. It is divided, irresolute, lacks military force, is paralysed and excluded from a say in its future. 

This makes it illegitimate as far as the peoples are concerned. If you pay, you expect a voice. If you do not have a voice, you do not have sovereignty.

Glossary
Strategic autonomythe ability of a state or bloc to make independent defence and foreign policy decisions
Vassalisationa condition where a state retains formal independence but lacks real strategic control


3. Orbán And The Geography Problem

Viktor Orbán cuts through the rhetoric with a blunt observation: Russia is permanent.

Geography does not change with ideology. Europe sits next to Russia. Energy flows, trade routes, and security realities follow that grounded fact.

Orbán’s argument is therefore structural and realistic, not ideological. Stability requires integration, not eternal exclusion. Security cannot be built indefinitely against a neighbour that cannot be moved... Or you get is instability. 

This reflects an older European logic. Balance of power rather than permanent confrontation.

  • Geography pushes Europe toward Russia
  • Security pulls Europe towards America

This contradiction sits at the heart of Europe’s dilemma.

Glossary
Security architecturethe framework of alliances and institutions that shape regional stability
Balance of powera system where states maintain equilibrium to prevent dominance by any single power


4. The American Strategy Revealed

Now let's step back and join the dots on the longer timeline.

Three key reference points:

  • Wesley Clark, 2007 – sequential regime change thinking
  • Brookings, 2009 – structured options to weaken Iran
  • RAND, 2019 – methods to extend Russia

Individually, these are policy discussions, that seen as a whole they form a pattern.

The Glenn Diesen - Brian Berletic discussion makes the link explicit. Policy papers are not abstract. They are blueprints that evolve into strategy, doctrine, operations and action. 

The pattern suggests:

  • Target regional powers
  • Prevent consolidation across Eurasia
  • Apply pressure through proxies*, sanctions, and war

This aligns closely with an updated version of Mackinder’s classic geopolitical thesis. Control or fragment Eurasia, and global dominance follows:

Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland;
who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island;
who rules the World-Island commands the world.

Glossary
Grand strategylong term coordination of military, economic and political tools to achieve dominance
Mackinder theorythe idea that control of Eurasia determines global power

ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) - the systematic collection and analysis of information about an adversary through observation, monitoring, and data gathering, used to guide military decisions and targeting


5. The Multipolar Threat And The Rise of China

The deeper layer is China. Brian Berletic highlights a critical point. The ultimate constraint on US dominance is the rise of China as a fully integrated industrial, financial, and energy independent power.

From this we can understand why :

  • Iran matters as an energy node
  • Russia matters as a strategic and resource base
  • The importance of The Middle East in providing the primary input to industry 
  • Eurasia as an integrated system 

Disrupt these, and China’s rise slows.

The strategy described is not simply about individual conflicts, it is about preventing and disrupting the emergence of a coherent alternative system.

Energy is central - restrict energy flows and you will restrict growth. Target infrastructure, and you reshape global trade. The ultimate aim is to throttle Chinese growth and stall a multi polar world. 

This is geoeconomics at scale.

Glossary
Multipolar worlda global system with several major centres of power rather than one dominant state
Geoeconomicsthe use of economic tools such as energy, trade, and sanctions to achieve geopolitical goals


6. Continuity Across Presidencies

One of the most striking observations is continuity.

From Bush to Obama to Trump, the trajectory remains pretty consistent - tactics may change, rhe language used certainly changes, but the direction persists. 

This raises an uncomfortable question about democracy.

If strategic outcomes remain stable regardless of electoral change, then where does real power sit... Not with the people?

Brian Berletic suggests that:

  • Corporate and financial interests, through lobby groups, shape long term policy
  • Think tanks develop frameworks
  • Governments implement variations of the same agenda

The reality is of very limited choices at the urns, the breaking of campaign promises, the continuity across the electoral cycles.

Glossary
Policy continuitythe persistence of strategic direction across different political administrations
Think tankan organisation that produces policy research and strategic recommendations


7. Europe’s Strategic Trap

Europe now faces a narrow choice that can be resumed to a choice between freedom or security.

Remain aligned with the Atlantic system and accept limited sovereignty; or attempt strategic independence and accept higher risk.

Constraints are real:

  • Military dependence on the US
  • Fragmented political structure and EU impotence 
  • Energy vulnerability

This is why many complaints continually emerge but change does not follow.

Europe is too large to ignore, but too divided to act independently, with the result being paralysis. And the EU leadership knows this but can do nothing. 

Glossary
Dependency structurea system where one actor relies on another for critical capabilities
Strategic paralysisinability to act decisively due to conflicting objectives or constraints


8. The Emerging Inflection Point

The United States may be pushing multiple fronts simultaneously - surely Iran, Russia, and China represent a scale of challenge that stretches resources too far.

History suggests that empires often fail not from defeat, but from debt, overreach abroad and fragmentation at home.

If that is the case, a turning point may come where:

  • Costs exceed benefits
  • Allies question alignment
  • Multipolar structures strengthen faster than they can be disrupted

At that point, Europe may find space to reposition itself, though this requires a general awakening. 

Glossary
Overextensiona condition where a power stretches its resources beyond sustainable limits
Inflection point a moment where a trend changes direction or accelerates rapidly


9. Bottom Line

This is the core reality.

America seeks to preserve its primacy.
China rises.
Russia resists.
Iran takes the pressure and escalates.
Europe hesitates.

And the world moves, step by step, up an escalation ladder, with America falling into an "escalation trap", as Robert Pape calls it.

The tragedy is that what seems like a completely irrational and utterly pointless War, may be entirely logical within the system that created it.


10. References

Why Iran GROUND INVASION IS Likely COMING (Robert Pape interview)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfyllo2Qiq8

Europe Paying For War But Not At The Table (Sebastian commentary on De Wever and Orbán)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPEXMGCfws8

Glenn Diesen Interviews Brian Berletic On US Strategy And Multipolar War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rHhRNaH9LI

Gen Wesley Clark Weighs Presidential Bid And Discusses US War Plans (Democracy Now, 2 March 2007)
https://www.democracynow.org/2007/3/2/gen_wesley_clark_weighs_presidential_bid

Which Path To Persia? Options For A New American Strategy Toward Iran (Brookings Institution, 2009)
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/which-path-to-persia-options-for-a-new-american-strategy-toward-iran/

Which Path To Persia? Full Report PDF (Brookings Institution, June 2009)
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_iran_strategy.pdf

Extending Russia: Competing From Advantageous Ground (RAND Corporation, 2019)
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3063.html

Extending Russia Full Report PDF (RAND Corporation, 2019)
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf

De Wever Confirms Support For Ukraine While Questioning Europe’s Role (The Brussels Times, 2026)
https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/2031297/de-wever-confirms-100-belgian-support-for-ukraine

No Appetite In EU For Renewed Energy Deals With Russia, Kallas Says (Reuters, 17 March 2026)
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/no-appetite-eu-energy-deals-with-russia-kallas-says-2026-03-17/

Orbán: Russia Should Remain Part Of Europe’s Security, Energy And Trade Systems (Novinite, 2026)
https://www.novinite.com/articles/237577/Orban%3A%2BRussia%2BShould%2BRemain%2BPart%2Bof%2BEurope%E2%80%99s%2BSecurity%2C%2BEnergy%2C%2Band%2BTrade%2BSystems

Orbán Says Russia Must Be Included In Europe’s Future Systems (TASS, 2026)
https://tass.com/world/2103567


Wednesday, 18 March 2026

IRAN WAR REALITIES

18 March 2026

IRAN WAR REALITIES: POWER, PERCEPTIONS AND THE GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES


https://www.youtube.com/live/btfqR-LV7sk?si=OwfSXExqZSp4K9cf

https://youtu.be/Q3Hy-qVJB6A?si=3OaBmsu-Q1qmNZtL


A long-standing narrative casts Iran as the central threat in West Asia and globally, yet the deeper reality is that rivalry with Israel has been the cause of global insecurity since the start of the Cold War, when both emerged as competing regional powers. 

The present conflict which started on 28th February reveals a stark asymmetry. Iran cannot strike the American homeland, yet it holds decisive leverage over global energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran is targeting the global economy rather than seeking outright military victory.

For the United States, Netanyahu played a psychologically thrilling a game by selling Donald Trump the idea that a fight with Iran would produce a quick, clean and decisive outcome. In fact Netanyahu, understanding Trump's psychology, laid a strategic trap . For Israel, even partial degradation of Iran may already constitute success as it would set a random back a decade. 

Meanwhile, inside Iran, war is likely to strengthen hardline control rather than weaken the regime.

The result is a familiar but dangerous pattern. Military action intended to resolve instability instead deepens it, with consequences extending far beyond the region into global markets, political alignments, and the balance of power itself.


1. Why There Has Been Persistent Hostility Towards Iran

Iran and Israel were not always enemies. For decades, Iran was central to Israel’s security architecture, supplying oil and acting as a key non-Arab ally. This aligned with Israel’s strategy of balancing hostile Arab states through peripheral alliances.

The rupture came with the 1979 revolution. However, the decisive shift into sustained hostility occurred after the Cold War. With the Soviet Union gone and Arab nationalism weakened, Iran and Israel emerged as rival regional powers.

At that point, Israeli leadership, including figures such as Benjamin Netanyahu, actively pushed Washington to reframe Iran as a primary threat. The narrative that Iran was perpetually “two years away” from a nuclear weapon dates from this period.

From this perspective, hostility was not inevitable. It was constructed to maintain Israel’s strategic relevance in US foreign policy and to block any rapprochement between Washington and Tehran.

Geostrategicrelating to power shaped by geography and regional positioning
Rapprochementrestoration of relations between previously hostile states
Threat Inflationexaggerating a danger to justify policy or action


2. Whether Iran Is Truly The World’s Leading Sponsor Of Terrorism

The claim rests heavily on how “terrorism” is defined. If it means supporting groups opposed by the United States or Israel, then Iran fits the label.

If it means sponsoring attacks like 9/11 or operations in Europe and America, the evidence is weak. In fact, much of that activity has historically been linked to Sunni jihadist networks, often with roots in US-aligned Gulf states.

The credibility of the “terrorism list” itself is questioned. Groups have been removed after lobbying campaigns, despite histories of violence, and later used in operations aligned with Western or Israeli interests.

The conclusion is blunt. The label functions as a political tool rather than a consistent analytical category.

Terrorismuse of violence against civilians for political aims
Proxy Groupsnon-state actors supported by states to pursue strategic goals
Political Labellingassigning labels to shape perception rather than reflect reality


3. Whether The Iranian Population Supports The Regime

Support for the Iranian system is limited but far from negligible. Around 15–20% form a highly committed base, numbering in the tens of millions.

A second group, often younger, is strongly opposed and increasingly radicalised by failed reform efforts.

The decisive factor is the large middle. This group does not support the regime but rejects regime change imposed through foreign bombing or invasion.

This middle bloc prevents collapse. It blocks both internal revolution and external overthrow, ensuring continuity despite dissatisfaction.

Theocracypolitical system governed by religious authority
Reform Failureinability of gradual change to meet public expectations
Middle Majoritylarge non-aligned segment stabilising a system


4. Why War Strengthens Rather Than Weakens Iran

External attack does not fragment Iran. It consolidates it.

War energises regime supporters and shifts power towards hardline institutions such as the Revolutionary Guard. Even critics of the regime resist foreign intervention.

The likely outcome is not regime collapse but a more repressive and centralised state. War eliminates moderates and empowers those arguing that compromise with the West is futile.

Rally Effectpopulation unites under external threat
Hardline Consolidationstrengthening of authoritarian factions during conflict
Repressionincreased control over political and social life


5. Whether The War Was A Miscalculation

The argument is asymmetric.

From Israel’s perspective, particularly under Netanyahu, the objective was not necessarily regime change. It was to degrade Iran and permanently block US–Iran diplomacy. Even a partial setback for Iran counts as success.

From the US perspective, the operation appears as a strategic miscalculation. It assumed rapid collapse, underestimated Iranian resilience, and failed to define a viable endgame.

This creates a divergence. What is a tactical success for Israel becomes a strategic trap for the United States.

Strategic Divergence allies pursuing different end goals
Degradationweakening an adversary without defeating it
Endgamedefined objective and exit strategy in conflict


6. The Role Of Trump And Political Psychology

Donald Trump’s decision-making is framed as highly outcome-driven. He avoids prolonged, messy conflicts but is receptive to actions framed as quick, decisive victories.

This creates an opening. By presenting Iran as weak and near collapse, advocates of war made the operation appear low-risk and high-reward.

Previous decisions reinforced this pattern. Moves such as recognising Jerusalem or killing Soleimani did not trigger immediate catastrophe, reinforcing a belief in consequence-free escalation.

The result was overconfidence. The expectation of rapid Iranian capitulation proved false, leaving no coherent Plan B beyond continued bombing.

Overconfidence Biasoverestimating likelihood of success
Strategic Framingpresenting actions in a way that influences decisions
Plan B Failureabsence of fallback strategy when initial assumptions fail


7. Whether The United States Is Acting Independently

The analysis is blunt.

Statements from US officials indicate that Washington entered the conflict partly because Israeli actions made retaliation likely. Instead of restraining escalation, the US chose to join it.

This suggests a reactive posture. Rather than controlling the timeline, the US allowed Israeli decisions to shape its own involvement.

The implication is uncomfortable. US policy appears influenced, if not driven, by Israeli strategic priorities rather than independent assessment of American interests.

Strategic Autonomyability of a state to act independently in its own interest
Escalation Entrapmentbeing drawn into conflict by an ally’s actions
Policy Captureexternal influence shaping national decision-making


8. Control Of The Strait Of Hormuz

Iran’s strongest leverage is not symbolic but economic.

Control over the Strait of Hormuz allows Iran to disrupt global oil flows. Countries seeking passage have negotiated directly with Tehran, not Washington, indicating where practical control lies.

Military options to reopen the strait carry high risk. US naval forces would need to enter missile range, exposing them to significant losses.

This shifts the balance. Iran may lack global reach, but it controls a critical node in the global system.

Chokepointnarrow passage controlling major trade flows
Maritime Denialpreventing access to sea routes
Leverageability to influence outcomes through control of key assets


9. The Real Battlefield: The Global Economy

Iran is not primarily trying to defeat Israel militarily.

Instead, it targets the most vulnerable pressure point: the global economy. By disrupting Gulf energy flows and regional production, it creates cascading economic damage.

Estimates already indicate severe contractions in Gulf economies, with knock-on effects across Asia and beyond. Fuel shortages and disruptions are appearing within weeks.

This is strategic logic. Economic pain is faster and more decisive than military attrition.

Economic Warfareusing economic disruption as a weapon
Shock Transmissionrapid spread of economic disruption across systems
Systemic Risk threat to the stability of an entire system


10. How The Conflict Is Likely To End

A clean victory is unlikely.

Iran is unlikely to reopen the Strait of Hormuz without concessions, particularly sanctions relief. Without this, it would emerge weaker and vulnerable to future attacks.

The most plausible outcome is a negotiated settlement mediated by external powers. Public narratives may claim victory, but the substance will reflect compromise.

The deeper consequence is structural. Rather than weakening the Iranian system, the war is likely to strengthen hardline control and reduce prospects for internal reform.

Sanctions Reliefeasing of economic restrictions imposed by other states
Negotiated Settlementagreement reached through diplomacy rather than force
Authoritarian Entrenchmentstrengthening of a centralised, repressive system


IF THIS GOES NUCLEAR

18 March 2026

Whether you're a Boy Scout or given to panic attacks, here in no particular priority order are some things worth thinking about :

1. Immediate Blast And Thermal Effects

  • Radius of destruction
  • Firestorms and burns
  • Urban vs rural exposure

2. Radiation Exposure

  • Initial ionising radiation
  • Fallout patterns and wind direction
  • Short vs long-term health effects

3. Fallout And Shelter Strategy

  • Need for shielding (concrete, underground)
  • Duration of sheltering (hours vs weeks)
  • Access to food, water, sanitation

4. Geographic Risk Assessment

  • Distance from likely targets
  • Proximity to military bases, ports, cities
  • Prevailing winds and weather systems

5. Supply Chain Disruption

  • Fuel shortages
  • Food availability
  • Medical supplies and pharmacies

6. Financial System Impact

  • Banking access and liquidity
  • Currency stability
  • Gold, cash, and alternative stores of value

7. Energy Shock

  • Oil and gas supply collapse
  • Electricity outages
  • Transport paralysis

8. Government Response And Controls

  • Martial law
  • Movement restrictions
  • Rationing systems

9. Communication Breakdown

  • Internet outages
  • Mobile network disruption
  • Access to reliable information

10. Evacuation vs Shelter-In-Place

  • Timing decisions
  • Transport availability
  • Border closures

11. Health System Collapse

  • Hospital overload
  • Lack of emergency services
  • Disease outbreaks

12. Social Stability And Security

  • Panic and crowd behaviour
  • Crime and looting
  • Community cooperation vs breakdown

13. Geopolitical Escalation

  • Risk of wider war (global powers)
  • NATO / US / Russia / China involvement
  • Secondary strikes

14. Long-Term Environmental Impact

  • Contaminated land and water
  • Agricultural collapse
  • Nuclear winter risk

15. Personal Preparedness

  • Emergency supplies
  • Documentation and identification
  • Family communication plan

16. Psychological And Moral Factors

  • Stress and decision-making under uncertainty
  • Maintaining discipline and routine
  • Ethical choices in crisis

17. Exit Routes And Safe Havens

  • Viable destinations
  • Visa and entry restrictions
  • Transport corridors

18. Information And Misinformation

  • Propaganda and panic narratives
  • Verifying sources
  • Decision-making under uncertainty

19. Timing And Early Warning Signals

  • Escalation indicators
  • Military movements
  • Diplomatic breakdowns

20. Recovery And Reconstruction Horizon

  • Duration of disruption
  • Economic rebuilding
  • Return to normality timelines

Sunday, 15 March 2026

MORAL DECADENCE PRECEDES CIVILISATIONAL COLLAPSE

15 March 2026

Trying to understand Trump - an aberration or normal End of Empire decadence and decline? 

End of Empire thesis 

Rise of empire → expansion and wealth → decadence and inequality → crisis → collapse → regime change

Economic expansion
→ Imperial overstretch
→ Economic crisis
→ Political crisis
→ Social fragmentation
→ Moral decadence
→ Regime change.

Go to offset 9.32. 

This clip shows people who are happy and relaxed, knowing that they are doing what they believe is right and, in the local spirit of martyrdom, ready to meet their maker if it saves their country.

Compare that with the people in this video, who are partying somewhere in a basement:


For anyone looking for historical parallels of moral decadence preceding civilisational collapse, is this not reminiscent of the twin cities of Sodom and Gomorrah?

Unconventional sexual behaviour and violence, mobs disrupting public life, abuse of immigrants, disregard for justice, and a general atmosphere of indulgence and cruelty.

This is another end-times type of story that could become our fate. In the biblical story the tale ends with divine destruction of hell fire and brimstone.

What about the moral decline of Rome? Banquets, strange sexual practices, cruel gladiatorial spectacles in the circus, loss of patriotism, civic duty and military discipline, and extreme inequality between the aristocracy and the people.

Is this what awaits us in the fall of the American empire? Are we almost there already?

It was similar under Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. Gambling, fashion and lavish banquets, with the aristocracy living completely detached from what was happening in the lives of ordinary people.

It was also the same kind of moral and administrative corruption that set in among the Ottomans well before the First World War: the sale of public offices, tax farming, etc etc.

The end-of-empire idea is that decadence, as one might call it, is a symptom of decline, not a cause of it. It is the familiar hundred-year rise-and-fall story of societies (rebuilding, awakening, unraveling and Neil Howe's crisis of the fourth turning). Towards the end, continuous expansion becomes too costly to sustain. Economic crisis leads to political crisis. Inequality and immigration lead to fragmentation and fighting. Amid the chaos and disorder, moral and behavioural norms break down, simply because the system has already become unstable. The final step is regime change and the emergence of a new Order.

Saturday, 14 March 2026

WAR, JUSTICE AND MIGRATION - THREE WAYS OF SEEING A FOREVER WAR

14 March 2026

WAR, JUSTICE AND MIGRATION 

Three ways of seeing the same conflict. We're talking about the war against Iran but we could be talking about any of the wars that America has been involved in in the last 70 years. Let's take these perspectives one by one. 

1. WAR refers to a historical and geopolitical perspective.
This view asks how wars begin, why they repeat, and what large forces such as empire, energy, resources, grand even global strategy, power and geography are driving them. It looks at long repeat-with-variations historical patterns and asks how wars might eventually end.

2. JUSTICE refers to the legal and moral viewpoint.
This perspective focuses on rules and responsibility. It asks who committed crimes, who violated the laws - of war and international and human rights, and who should be held accountable. It relies on institutions such as the United Nations and treaties like the Geneva Conventions.

3. MIGRATION refers to the domestic political standpoint.
This perspective looks at the consequences of wars rather than the particular war itself. Conflicts destroy societies and push people to move elsewhere. Immigration into Europe as an example and the UK more specifically, then becomes a major political issue of the home front. Writers such as Douglas Murray or Eric Zemmour discuss this angle under the heading of the Great Replacement. Some historians looking for repeat patterns note that large migration waves often appear in the later phases of empires.

WAR – why the conflict exists
JUSTICE – who is responsible for crimes
MIGRATION – how the conflict affects societies far away. 

THREE WAYS PEOPLE LOOK AT THE SAME WAR

When people talk about the wars in West Asia, they often think they are arguing about the same thing. In reality they are usually looking at the same events from three very different angles. Once you notice these angles it becomes much easier to understand why people disagree.

1. The first angle is the history, macro-economics and geopolitics view. People seeing a conflict this way are stepping back and looking at "the big picture". They ask about the shared life cycle of Empires, how this conflict started, how this empire is shaping the world or particular regions, and why similar struggles keep repeating. Historians such as Arnold J. Toynbee often looked at history in this broader way. The aim is not only to come to conclusions about events, but to understand the deeper forces behind them, and perhaps to find workable political arrangements around security issues that could create a lasting peace.

2. The second angle is the legal and moral view. People using this lens ask straightforward questions: who committed crimes, who broke the rules of war / international law / human rights, and who should be punished. They look at reports from organisations such as the United Nations and the Geneva Conventions. Their main concern is justice in the legal sense - crime & punishment of individuals. Civilians should not be killed, prisoners should not be abused, and those who break these rules should be held responsible. 

3. The third angle is the immigration and domestic politics view. Many people in Europe and North America worry less about the details of the war and more about its consequences at home. Wars in far away places destroy economies and societies, and when that happens many people leave their countries to search for safety and work elsewhere, often in the Metropole. Large migrations then shape politics inside countries such as Britain and France. 

Writers like Douglas Murray and broadcasters like Eric Zemmour have argued that mass immigration raises serious questions about national identity, borders and social stability in native Western societies, even that certain immigrant groups desire to take over and change the system itself. From a different angle, some historians observe that large migration flows often appear during the later stages of empires, when economic pressures such as the need for additional and low-cost labour, begin to destabilise the entire system.

4. These three perspectives look at the same events but ask different questions. One asks why the conflict exists and how it might end. Another asks who committed crimes. The third asks how distant wars affect everyday life inside Western countries. Recognising these different viewpoints helps explain why people sometimes talk past each other even though they are discussing the same events.

Glossary
Geopolitics – the study of how geography, resources and power influence international politics.


REFERENCES

1. WAR – THE HISTORICAL, MACRO AND GEOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVE

This approach asks why wars start, why they repeat, and what large forces such as empire, geography, energy, resources and human power are driving them.

Best book

The Revenge of Geography

• Clear explanation of how geography shapes power and conflict.
• Explains why certain regions repeatedly become battlefields.
• Accessible but serious.
• Very useful for understanding West Asia and great power rivalry.

Reference
Kaplan, Robert D. (2012) The Revenge of Geography.

Best YouTube video

John Mearsheimer
“The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

• Famous lecture explaining how great power politics works.
• Shows how geopolitical analysis differs from moral or legal arguments.
• Very clear explanation of how states behave in an anarchic international system.

Another best video 

The clearest video explaining the macroeconomic side of empire, debt and war comes from Ray Dalio.

How The Economic Machine Works & The Changing World Order

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xguam0TKMw8

This presentation summarises the argument later developed in Dalio’s book Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order.

The video is widely viewed on Youtube because it explains complex historical patterns in straightforward and visual terms.

Dalio’s framework links economics, empire and war through a repeating historical cycle.

He argues that great powers tend to follow a pattern:

First, a nation becomes rich and productive.

Second, its currency becomes dominant in global trade.

Third, financial markets expand and debt grows.

Fourth, internal inequality and political conflict increase.

Fifth, geopolitical rivalry intensifies and wars become more likely.

Financial overstretchAt that stage the empire often becomes financially overstretched. Military commitments increase while borrowing, and fiscal and trade debt levels, rise, weakening the system from within.

────────────────────────

WHY DEBT AND WAR ARE CONNECTED

Dalio’s key insight is that wars are often financed by debt and money creation.

When a country fights large wars it must pay for:

• military production

• soldiers and logistics

• reconstruction

• economic disruption

If tax revenues cannot cover these costs governments borrow or print money. Over time, the cost benefit analysis works against them and inflation can weaken the currency and the financial system supporting the empire.

────────────────────────

HOW THIS FITS THE “WAR – JUSTICE – MIGRATION” FRAMEWORK

Dalio’s work sits mainly inside the WAR viewpoint, the economic, historical and geopolitical perspective.

His analysis focuses on:

• macroeconomic power

• debt cycles

• great power competition

• imperial rise and decline

In that sense he is asking the question:

Why do empires fight wars and eventually lose their dominance?

Glossary
Geopolitics – the study of how geography, power and resources shape international relations.

────────────────────────

2. JUSTICE – THE LEGAL AND MORAL PERSPECTIVE

This regard focuses on international law, human rights and moral responsibility in war.

Best book

Just and Unjust Wars

• One of the most influential modern books on the ethics of war.
• Explains when war may be justified and what conduct in war is allowed.
• Widely used in universities, military academies and diplomatic circles.

Reference
Walzer, Michael (1977) Just and Unjust Wars.

Best YouTube video

Philippe Sands
“International Law and War Crimes”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9J6C0hKp9k

• Clear explanation of war crimes, accountability and international courts.
• Helps explain how institutions such as the International Criminal Court work.

Glossary
Just War Theory – a tradition of ethical reasoning about when war is justified and how it should be conducted.

────────────────────────

3. MIGRATION – THE DOMESTIC POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE

This angle focuses on how wars abroad produce population movements and how migration then affects metropolitan politics ie inside Western countries themselves.

Best book

The Strange Death of Europe

• One of the most widely discussed books on immigration and cultural change in Europe.
• Argues that large migration flows raise questions about identity, borders and political stability - all responsibilities the government loses control of as relations internationalise.
• Frequently referenced in debates about migration in Britain and Europe.

Reference
Murray, Douglas (2017) The Strange Death of Europe.

You might also see similar themes in the work of Éric Zemmour.

Best YouTube video

Douglas Murray
“The Future of Europe and Immigration”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l9pKk1Fh8Q

• Clear explanation of how migration debates are framed in Europe.
• Explores cultural, demographic and political arguments around immigration.

Glossary
Migration – the movement of people from one country or region to another, often driven by war, economic hardship or political instability.

────────────────────────

WHY COMBINING THESE THREE VIEWPOINTS COULD BE INTERESTING

Taken together, these three perspectives show how debates between deaf people you don't understand each other are futile and ennervating, with "contestants" talking past each other, giving the debates a strong emotional colouring, at the expense of reason and relevance.

WAR explains why conflicts start.
JUSTICE asks who is responsible for crimes.
MIGRATION looks at how the consequences hit the lives of ordinary people in Western societies.

Each perspective answers a different question, which is why people can argue intensely but futily, while actually discussing three different aspects of the same reality.

Friday, 13 March 2026

OZYMANDIAS AND THE WAR IN WEST ASIA

13 March 2026

https://youtu.be/8hCKv3HbTjA?is=xqQJBFOOq6jg5dXj

1. CONTEXT – A FRAMEWORK FOR THE IRAN WAR

What is new is the system-level shock now hitting the International Order. The American political scientist Robert A. Pape offers a useful framework for understanding what's going on. His approach helps filter out the daily noise – the endless headlines and social-media fragments bouncing around our screens and in our heads.

The framework is academic, if you prefer, but it maps reality rather well. It is essentially systems analysis - a sort of structured thinking. The benefit is that it dampens the emotions and and put the rational part of the brain in charge of the amygdala. In short, it frees us from emotional overload and helps us see not just events, but what is charging up those events and see the direction in which events may be heading.

Glossary
Systems analysis – a method of studying complex situations by identifying the actors, incentives and feedback loops shaping outcomes.

Thank you chatGPT 

────────────────────────

2. ESCALATION - TRAPPED ON THE LADDER

From that perspective, the two occupants in Washington and Tel Aviv seem caught in the flypaper of escalation. Once states begin climbing the escalation ladder, each move tends to demand a next-rung, and it becomes difficult to step back. In an asymmetric confrontation, it is often a ladder with horizontal steps as well as vertical. 

These two occupants seem mesmerised by the apparent power of precision bombing and their own strategic narratives, to the point where they ignore their analysts and public. But trouble is, escalation often develops a logic of its own. The next step is always calling. Leaders begin believing that the next strike, the next pressure point, will finally deliver the decisive outcome. History suggests otherwise. Escalation tends to widen conflicts rather than resolve them and this one looks like it's leading us to Armageddon.

Glossary
Escalation ladder – a strategic concept describing successive stages of military pressure, from limited strikes to full-scale war.

Reference
Herman Kahn, On Escalation (1965)

────────────────────────

3. WHAT IS THE WAR REALLY ABOUT?

Pape frames the crisis around Iran’s potential nuclear weapon. But is this really what it's all about? The nuclear issue may be less the core objective and more a strategic constraint or a pretext for war (there have been so many reasons given for this war!). 

The real American objectives stem more likely from a desire for power, for economic and geopolitical control, particularly control of global energy flows and the regional Order in West Asia. Washington is attempting extraction of Iran's wealth and domination of global energy markets, probably to constrain China’s access; while Israel seeks to remove its most powerful regional rival and pursue its apocalyptic Zionist vision, supposedly of Biblical origin. That raises the question: does the nuclear narrative simply provide the political justification for a much broader strategic struggle?

Glossary
Geopolitical objective – a strategic aim pursued by states to secure power, resources, or influence within the international system.

Reference
Daniel Yergin – The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations (2020)

────────────────────────

4. IRAN AND THE ESCALATION LADDER

Another angle often overlooked in the MSM is Iran’s own strategy. Tehran may not be trying to avoid escalation at all. Instead Tehran may be attempting to control the escalation ladder.


In this case, its objectives would doubtless mean raising the cost of US and Israeli intervention, weakening the American military presence in West Asia, and undermining confidence in US-aligned Gulf monarchies. Isn't Iran, in fact, trying to sweep America out of West Asia; to permanently, once and for all, neutralise the threat from Israel; to be free of sanctions and manipulation of its currency; to have unfettered control over its nuclear development program within the NPL; to see Gulf oil revenues stored not in American treasuries that just support America's debt driven economy and Israel and their forever was, but rather to invest in BRICS inf and finally reparations for the destruction of its infrastructure which may be paid by America but could be paid by the GCC about one or two trillion dollars? 

Iran wants out of the box that America has put it in and the strategic freedom to be able to pursue its own interests. This is iran's final stand - that is how its leadership sees this war. 

The Gulf kingdoms are coming to look particularly fragile. They are small monarchies ranged out along the narrow Gulf littoral, guarding the oil and gas extraction and export project, while behind them stretches far away, lone and level, barren and bare, the endless sands of time, completely indifferent to such political constructions.

Glossary
Littoral – the coastal zone where land meets the sea.

Reference
Kenneth Pollack – The Persian Puzzle (2004)

Why Iran isn't breaking 

────────────────────────

5. OZYMANDIAS

The situation evokes the theme captured in Percy Shelley’s poem Ozymandias. Empires appear invincible at the height of their power, yet history is full of mighty structures that proved far more fragile than they seemed.

In that sense the real question may not simply be whether the war escalates further. We should be thinking about which political structures in the region prove durable and which are just temporary figments of the occidental imagination.

Reference
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46565/ozymandias


Thursday, 12 March 2026

NETANYAHU IS A SPIDER IN TRUMP'S BRAIN

12 March 2026

1. NATO’s “High Five”

Israel’s Netanyahu is a spider in the brain of America’s Donald Trump. The usual game plan is the emperor builds his empire from wealth extracted using his vassals armies.

But in this case we have to update the game plan in a couple of ways. America is using its financial might coming from the exorbitant privilege of having the dollar as the world's reserve currency, as much as its military, to subdue and extract the energy, food, commodities and talent of its vassals.

Another unique feature - the state seems to have become rather dependent on the bond markets - the "Epstein class ++" - to finance its fiscal and trade twin shortfalls. 

Also on the technological prowess of the Israel lobby, allowing Israel’s own mini-haha emperor, Netanyahu, to coattail and pursue apocalyptic plans for his own mini empire in West Asia.


2. The Usual Imperial Pattern

But apart from this Israeli wrinkle, the rise and fall follows the usual historic path.

The immense wealth and needs of the capital start pulling in more and more immigrants so that they begin to change and even replace the culture of the original people.

As the rising costs of maintaining the empire, including paying the troops, begin to outstrip the returns, leaving only a cruel and pointless power, the hegemon has many tricks. For example: reduce the value of his currency so making it cheaper to repay his debt. Inflation is the same thing. Raising taxes or tariffs, imposing sanctions or confiscations.

Debasement is a good trick: reduce the precious metal content of the coin by replacing some of the silver with copper while keeping the same face value. Today banks create credit digitally to expand the money supply in the same way.

What we are seeing today is that war is emptying the state’s treasury, having increasing difficulty refinancing its Ponzi scheme, killing trade - which is its lifeblood, the Emperors credibility is evaporating.


3. The Strategic Question

As Mearsheimer constantly reminds us, America is an absolutely ruthless and determined enemy. Well, that is true of all emperors.

It is not clear for how much longer Putin can continue to remain so passive in the face of such provocation without risking being replaced. It seems that his own military and his own people are asking why he is not more aggressive in defending the homeland.

Would you slam an Oreshnik into Whitehall or The City or GCHQ in Cheltenham; or at least go for NATO’s military bases, supply depots, infrastructure, its barracks, ships and aircraft?

Of course that would be a short jog to nuclear Armageddon.

But otherwise, what does Putin have to fear from NATO’s “high five”?



Glossary

NATO Article 5 - the collective defence clause stating that an attack on one NATO member is treated as an attack on all members.

Debasement – reducing the precious metal content of a coin while keeping the same face value, historically used by rulers to finance spending.

Oreshnik - a reported Russian intermediate-range ballistic missile system capable of striking targets across Europe.

Empire - a political system in which a central power exercises control or dominance over other territories or states.

Hegemon - a dominant state or power that exercises leadership, authority, or control over other states within a regional or global system. In modern geopolitical usage it often functions as a softer or analytical synonym for what was called the emperor: a power that creates the institutions, sets the rules of the system, enforces them through military, financial, or political means, and expects other states (often called vassals or "allies" ) to follow its lead.

Bond Markets - the network of financial markets through which governments and large institutions borrow money by issuing bonds, which are tradable debt securities. When the United States runs a budget deficit, the U.S. Treasury sells Treasury bills, notes and bonds to investors. By purchasing these securities, investors effectively lend money to the U.S. government, which uses the proceeds to finance public spending and refinance existing debt. In return, the government promises to repay the principal at maturity and to pay regular interest.

The main buyers are large financial institutions: commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, central banks and asset-management firms operating in global financial centres such as New York, London and Tokyo. Because the U.S. dollar is the world’s principal reserve currency, American Treasury bonds have become the backbone collateral of the global financial system.

Historically the roots of modern bond markets lie in the early development of European financial capitalism in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Institutions in Amsterdam and London helped finance the great chartered trading companies such as the Dutch East India Company and the British East India Company. Over time this system evolved into today’s network of international banks and financial houses concentrated in major financial centres like the City of London and Wall Street, which continue to play a central role in organising global capital and government borrowing.

BIS ank for International Settlements – Global Bond Market Statistics

https://www.bis.org

Niall Ferguson – The Ascent of Money

HOW WAR HINDERS AMERICA IN THE AI RACE WITH CHINA

12 March 2026

1. The Pentagon, Strategy And Unexpected Consequences

The Pentagon has floor after floor of offices full of strategists and planners. One assumes they analyse first, second and third order effects of any conflict, prepare Plan Bs, timings and so on. They surely knew that this war was not going to work out the way Trump and Netanyahu thought it would work out they thought so and they said, three-star general Kaine said so, payborn Trump the military may not be able to complete the mission. 

And indeed, the world’s strongest military by far finds itself twelve days into a conflict and the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Iran is pushing out drone boats laiden with explosives, so no tanker will risk that a nor will any insurer. 

Most commentary focuses on the obvious consequences: higher oil prices and disruption to global shipping. But there is an overlooked question. What thought has gone into the effect on America’s technological competition with China?

After all, American global leadership depends in part on winning the technology race, and today that race centres on Artificial Intelligence.

---

2. AI Runs On Electricity

Artificial Intelligence is often presented as a triumph of software and algorithms. In reality it is also a massive industrial system that runs on electricity.

Training large AI models requires enormous data centres packed with specialised processors. These installations consume extraordinary amounts of power.

Here the comparison with China is uncomfortable. Over the past two decades the United States has added relatively little to its electricity generation and transmission capacity. China, by contrast, has expanded its grid at breathtaking speed, reportedly adding the equivalent of the entire American electricity grid in roughly four years.

If the future of AI depends on access to abundant electricity, then the underlying energy infrastructure matters as much as the technology itself.


---

3. The Hyperscalers And The Infrastructure Race

At the centre of this system sit the hyperscalers.

These are the giant technology companies that operate vast global cloud computing networks. Their infrastructure forms the backbone of the modern internet, supporting Artificial Intelligence, cloud services, streaming platforms and corporate computing systems.

Companies such as Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Oracle are building ever larger data centres across the world.

These projects require two things above all: power and capital.

Much of the investment comes from the companies’ own balance sheets. But a substantial portion is financed through borrowing. That means the economics of AI infrastructure depend heavily on stable financial conditions and relatively low interest rates.

Wars complicate this equation. Military spending increases government borrowing, which pushes bond yields higher. Higher yields raise the cost of financing the massive infrastructure that AI development requires.

Amazon – through Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Microsoft – through Azure
Google – through Google Cloud
Meta – operating huge internal data-centre networks
Alibaba – dominant hyperscaler in China
Tencent – another large Chinese cloud provider

---

4. Energy Prices And The Geography Of Data Centres

Energy prices also matter.

Many hyperscale companies have been exploring locations in the Gulf region precisely because of abundant and relatively cheap energy. Large data centres require reliable electricity at competitive prices in order to remain viable.

A prolonged disruption in the Strait of Hormuz pushes oil prices upward, increases energy costs globally and introduces uncertainty into energy markets.

This is hardly the environment that technology companies prefer when planning multi-billion-dollar infrastructure projects.


---

5. The Strategy

The ingredients required for success in the AI race are surprisingly mundane.

A modern and expanding electricity grid.
Low and stable interest rates.
Reliable energy supplies.
Oil prices somewhere in the $60 range and certainly well below $100.

In short, the geopolitical conditions that allow hyperscalers to build the digital infrastructure of the future.

American hegemony ultimately depends on technological leadership, so these under appreciated economic conditions matter as much as aircraft carriers or missile systems.


---

6. Glossary

Artificial Intelligence (AI) – computer systems capable of learning from data and performing tasks that normally require human reasoning or pattern recognition.

Hyperscaler – very large technology companies that operate massive global cloud computing infrastructure supporting AI, internet services and corporate computing.

Data Centre – a facility housing thousands of servers and specialised processors used to store and process digital information. Cf data centre v. AI data centre. 

Electricity Grid – the network of power generation, transmission and distribution systems that deliver electricity to industry and households.

Strait of Hormuz – the narrow maritime passage between Iran and Oman through which roughly one fifth of global oil trade normally passes.


---

References


International Energy Agency – Electricity 2024
https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024

U.S. Energy Information Administration – Electric Power Data
https://www.eia.gov/electricity

Bloomberg – AI Data Centre Power Demand
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-09/ai-power-demand-data-centers

McKinsey – The Rise of Hyperscale Data Centres
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/the-coming-hyperscale-data-center-boom