Tuesday, 4 August 2026

THE LIQUIDITY CYCLE IS PEAKING AND WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO



The Liquidity Cycle Peaks Again: What Michael Howell's Framework Says About 2026


If money moves markets before fundamentals ever do, what does it mean that the world's most experienced tracker of that money now says liquidity has peaked?


FAST TRACK (30-second summary)

Michael Howell, who built his global liquidity framework watching money physically move across the Salomon Brothers trading floor in the 1980s, argues capital arrives first before fundamentals justify it. His sixty-five month liquidity cycle, identified in 2000 and stable ever since, is currently peaking in 2026, following the last peak in 2021. 

Warning signs include a bearish flattening yield curve, narrow market breadth beneath a handful of surging technology names, a gold-oil ratio implying oil should be trading well above two hundred dollars a barrel, heavy US debt refinancing, and stress in market plumbing

The big structural problem: roughly six hundred billion dollars a week of US debt needing refinancing, forcing authorities to suppress bond market volatility rather than control yields directly. 

Howell's advice is not to time the peak precisely but to manage risk: keep a disciplined core portfolio and ring-fence any speculative positioning.


Introduction

There is a persistent habit among investors of treating markets as a referendum on fundamentals: earnings, interest rates, growth forecasts. Michael Howell, who has tracked what he calls global liquidity for four decades, argues this gets the causality backwards. Money moves first. Fundamentals catch up later, if at all, to justify what has already happened. His framework, developed on the trading floor at Salomon Brothers and refined ever since, treats the flow of money and credit through world financial markets as the primary driver of asset prices, with fundamentals relegated to the story told afterwards.

What follows sets out Howell's current thinking on where the liquidity cycle stands, how it is measured, and what it implies for asset allocation through the remainder of 2026.


Why It Matters

If Howell is correct that liquidity leads fundamentals rather than the reverse, then conventional analysis, focused on earnings multiples, GDP growth and central bank rate announcements, is perpetually looking in the rear-view mirror. For a reader trying to position a portfolio ahead of a shift rather than in reaction to one, understanding where the liquidity cycle sits matters more than parsing the latest earnings season. The stakes are not abstract: Howell's own cyclical marker points to a peak in 2026, and the framework's last peak, in 2021, was followed by a significant repricing across risk assets.


Contents Cover the Following

1. What global liquidity actually measures
2. Why liquidity leads fundamentals rather than the reverse
3. The sixty-five month cycle and its four phases
4. Late cycle warning signals: the yield curve and market breadth
5. Debt monetisation and the mechanics of yield suppression
6. The gold to oil ratio as a triangulation tool
7. IPOs, buybacks and the direction of flows
8. Portfolio construction across the cycle
9. Beneath the Headline Rate: SOFR, Reserves and the Fed's Plumbing - this is covered in the article Fed Plumbing Explained


1. What Global Liquidity Actually Measures

Howell defines liquidity broadly as money and credit, not simply the money supply figures that dominate financial commentary. The practical measurement looks at the credit side of financial institutions' balance sheets worldwide: central banks such as the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan and the People's Bank of China, alongside private sector banks, shadow banks and the repo markets. The distinction that matters is between money circulating in the real economy, which funds car manufacturing or widget production, and money circulating within financial markets, which is what his framework is built to track. It is this second category, wholesale money used for financial transactions rather than real economic activity, that determines asset prices.

Glossary

Global liquidity. The aggregate flow of money and credit through world financial markets, encompassing central bank balance sheets, private bank lending, shadow banking and repo market activity, as distinct from money circulating in the real economy. Howell treats it as a measurable quantity, built up bank by bank and market by market, rather than a loose metaphor for "easy money".

Shadow banking. Lending and credit creation carried out by institutions other than traditional deposit-taking banks, such as money market funds, hedge funds and private credit vehicles. It sits outside much conventional bank regulation, yet supplies a large and growing share of the credit that Howell's framework tracks.

Repo market. Short for repurchase agreement market, where institutions borrow cash overnight or short-term by temporarily selling securities, usually government bonds, with an agreement to buy them back at a slightly higher price. It is one of the plumbing systems of global finance and a key place where liquidity stress shows up first.

Financialisation. The long-run growth of financial markets relative to the size of the underlying economy. Howell notes that US financial markets are now roughly two times GDP, compared with fifty to sixty percent several decades ago, which is why liquidity flows now carry outsized influence over asset prices relative to historical norms.


2. Why Liquidity Leads Fundamentals Rather Than the Reverse

Howell's central claim is that capital arrives before the justification for it does. Expanding price-to-earnings multiples, for instance, reflect anticipation of future fundamentals that may or may not materialise, but the transaction itself is driven by available money. When central banks force liquidity into markets, as occurred after the 2008 financial crisis and again after the pandemic, asset prices rise regardless of what fundamentals are doing at the time.

"We're schooled in the idea that markets react to fundamentals, but actually capital gets there first."

The growing size of financial markets relative to GDP amplifies this effect: wealth effects generated by rising asset prices now feed back into the real economy in a way that was far less significant thirty or forty years ago.

Follow the money - be the first to get where the banbks are pushing the liquidity

Glossary

Wealth effect. The tendency of rising asset prices to increase consumption and economic activity, independent of underlying income growth, by making asset holders feel and behave as though they are wealthier. A rising stock market can therefore lift real-economy spending even before wages move.

Lagging indicator. A metric, such as corporate earnings or GDP growth, that responds to and confirms a market move only after the move has already occurred, rather than predicting it in advance. Howell's argument is that most of what investors watch closely falls into this category.

Price-to-earnings multiple, PER. A valuation measure comparing a company's share price to its earnings per share. A rising multiple means investors are paying more for each unit of current profit, typically because they expect profits to grow, or because there is simply more money chasing the same shares.

Cantillon effect. A theory describing how the benefits of money creation are distributed unevenly. Those who receive newly created money first can buy assets and goods before prices rise, while those who receive it later often face higher prices without a corresponding increase in income.

The practical lesson is that capital begins with Federal Reserve policy, is leveraged through the financial system, and then spreads into the real economy. Successful investors seek to follow that flow, identifying where money is moving next as the Cantillon Effect, economic conditions, and geopolitical forces channel it into commodities, monetary metals, quality property, and companies with durable pricing power.


3. The Sixty-Five Month Cycle and Its Four Phases

Howell identified a recurring cyclical pattern in global liquidity data using Fourier analysis around the year 2000. That work established the sixty-five month periodicity and, once set, the method has proved stable ever since, with the actual cycle extrapolated forward and tracked against outcomes for the following quarter century. The cycle divides into four phases: rebound, calm, speculation and turbulence. Equities perform best during the rebound and upswing phases. Commodities do best around the peak, because the liquidity cycle leads the real economy, and as liquidity peaks the economy is moving from trough towards acceleration, increasing demand for raw materials. As liquidity subsequently tightens, defensive assets and cash come into favour, and as the squeeze deepens towards the cycle's trough, longer duration bonds perform best in anticipation of central bank rate cuts.

Howell's current assessment places the cycle at a peak in 2026, following the last peak in 2021.

Glossary

Sixty-five month liquidity cycle. A recurring cyclical pattern in global liquidity that Howell identified using data analysis around the year 2000, with an approximate periodicity of sixty-five months. It has been tracked and extrapolated forward ever since, and has lined up reasonably well with subsequent turning points in markets.

Fourier analysis. A mathematical technique, originally developed for physics and signal processing, that breaks a complicated, noisy series of data down into a set of simpler repeating wave patterns. Howell applied it to decades of financial data to test whether liquidity moved in genuine, measurable cycles rather than at random, and it was this analysis that surfaced the sixty-five month pattern.

Speculation phase. The late stage of the liquidity cycle, occurring around its peak, characterised by continued positive returns coexisting with elevated volatility, such that the risk-adjusted quality of those returns is significantly reduced. Howell places the market in this phase as of 2026.

Turbulence phase. The most difficult stage of the cycle, arriving as liquidity contracts sharply and financial conditions tighten. It typically brings the worst risk-adjusted returns for equities and commodities, and is when Howell's framework argues investors should already be positioned defensively rather than reacting to the stress as it appears.


4. Late Cycle Warning Signals: the Yield Curve and Market Breadth

Howell points to several markers of a late cycle environment. The most robust, despite lagging the liquidity cycle by roughly nine months, is the slope of the yield curve; a bearish flattening, where long end yields rise more slowly than short end yields, is a reliable late cycle confirming signal. A second marker is market breadth: strong headline index performance driven by a narrow group of technology and semiconductor stocks, while the broader market outside those names remains lacklustre and many individual stocks make new lows, is characteristic of a late stage rally rather than a broad-based bull market.

"You've got to be approximately right rather than precisely wrong."

Glossary

Yield curve. A line plotting the interest rates, or yields, on government bonds of different maturities, from short-term to long-term. Its shape is one of the most closely watched signals in finance, because it reflects investor expectations for growth, inflation and future central bank policy.

Bearish flattening. A movement in the yield curve in which long-term yields rise more slowly than short-term yields, causing the curve to flatten and potentially invert. It is generally regarded as a late cycle warning signal, since it suggests investors expect growth or inflation to cool even as near-term borrowing costs stay elevated.

Market breadth. A measure of how broadly a market's gains are distributed across constituent stocks, as opposed to being concentrated in a small number of large or high-momentum names. Narrow breadth beneath a rising headline index is a classic sign that a rally is running out of underlying support.

Term structure. Another name for the pattern of interest rates across different maturities, essentially the technical term behind the more familiar phrase "yield curve". Movements in the term structure are what Howell is describing when he refers to flattening or steepening.


5. Debt Monetisation and the Mechanics of Yield Suppression

A structural feature of the current environment, in Howell's account, is the scale of government debt requiring refinancing. US Treasury debt carries an average maturity of five to six years, meaning a continual rolling burden estimated at roughly six hundred billion dollars a week. Financial markets, in his view, now function primarily as refinancing mechanisms for existing debt rather than as new capital raising mechanisms for productive investment. When banks purchase government debt, they are, in effect, monetising it, a process Howell frames as printing money by another name.

The authorities manage this burden partly through issuance strategy, concentrating new supply at the short end of the curve to starve the long end and keep long yields capped, and partly through direct intervention, using Treasury buybacks to suppress bond market volatility whenever the MOVE index, the bond market equivalent of the VIX, spikes higher.


Glossary

Debt monetisation. The process by which government debt is purchased by banks or central banks acting as intermediaries, effectively expanding the money supply to fund government borrowing rather than debt being absorbed by genuine new savings. Howell regards the current pace of Treasury issuance and bank purchases as a modern form of this practice.

MOVE index. An index measuring implied volatility in the US Treasury bond market, functioning as the bond market's equivalent of the VIX equity volatility index. Howell treats spikes in the MOVE index as a more important signal to watch than the Federal Reserve's own policy rate.

Yield volatility control. A policy of suppressing fluctuations in bond yields through active intervention, such as Treasury buybacks, distinct from yield curve control, which targets the level of yields directly rather than their volatility. Howell argues this, rather than outright yield curve control, is what is actually happening in US Treasury markets today.

Debt refinancing. The process of replacing maturing debt with newly issued debt, rather than paying it off outright. With an average Treasury maturity of five to six years, a large share of outstanding US government debt must be refinanced on a rolling basis every year, regardless of whether new spending is taking place.


6. The Gold to Oil Ratio as a Triangulation Tool

Howell treats the long-run ratio between an ounce of gold and a barrel of oil, averaging around twenty to one over the past fifty to sixty years, as a further confirming signal that moves in step with the liquidity cycle. At the front end of a liquidity upswing, the ratio rises because the gold price climbs while oil lags. Towards the back end of the cycle, the ratio falls back not because gold declines but because oil catches up, as money exits financial markets and flows into the real economy.

With gold trading in the four to five thousand dollar range, the historical ratio implies an oil price above two hundred dollars a barrel, a figure Howell acknowledges sounds implausible to most investors but which he presents as a structural implication of sustained debt monetisation rather than a near term forecast.

Glossary

Gold to oil ratio. The number of barrels of oil that one ounce of gold can purchase, historically averaging around twenty to one over the long term - the last 50 or 60 years. Howell uses it as a cross-check on whether gold or oil is mispriced relative to the other, and as a secondary indicator of the liquidity cycle's stage.

Debasement trade. An investment approach built on the expectation that ongoing debt monetisation and currency creation will erode the purchasing power of fiat money over time, typically expressed through holdings of gold, gold miners, and broader commodities as stores of value rather than income-generating assets. Howell's gold-oil analysis sits within this broader thesis.

Triangulation. In this context, the practice of cross-checking a view on one asset, such as gold, against two other related variables, here the oil price and the gold-oil ratio itself, so that no single number is relied upon in isolation. It is a discipline for testing whether a price looks genuinely stretched or simply unfamiliar.


7. IPOs, Buybacks and the Direction of Flows

A wave of major initial public offerings, including SpaceX at a scale representing a significant share of total US market capitalisation, alongside anticipated listings from firms such as Anthropic and OpenAI, would ordinarily be read as liquidity being withdrawn from financial markets to fund real economy activity, a negative signal within Howell's framework. He notes a mitigating technicality: the free float offered in such listings is typically small relative to the headline valuation, forcing index funds and other passive vehicles to chase limited available supply.

The more significant structural shift, in his view, is on the buyback side. Share buybacks in the US have been substantial but are beginning to slow as corporate cash is redirected towards capital expenditure, at the same time as buyback activity in Europe and Japan is increasing, a divergence he suggests favours geographic diversification away from US equities.

Glossary

Initial public offering (IPO). The first sale of a private company's shares to public investors, converting it into a publicly listed company. Large IPOs draw fresh cash out of the pool of money circulating within financial markets and into the company being listed.

Free float. The proportion of a company's shares actually available for public trading, as distinct from shares held by founders, insiders or locked up post-listing. It determines how much index and passive fund buying pressure a new listing can absorb relative to its full valuation.

Share buyback. The repurchase by a corporation of its own outstanding shares using company cash, reducing share count and, all else equal, supporting the share price. Howell treats it as the structural counterpart to IPO issuance in the flow of funds into and out of equity markets.

Capital expenditure (capex). Spending by a company on physical assets such as factories, equipment or infrastructure, intended to support future growth. Howell's point is that cash once used for buybacks is increasingly being redirected towards capex, reducing one source of equity market support.


8. Portfolio Construction Across the Cycle

Howell is cautious about translating cyclical analysis into precise market timing, preferring, in his words, to be approximately right rather than precisely wrong. His practical recommendation is a two tier portfolio structure: a disciplined core, built to compound steadily through the cycle even at modest annual returns sufficient to outpace inflation over the long term, and a smaller speculative allocation, sized according to individual risk tolerance, that can ride cyclical momentum during phases such as the current speculation stage without exposing the whole portfolio to a sharp reversal.

He regards the tendency of retail investors to treat their entire portfolio as a momentum trade, rather than ring-fencing speculation within a disciplined core, as one of the more consistent and costly mistakes made across market cycles.

Glossary

Core-satellite portfolio structure. This is the central structural idea Howell wants investors to take away. The "core" is the majority of the portfolio, say 80%. built for discipline and durability rather than excitement: diversified, unglamorous, and expected to deliver modest but reliable real returns, say 5 to 10% annual, that outpace inflation over the long run regardless of which phase the liquidity cycle is in.

The "satellite" is a smaller, clearly bounded portion, sized to what an investor can genuinely afford to lose, that is deliberately allowed to chase momentum during phases like the current speculation stage. The two are never mixed. The discipline is not in avoiding speculation altogether, since Howell is relaxed about investors taking speculative positions if they wish, but in never letting speculative logic govern the core, so that a sharp turbulence phase damages only the satellite and leaves the core, and the investor's long-term position, intact.

Risk management (in this context). The discipline of controlling how much of a portfolio is exposed to a given source of risk, rather than trying to predict the exact timing of a market turn. Howell frames sizing a speculative allocation as a risk management decision, not a forecasting one. Use Sharpe and Sortino.

Momentum trading. An approach that buys assets because their price is already rising, on the expectation the trend will continue, rather than because of an underlying valuation view. Howell warns against letting this become the default behaviour for an entire portfolio, since momentum can reverse sharply once a cycle turns.



Bottom Line

Howell's framework does not predict a crash on a given date. What it does is describe a regime: a liquidity cycle at its peak, a bond market showing late cycle stress, a rally increasingly narrow beneath the surface, and a debt refinancing burden so large that central banks are managing bond volatility directly rather than allowing markets to set yields freely. None of that requires an immediate reversal. It does argue for treating the current rally as a speculation phase rather than the early stages of a durable bull market, and for structuring portfolios accordingly: a disciplined core, a bounded speculative sleeve, and closer attention to commodities and non-US equities than the headline index numbers might suggest is necessary.


Optional Deep Dive

The basis trade. Part of what keeps long-term US Treasury yields capped despite a booming, inflationary economy is a specific piece of financial engineering known as the basis trade. Hedge funds buy cash Treasury bonds and simultaneously sell Treasury futures short, pocketing the small pricing gap between the two. The trade is highly profitable when scaled up with borrowed money, but it only works while bond market volatility stays low, because a sharp move in yields can turn a small, safe-looking spread into a large loss almost overnight. This is why the Treasury's own buyback programme, which steps in to suppress the MOVE index whenever it spikes, is not just a debt management tool but also, in effect, life support for the basis trade itself. The two are entangled: suppressed volatility sustains the trade, and the trade's continued appetite for cash Treasuries helps absorb the enormous weekly issuance the US government needs to roll over its debt.

Japan's role in financing US debt. Japan has historically been one of the largest foreign holders of US Treasury debt, a position closely tied to the gap between Japanese and US interest rates. For years, Japanese interest rates were held near zero while US yields sat far higher, encouraging what is known as the carry trade: borrowing cheaply in yen and investing the proceeds in higher-yielding US Treasuries. That flow has been a quiet but significant source of demand supporting the US bond market. As the Bank of Japan has moved gradually away from its ultra-low rate policy, the incentive for Japanese investors and institutions to keep recycling savings into US Treasuries has weakened, and any further narrowing of the US-Japan rate gap raises the risk that this long-standing source of demand shrinks or reverses, adding to the pressure on US authorities to find other buyers for their debt.

CPI Inflation"The inflation process is often described using CPI, but CPI is merely the final stage visible to consumers. Inflation usually begins with rising commodity costs, appears next in business surveys such as ISM and PMI Prices Paid, then enters the Producer Price Index through intermediate-demand and final-demand goods. Only after firms pass these higher costs through the supply chain does inflation appear in consumer measures such as CPI and PCE. For this reason, CPI is generally regarded as a lagging indicator of inflationary pressure already building elsewhere in the economy."

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

ISM Prices Paid – A survey measure showing whether purchasing managers are paying more or less for inputs.

PMI (Purchasing Managers' Index) – A survey of business activity, orders, employment and input costs.

PPI Intermediate Demand – Inflation occurring between businesses as goods and services move through the production chain.

PPI Final Demand – Prices received by producers for goods and services sold to final users.

CPI – Consumer Price Index; measures prices paid by households.

PCE – Personal Consumption Expenditures; the Federal Reserve's preferred measure of consumer inflation.

Cost Transmission – The process by which higher input costs move through the supply chain and eventually reach consumers.


Related Articles on this Site

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/08/the-liquidity-cycle-is-peaking-and-what.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/06/slowing-liquidity.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/06/fed-and-treasjury-buying-short-abd-long.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/04/fx-swap-lines-used-to-support-us-fiscal.html


References

Michael Howell, interviewed August, 2026

Print or Collapse


Further Reading

 Howell - Capital Wars substack

FED PLUMBING UNDERSTOOD

What if the Fed's headline interest rate decision is pure pantomime?


Fast Track (30 seconds)

Michael Howell argues that the Fed's headline interest rate decision is theatre. The real liquidity signal sits in the plumbing: bank reserves, the repo market, and the spread between SOFR and what the Fed pays banks on reserves. When that spread widens, cash is genuinely scarce, whatever the headline rate says. A recent six month, six hundred billion dollar injection into money markets, triggered by exactly this kind of stress, is Howell's Exhibit A - and, by his account, the real explanation for Wall Street's buoyancy.

- Reserves - cash banks hold on deposit at the Fed, beyond what they lend out elsewhere.

- EFFR (Effective Federal Funds Rate) - the actual overnight rate banks charge each other to borrow reserves.

- SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) - the overnight rate for cash borrowed against Treasury collateral in the repo market.

- ON RRP (Overnight Reverse Repo Facility) - where money market funds park surplus cash with the Fed when reserves are abundant.

- SRF (Standing Repo Facility) - where banks borrow cash from the Fed against Treasury collateral when reserves are tight.

- IORB (Interest on Reserve Balances) - the rate the Fed pays banks on reserves; the anchor both EFFR and SOFR are meant to track.

- Fed funds target range - the Fed's official upper and lower bound, distinct from EFFR, which is the rate actually traded within it.

Introduction

Every six weeks or so, financial media treats the Federal Reserve's rate announcement as the most important economic event on the calendar. Michael Howell disagrees, and not mildly. In his view, the meeting itself is close to pantomime: a ritual performance that tells investors almost nothing about the actual state of liquidity in the financial system. The real story, he argues, is happening somewhere most people never look - in the technical plumbing of the banking system, where the Fed and Treasury quietly manage the pressure in a pipe network of reserves, repo markets and collateral.


Why It Matters

If Howell is right, investors who fixate on the Fed funds rate are watching the wrong gauge. The plumbing indicators below move first, move more honestly, and - in Howell's telling - already explain a recent multi hundred billion dollar liquidity injection that the headline rate never predicted. Understanding them is a precondition for understanding where the liquidity cycle, and by extension asset prices, go next.


Contents Cover the Following

1. Why Howell calls the rate decision "pantomime"
2. The plumbing gauge that matters most: the SOFR spread
3. Two safety valves: the ON RRP and the Standing Repo Facility
4. The six hundred billion dollar case study
5. Bottom line and what to watch next


1. Why Howell Calls the Rate Decision "Pantomime"

The actual volume of lending conducted at the Fed funds rate is small. That is Howell's starting point, and it is the reason he is dismissive of the attention paid to each FOMC meeting.

"Does it really matter that interest rates go up or down? Not really - the amount of transactions in the Fed funds market is diminutive."

He goes further: Kevin Warsh has signalled that under a different Fed leadership, there could be as few as three or four FOMC meetings a year, with no formal forward guidance at all. If the ritual itself may soon be scaled back, Howell's underlying point sharpens - the market's attention has been trained on the wrong signal for years.

What matters instead, in his framing, is what the Fed and Treasury are doing beneath the surface: managing bank reserves, watching wholesale money markets, and tracking how short term borrowing rates behave relative to the Fed's own targets.


2. The Plumbing Gauge That Matters Most: The SOFR Spread

Two overnight rates anchor the system. The Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR) is what banks actually charge each other to borrow reserves overnight. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) is the equivalent rate for cash borrowed against Treasury collateral in the repo market. Both are meant to trade close to the rate the Fed pays banks on their reserve balances (IORB), with low volatility.

When they don't - when SOFR spikes away from that anchor - something in the plumbing is under strain. That spread, not the headline target range, is Howell's preferred early warning gauge for stress in short term funding markets.

A widening SOFR spread is a sign of friction in the system long before it shows up anywhere the headline rate can capture.

3. Two Safety Valves: The ON RRP and the Standing Repo Facility

Two Fed facilities sit at opposite ends of the same pipe.

The overnight reverse repo facility (ON RRP) absorbs surplus cash from money market funds and other institutions. When reserves are genuinely plentiful, usage should be minimal. Rising usage signals excess cash sloshing around with nowhere better to go.

The Standing Repo Facility (SRF) does the reverse: it lends cash to banks against Treasury collateral when they are short. Occasional use is normal. Sustained, growing use signals real thirst for liquidity in the banking system - the condition Howell points to directly in the case study below.


4. The Six Hundred Billion Dollar Case Study

Howell points to a concrete recent episode. Over five to six months, the Federal Reserve injected roughly six hundred billion dollars into US money markets. He links that injection directly to the buoyancy of Wall Street over the same period - not as a side effect, but as a central driver.

The trigger, in his account, was that repo markets were growing short of liquidity, visible in exactly the indicator described above: SOFR spiking upward relative to the Fed's target range. The Fed responded not through a rate decision, but through the plumbing - reserve management purchases conducted purely to keep the banking system's cash levels adequate, with no accompanying announcement of the kind that dominates financial headlines.


Bottom Line

The Fed funds rate is a headline. The plumbing - reserves, the SOFR spread, and usage of the ON RRP and Standing Repo Facility - is where the real liquidity story is written. A recent six hundred billion dollar injection, triggered by repo market stress and largely invisible in mainstream coverage, is Howell's case that the plumbing already told investors what the rate decision could not.


Glossary

Reserves. In the Fed's plumbing, this refers to the cash balances that commercial banks hold on deposit at the central bank, above what they lend out elsewhere. Howell treats changes in reserves as more informative than the Fed funds rate itself, since reserve levels are one of the Fed's most direct levers for adding or draining liquidity.

Repurchase agreement (repo). A short term, secured loan structured as a sale and buyback of a security, usually overnight. One party sells a Treasury bond for cash and agrees to buy it back the next day at a slightly higher price; the other holds the bond as collateral. Stress in this market, visible as a spike in the repo rate, spreads quickly into the wider financial system.

Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). The benchmark rate for borrowing cash overnight against Treasury collateral. It has become the main reference for dollar borrowing costs and is one of Howell's preferred real time gauges of funding stress.

Standing Repo Facility (SRF). Lends cash to eligible banks and primary dealers against Treasury or agency collateral, at a rate set by the FOMC. It acts as a backstop when the repo market is short of cash, and rising use of it signals tightening liquidity in the banking system.


References

How money flows move asset prices

Michael Howell interview material
Federal Reserve Bank of New York - SOFR data and methodology
Federal Reserve Board - Standing Repo Facility and ON RRP operational notes

Related Articles on this Site

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/08/the-liquidity-cycle-is-peaking-and-what.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/06/slowing-liquidity.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/06/fed-and-treasjury-buying-short-abd-long.html

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/04/fx-swap-lines-used-to-support-us-fiscal.html

Wednesday, 29 July 2026

ENERGY, EMPIRE AND THE DOLLAR

29 July 2926

ENERGY, EMPIRE AND THE DOLLAR

What if the wars dominating today's headlines are not really about oil at all, but about protecting a financial system built upon it?



Why the Financial System May Be Unable to Accept Defeat

Contents cover the following:

• Why energy has remained the organising principle of great-power strategy for more than a century

• Why control over oil finance may matter more than control over oil itself

• How the Western banking system became structurally dependent upon the petrodollar

• Why banking leverage could make negotiated peace financially dangerous

• How distorted commodity markets may be signalling deeper systemic stress

• Why inflation may become the preferred solution to an overleveraged financial system

• The strengths and weaknesses of this interpretation.

────────────────────────────

1. INTRODUCTION

Most discussions of international conflict revolve around ideology, democracy, human rights or territorial disputes. Those explanations undoubtedly play a role.

This article examines a different framework.

It proposes that energy has been the constant objective of imperial strategy for over a century, while the US dollar has become the financial mechanism through which control of energy translates into global financial power.

If this interpretation is correct, today's conflicts are not simply about territory or governments. They concern the preservation of a financial architecture whose stability depends upon continued confidence in dollar-denominated energy finance.

Whether every part of this argument proves correct is open to debate. Nevertheless, it offers a coherent explanation for several otherwise puzzling developments.

────────────────────────────

2. ENERGY HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE STRATEGIC PRIZE

The transition of the British Empire from coal to oil during the early twentieth century fundamentally altered global geopolitics.

Oil possessed extraordinary advantages.

Modern hydrocarbons perform more than fifty times the work obtainable from equivalent human labour. Industrial output, transport, agriculture and military capability all became directly dependent upon abundant energy supplies.

Consequently, economic growth has closely tracked energy consumption throughout modern history.

From this perspective, securing reliable control over hydrocarbon-producing regions became an enduring objective of great-power strategy.

The Middle East became strategically indispensable.

Later, attention increasingly focused upon other major reserves, including Venezuela and Canada's Alberta oil sands.

Supporters of this theory argue that these interests are best understood through energy security rather than the official language of democracy promotion, nuclear proliferation or humanitarian intervention.

Particular emphasis is placed upon heavy crude oil.

Unlike the lighter grades produced through hydraulic fracturing in the United States, heavy crude remains particularly valuable for aviation fuels, shipping and heavy industrial applications.

Its strategic importance therefore extends well beyond simple production volumes.

Glossary

Imperial energy logic – the argument that control over hydrocarbon-producing regions has shaped great-power strategy for over a century.

Heavy crude (sour crude) – dense, high-sulphur oil particularly suited to aviation fuel, shipping and heavy industry.. Dense, high-sulphur oil ("sour" refers to its sulphur content; low-sulphur oil is "sweet"). Refineries are designed for specific crude grades, and many US Gulf Coast refineries are optimised for heavy crude. America's shale oil is mainly light, sweet crude and cannot fully replace it, making Venezuelan heavy oil strategically important.

────────────────────────────

3. THE DOLLAR MAY BE THE REAL PRIZE

This interpretation argues that oil itself is not the ultimate objective. After all, countries without empires successfully purchase oil on international markets every day.

The real prize, according to this analysis, is control over financing. When Western banks finance energy projects for multinational companies such as Chevron or Shell, those loans become valuable assets on bank balance sheets.

The resulting oil is then typically sold in US dollars.

Loan repayments therefore flow back into Western financial institutions.

Under this model, wealth generated in Nigeria, Kazakhstan or elsewhere ultimately services debts owed to banks in London, New York or Paris.

Supporters describe this not as traditional colonialism but as financial colonialism.

Rather than directly owning foreign resources, financial institutions capture part of the value created through the financing mechanism itself. Countries attempting to finance their own energy development outside this system may therefore be perceived as threatening its foundations.

Glossary

Petrodollar recycling – the return of dollar-denominated oil revenues into Western financial institutions through lending and investment.

Financial colonialism – influence exercised through financial structures rather than direct political rule.

────────────────────────────

4. WHEN THE BANKING SYSTEM CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE

A central constat is that decades of energy lending have created enormous banking exposure. Commercial banks typically operate with relatively thin capital cushions. High leverage means relatively modest losses can eliminate shareholder equity.

If conflicts interrupt energy production, export revenues decline. When borrowers cannot service loans, those loans become non-performing assets.

Supporters of this thesis argue that prolonged disruption across parts of the Middle East therefore threatens far more than oil supplies. It threatens the balance sheets of major Western financial institutions.

They further argue that the simultaneous commitment of vast sums to artificial intelligence infrastructure represents another layer of concentrated financial risk, increasing overall systemic vulnerability.

Glossary

Leverage ratio – the relationship between a bank's total assets and its capital.

Non-performing loan – a loan on which scheduled repayments have effectively ceased.

────────────────────────────

5. UKRAINE - A FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE

The same framework is applied to Ukraine.

Western governments, investment funds and financial institutions hold substantial quantities of Ukrainian sovereign debt. Some investors reportedly purchased these bonds at distressed prices, anticipating eventual repayment under favourable political outcomes.

According to this interpretation, recognising military defeat would transform impaired assets into realised losses. That prospect creates powerful incentives to continue financial and political support.

Supporters argue that this helps explain why negotiated settlements remain politically difficult despite mounting costs.

Critics would counter that governments continue supporting Ukraine primarily because of security concerns, alliance commitments and deterrence against future aggression.

Which thesis is the more credible?

Glossary

Repo market – the market where financial institutions obtain short-term funding using securities as collateral.

Temporary impairment – an accounting treatment allowing losses to remain unrealised while recovery is still considered possible.

────────────────────────────

6. WHEN MARKETS STOP REFLECTING EVENTS

Perhaps the most controversial evidence concerns commodity markets.

In 2019, attacks upon Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq processing facility triggered one of history's largest single-day increases in oil prices.

Supporters of this theory argue that subsequent attacks producing comparable or greater disruption generated surprisingly muted or even negative price movements. They interpret this divergence as evidence of intervention, aggressive short selling or official efforts to maintain market confidence.

Alternative explanations also exist. Modern oil markets possess greater spare capacity, more sophisticated hedging instruments and different expectations than existed several years earlier.

Nevertheless, repeated discrepancies between geopolitical risk and commodity pricing inevitably raise questions regarding price discovery.

Glossary

Price discovery – the process through which markets establish prices by matching buyers and sellers.

Naked short selling – selling securities without first borrowing them or confirming delivery.

────────────────────────────

7. THE ENDGAME: INFLATION RATHER THAN COLLAPSE

The final stage of this argument concerns crisis management.

During the financial crisis of 2008, governments openly recapitalised banks. Today, central banks possess far greater capacity to create liquidity electronically.

Supporters argue this makes outright banking collapse less likely. Instead, losses may be absorbed gradually through monetary expansion.

History offers several examples where excessive money creation preserved financial institutions but significantly reduced purchasing power. Weimar Germany, Zimbabwe and Argentina are frequently cited, although each emerged under very different political and economic circumstances.

Under this scenario, inflation becomes a hidden method of distributing banking losses across society ie savers, rather than concentrating them within financial institutions.

For savvy investors, this interpretation often leads to increased allocations towards physical precious metals, diversified real assets, liquidity held outside highly leveraged institutions and reduced dependence upon debt.

Glossary

Quantitative easing – central bank creation of money to purchase financial assets or provide liquidity.

Monetary debasement – reduction in a currency's purchasing power through expansion of the money supply.

────────────────────────────

8. WHY THIS THEORY DESERVES SERIOUS CONSIDERATION

The argument presented here should not be accepted uncritically.

Several claims remain difficult to verify independently, while some depend upon assumptions regarding the motivations of governments, central banks and financial institutions.

Yet the framework possesses internal consistency. It links energy, finance, banking leverage, geopolitics and monetary policy into a single explanatory model. We have seen this understanding elsewhere: liquidity from the banking system is dirrected into finanacially attractive assets, that then hit economics and eventually geopolitics supports this flow.

Individual equity values reflect their performance and prospects as corporate entities. But the market as a whole takes its value from the availability of credit for investment. In 2013, the S&P was 1,500 and the amount of credit leverage was $2 trillion. In March this year, credit leverage was $9.4 trillion, and the S&P was 6850. Both credit and the index have increased slightly more than 4.5 times.

 (Michael Howell)

Whether entirely correct or only partially so, it raises important questions.

If the true strategic asset is not oil itself but the dollar-denominated central banking system that finances global energy production, then today's conflicts are about securing battlefields to preserve the bond market's financial balance sheets.

────────────────────────────

9. THE BOTTOM LINE

The central proposition is straightforward. Energy remains the foundation of industrial civilisation.

The US dollar remains the principal financial infrastructure through which much of that energy is financed.

If Western banks have become heavily leveraged upon that system, then military defeat carries consequences extending far beyond geopolitics and hegemonic survival, defeat threatens the integrity of the financial architecture itself.

Whether one agrees with every conclusion or not, this is how to view the wars of the twenty-first century. It suggests that the real battlefield may not be oilfields, pipelines or front lines... It is the balance sheets of the global financial system.

────────────────────────────

References

• Daniel Yergin, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power

• Daniel Yergin, The New Map

• Michael Hudson, Super Imperialism

• David Graeber, Debt: The First 5,000 Years

• Bank for International Settlements (BIS), annual banking statistics. 

• International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook. 

• US Energy Information Administration (EIA), international petroleum data. 

• International Monetary Fund (IMF), Global Financial Stability Reports.

Saturday, 25 July 2026

WHO SHOULD DECIDE WHAT CITIZENS ARE ALLOWED TO SEE

● Living in the Air · Propaganda & Governance

Who Should Decide What Citizens Are Allowed to See

Beneath France's new push against “disinformation” sits an older and harder question: who gets to decide what a citizen may see, read, and share?

21 July 2026  ·  Translated & adapted for English readers

“La France va tout bloquer” — France is about to lock it all down. That's the blunt version circulating online. The measured version is subtler, and more unsettling.

This piece covers
— France's new proposals for regulating online information — Who really controls platform algorithms
— Disinformation vs. misinformation vs. malinformation — The case being made for tighter regulation
— What's at stake for free expression — The risk to democratic pluralism
01  A new phase in information control

France appears to be moving toward a significant expansion of its power to intervene in how information circulates on social media.



The sharper reading

France wants full control over every social media platform operating within its borders.

The stated goal is to protect upcoming elections from manipulation, coordinated influence campaigns, and foreign interference — a concern shared by many democracies grappling with the power of major platforms. It is not uniquely French.

But some observers argue the tools being proposed reach far beyond simply combating false information.

The sharper reading

This is the end of democracy in France.

The real debate, then, isn't only about disinformation. It's about the line between protecting democratic debate and controlling it.


Disinformation
The deliberate spreading of false or misleading information.

Pluralism
The coexistence of differing viewpoints within democratic debate.

02  The birth of information “grey zones”

One significant shift is the widening of categories that could become subject to regulation. This would no longer be limited to punishing outright falsehoods — it could extend to content judged capable of creating a “distorted perception of reality,” even when built on accurate facts.

The sharper reading

They want the power to punish people who aren't lying.

This distinction — between disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation — is probably the most contentious part of the proposals. Critics worry it would gradually turn fact-checking into interpretation-checking.

The sharper reading

They'll be prosecuting thoughtcrime.

The legal problem becomes genuinely difficult here: when a fact is accurate but framed provocatively or critically, at what point does it stop being an opinion and start being treated as a threat to public debate? That is precisely the line now generating so much anxiety.

Malinformation
Using accurate information in a context judged likely to cause harm.

Misinformation
Spreading inaccurate information without deliberate intent to deceive.

03  Who controls the algorithm?

Parliamentary hearings appear to have exposed a gap between how platforms actually work and what some officials expect of them. Representatives from YouTube and X pointed out that their systems mainly recommend content matching each user's own viewing habits, not a single editorial line — meaning two people can see very different recommendations purely because their browsing histories differ.

Some lawmakers nonetheless believe this personalization fuels informational bubbles, and want more transparency — or more control.

The sharper reading

They want to decide which videos get promoted.

Critics respond that tighter control over recommendations could — intentionally or not — end up favouring certain narratives over others. The debate ultimately pits two philosophies against each other: should the algorithm serve individual preference, or should it be made to serve a state-defined “public interest”?

Algorithm
The set of computational rules that determines what content is shown to a user.

Informational bubble
An environment in which a user mostly sees content that matches their existing preferences.

04  “Trusted” media

Another idea on the table: officially flagging certain sources as especially reliable. Supporters say this would help citizens separate real journalism from online rumour.

The sharper reading

They'll pick the “trusted” outlets and quietly bury the rest.

Opponents fear such a system would create an official hierarchy of information. The obvious question follows: who decides the criteria for that label? Even framed with protective intent, several analysts note the mechanism could favour certain actors at the expense of others — narrowing, over time, the diversity of opinion actually available to the public.

05  ARCOM and the power to punish

The proposals also envision expanded powers for France's media regulator, ARCOM. Supporters argue current tools are too slow to keep up with fast-moving manipulation campaigns.

The sharper reading

Give ARCOM sweeping new power to punish people even when they haven't lied.

Critics see this differently: an expansion of sanctioning power that could set a significant precedent, opening the door to much broader intervention in online content generally. The balance being sought is genuinely delicate — how do you protect public discourse from manipulation without eroding the freedom to speak?

06  The case for, the case against

Both sides of this argument have real substance behind them.

The case for reform

Democracies now face sophisticated manipulation campaigns that exploit social media to shape public opinion at scale.

Leaving platforms to self-regulate, on this view, hands over an essential piece of democratic infrastructure to private companies with no accountability to voters.

The case against

The state should never hold the power to arbitrate which opinions are acceptable to hold.

Once the tools of control exist, nothing guarantees a future, less scrupulous government won't inherit and use them. Emergency powers granted for one purpose have a long history of outliving their original justification.

07  A question bigger than France

This debate isn't purely a French problem. The UK, the EU, the US, Australia, and numerous other democracies are wrestling with the same three-way tension: free expression, resistance to digital manipulation, and s0-called "protection" of the electoral process.

Everywhere, the same question resurfaces: how far can a democratic state go in policing information before it becomes a neo-totalitarian arbiter of public debate itself?

This isn't a clean choice between absolute freedom and absolute control. The real task is preserving a space where citizens can keep confronting different - even uncomfortable, to the ruling elite - ideas, while limiting or masking deliberate manipulation campaigns. That balance is hard to strike. And it is precisely in moments of political tension that free expression and pluralism are tested most severely.

Free expression
The right to communicate one's opinions within the limits set by law.

Democratic pluralism
The durable existence of a genuine diversity of thought, media, and opinion that makes real public debate possible.

Who decides — and who watches the ones who decide?

Translated and adapted from the original FrenchLiving in the Air, 21 July 2026

livingintheair.org

00-01-03 FROM COAST TO COAST TO COMMAND OF THE SEA

BOOK ONE - CHAPTER THREE
28 June 2026

From Continental Republic to Maritime Superpower

How the United States Changed Its Grand Strategy

Why would a country that spent a century fighting for land suddenly decide the ocean mattered more?


From Coast to Coast to Command of the Seas


Fast-track overview (30 second read)

The United States began as a continental power, expanding across North America through purchase, diplomacy and war. Once it reached the Pacific, land conquest stopped paying off - so it pivoted to trade, and trade needed a navy. That pivot, shaped by thinkers like Alfred Thayer Mahan, turned a continental republic into the world's dominant maritime power.


The United States did not begin life as a maritime power. For much of the nineteenth century, it behaved like a classic continental state, expanding across North America through diplomacy, purchase and war. Only later did it adopt the maritime strategy that would make it the world's leading global power. This chapter based on lectures given by Sarah Paine traces that shift - and why it matters for understanding American strategy today.

Contents cover the following:

1. America Begins as a Continental Power
2. Expansion Across a Continent
3. The Monroe Doctrine
4. Reaching the Pacific Changes Everything
5. The Great Strategic Transformation
6. Lessons from America's Evolution

Why it matters

Understanding this shift explains why the United States still organises its power around naval dominance and open sea lanes rather than territorial control - a strategic instinct with roots stretching back over a century, and one still shaping today's great power competition.


1. America Begins as a Continental Power

When the United States declared independence in 1776, its principal concern was not overseas trade or global influence. It was survival.

The young republic occupied a narrow strip along the Atlantic coast. To the west lay vast territories controlled by Native American nations, France and Spain. To the north stood British Canada, while the Gulf of Mexico remained under foreign control.

Like other continental powers, the United States viewed territorial expansion as the path to security and prosperity. Its strategic objective was straightforward: reach the Pacific Ocean.

Glossary

Continental power - a state whose security depends primarily upon controlling and defending land territory.

Territorial expansion - the acquisition of additional land through purchase, settlement, diplomacy or conquest.


2. Expansion Across a Continent

Sarah Paine points out that America expanded differently from many earlier continental empires. Whenever possible, it preferred diplomacy and financial negotiation over military conquest.

- The Louisiana Purchase (1803) from France doubled the country's size.
- The Adams-Onis Treaty (1819) secured Florida from Spain.
- The Alaska Purchase (1867) transferred Russian America to the United States.

When negotiation failed, however, force followed. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) resulted in the annexation of vast territories including present-day California, Nevada, Utah and much of Arizona and New Mexico.

Paine notes that even the United States, often viewed today as a maritime power, spent much of its early history behaving like a continental state.

Glossary

Manifest Destiny - the nineteenth-century belief that the United States was destined to expand across North America.

Checkbook diplomacy - achieving strategic objectives through financial agreements rather than military force.


3. The Monroe Doctrine

In 1823, President James Monroe announced what became known as the Monroe Doctrine. European powers were warned against establishing new colonies or interfering in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.

In practice, the United States lacked the military strength to enforce this declaration. The British Royal Navy largely upheld it because Britain also wished to prevent rival European empires from re-establishing colonial monopolies in the Americas.

Even so, the Monroe Doctrine illustrates continental thinking. It asserted an exclusive sphere of influence rather than promoting an open international order.

Glossary

Sphere of influence - a region in which one great power claims predominant political or strategic influence.

Open international order - a system of international relations based on agreed rules, open trade, freedom of navigation and respect for national sovereignty. Supporters argue it promotes growth and reduces conflict; critics contend it can reflect the interests of the most powerful states.

Monroe Doctrine - an American foreign policy declaration issued in 1823 opposing further European colonial expansion in the Americas.


4. Reaching the Pacific Changes Everything

By the late nineteenth century, the United States had achieved what earlier generations sought: it stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and its continental frontier was largely complete.

This transformed America's strategic position. No longer focused solely on acquiring territory, it could increasingly turn towards overseas commerce. Industrialisation generated enormous productive capacity; factories required export markets, and imports became equally important. Trade replaced land acquisition as the principal engine of national wealth.

This was precisely the environment in which Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas gained influence. He argued that national greatness depended not upon conquering more territory but upon protecting maritime trade through naval power. His ideas profoundly influenced American policymakers.

Glossary

Industrialisation - the transition from an agricultural economy to one based upon manufacturing and industry.

Naval power - the ability to protect commerce and project national influence through maritime forces.


5. The Great Strategic Transformation

Sarah Paine argues that this marked one of the most important shifts in American history. The United States did not abandon its continental foundations. Rather, it added a maritime dimension to its strategy.

Its geography now offered exceptional advantages: two great oceans protected its flanks, abundant natural resources supported industry, navigable rivers connected the interior, and expanding ports linked America to global markets.

Few countries possessed such a favourable combination of continental resources and maritime access. During the twentieth century these advantages enabled the United States to emerge as the world's foremost maritime power while retaining the industrial strength of a continental economy.

Glossary

Grand strategy - the long-term coordination of diplomatic, military, economic and political power to achieve national objectives.

Maritime strategy - a strategy centred upon naval strength, overseas commerce and secure sea communications.


6. Lessons from America's Evolution

Paine's historical survey illustrates an important principle. Geography provides opportunities, but it takes strategy for nations to exploit them.

America's rise was not inevitable. Its leaders gradually recognised that once continental expansion had been completed, future prosperity depended less upon acquiring additional land and more upon protecting international trade, maintaining secure sea lanes and building alliances.

This transformation laid the foundations for the modern international order that emerged after the Second World War. In the next chapter we examine the thinker who explained why this maritime transformation mattered so profoundly: Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan.


Bottom Line

The United States began as a continental republic. During the nineteenth century it expanded across North America through diplomacy, purchase and war. Once that expansion ended, its strategic outlook changed fundamentally - from security through territory to prosperity through commerce and security through command of the seas.

What is original here is the framing: America's maritime rise is often told as destiny, but Paine's account - and this chapter's - shows it as a pivot, a strategic choice made only once continental options were exhausted. That reframing matters for how we read rising powers today, including those still in their continental phase.

Next in the series: the man whose ideas gave this pivot its intellectual foundation - Alfred Thayer Mahan.


Test Me

- If America's continental frontier had not closed when it did, do you think the maritime pivot would have happened at all - or happened differently?
- Britain enforced the Monroe Doctrine for its own reasons, not America's. Where else in history has one power's strategy been upheld by another power's self-interest?
- Paine frames geography as opportunity, not destiny. What other nation today sits on geographic advantages it has not yet turned into strategy?


Related Articles

Parts 1 and 2 in this series are already published:

Part 1: Continental and Maritime Powers

Part 2: Thinkers Who Changed How We See Power

Parts 4, 5 and 6 are in publication.


Further Reading

Max Otte:

https://youtu.be/riz5hs2fkGo?is=qaPwqMYrdY54RiIC

https://youtu.be/tJWqn9I4sYU?is=0Dr04kIUNg9H-0ta

https://youtu.be/HC3RIAVQ9dY?is=WP737dyTJoZR9rpU

Sarah Paine - playlist:

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd7-bHaQwnthnOed1a85mF7L-Ki3kdiqp&si=nulceh38zApV0n8v


References

Sarah C. M. Paine, The Strategy of Strategy: Rethinking War and Peace.

Alfred Thayer Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power upon History (1890).

James Monroe, Seventh Annual Message to Congress (Monroe Doctrine), 2 December 1823.

Walter A. McDougall, Promised Land, Crusader State (1997).