Showing posts with label #Propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Propaganda. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 December 2025

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT PROPAGANDA

12 December 2025

How your attitudes are shaped, without your realising it.


PROPAGANDA: HOW MODERN SOCIETIES ARE SHAPED WITHOUT REALISING IT

Taken together, the ten articles summarised here explore propaganda not as crude lies imposed from above, but as a subtle, pervasive system that shapes attitudes, narrows "permissible" thought, and conditions populations to accept their elite by taking down their resistance. Drawing on thinkers such as Jacques Ellul and observing contemporary media, war reporting, and political discourse, the series shows how propaganda works through repetition, emotional framing, moral binaries, and the implicit - systemic really - the implicit, system-driven alignment of governments, journalists, analysts, think tanks and cultural institutions. This doesn't require "managing" or intervention or coordination, only shared assumptions

It is most effective precisely because it feels normal, humanitarian, and rational - because it presents itself as common sense rather than persuasion. Propaganda in modern societies is self-organising. Whether examining war narratives, journalism’s loss of scepticism, the theatricalisation of politics, or the psychological exhaustion of Western societies, the core argument remains the same: modern propaganda does not demand belief, it demands acquiescence. It replaces debate with reflex, doubt with certainty, and citizenship with spectatorship. 

The danger is not merely that we are misinformed, but that we gradually lose the capacity - and even the desire - to think independently.


1. JACQUES ELLUL – THE FORMATION OF ATTITUDES

This post draws on Jacques Ellul’s insight that modern propaganda does not primarily aim to persuade us with arguments, but to shape our attitudes over time. Ellul explains how constant exposure to simplified narratives, repetition, and emotional framing gradually conditions individuals to accept certain positions as “normal” or “obvious", long before any explicit opinion is formed. The article argues that modern citizens mistake information overload for freedom of thought, when in reality it produces conformity and passivity.


2. PROPAGANDA, THE WAY IT WORKS, THE HARM IT DOES

This article explains propaganda as a psychological system rather than a set of lies. It shows how slogans, moral binaries, and emotional triggers short-circuit rational thought, encouraging people to react rather than reflect - this is very important to understand, and a proper understanding of propaganda requires knowing the methods and tools employed and just how calculating the campaign is and how coordination is achieved at the system level. The harm lies not only in false beliefs, but in the erosion of independent judgement, social trust, and nuance. Over time, propaganda damages democratic culture by replacing reasoning with reflex and a kind of conditioned instinct.


3. PROPAGANDA FIT FOR THE EDINBURGH FRINGE

Using satire and irony, this post compares modern war propaganda to a theatrical performance - exaggerated, repetitive, Punch and Judy almost, and designed for applause rather than truth. It argues that many media narratives are so absurdly scripted that they resemble fringe comedy, except with deadly consequences. The piece highlights how certainty, moral grandstanding, and simplification replace serious analysis, turning war into entertainment for distant audiences. "Politics is the entertainment division of the MIC."


4. JOURNALISM AS PROPAGANDA

This article argues that journalism has increasingly abandoned its role as a sceptical check on power and become a transmission belt for elite narratives. Rather than investigating, challenging, contextualising, much of the media now amplifies official positions while marginalising dissent. The post shows how framing, omission, and selective outrage can be as powerful as outright censorship in shaping public perception.


5. THE EFFECT OF TROLLS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE

This post examines the real and exaggerated role of online trolls in the Ukraine conflict. It argues that while information warfare exists, blaming “trolls” often serves as a convenient excuse to dismiss legitimate scepticism and policy failure. The deeper problem, the article suggests, is not manipulation by outsiders but the fragility of public trust and the unwillingness of elites to tolerate dissent.


6. WESTERN GOVTS, ANALYSTS AND MEDIA – HOW PROPAGANDA WORKS

Here, the focus is on the alignment between governments, think tanks, analysts, and media organisations. The article explains how a narrow consensus forms, how soft power works -  career incentives, access journalism, reputational risk. Once established, this consensus polices itself, marginalising alternative views without needing explicit coordination. Propaganda emerges as a systemic outcome, not a conspiracy. Question outside the box and a journalist loses influence and access and gets relegated to podcasts, substack, the bloggosphere.


7. PROPAGANDA PODCAST

This post introduces and frames this podcast series, which is dedicated to unpacking and "de-fanging" propaganda in modern politics and war. It emphasises slow thinking, historical context, and scepticism as antidotes to emotional manipulation and the tools of the propagandaist's trade. The aim is not to replace one narrative with another, but to help listeners recognise techniques of persuasion and reclaim a minimum of intellectual autonomy.


8. THIS IS NOT OUR WAR

This article challenges the claim that the Ukraine war is a moral crusade binding all Europeans. It argues that public consent has been manufactured through fear, moral pressure, and selective information. The post questions whose interests are truly served and warns that democratic legitimacy erodes when populations are told a war is inevitable, righteous, and beyond debate.


9. IS AMERICA’S MADNESS REVERSIBLE?

This piece reflects on the United States’ political and psychological trajectory, describing a society locked in permanent crisis mode. It argues that constant outrage, polarisation, and moral absolutism are symptoms of deeper institutional and cultural breakdown. The article asks whether restraint, pluralism, and self-doubt — once American strengths — can be recovered, or whether the system now feeds on permanent instability.


10. THE WEST HAS BEEN DEFEATED IN UKRAINE, BUT IS IN DENIAL OF THE…

This post argues that the West has already lost strategically in Ukraine, but cannot admit it without confronting deeper failures of leadership, planning, and honesty. Rather than reassessing, elites double down on narrative control to delay political consequences. The article frames denial as a final stage of propaganda - not to mobilise victory, but to postpone accountability.


1. JACQUES ELLUL – THE FORMATION OF ATTITUDES

https://www.livingintheair.org/2024/09/jacques-ellul-the-formation-of-attitudes.html


2. PROPAGANDA: THE WAY IT WORKS, THE HARM IT DOES
https://www.livingintheair.org/2022/06/propaganda-the-way-it-works-the-harm-it-does-us.html


3. PROPAGANDA FIT FOR THE EDINBURGH FRINGE
https://www.livingintheair.org/2024/09/propaganda-fit-for-the-edinburgh-fringe.html


4. JOURNALISM AS PROPAGANDA
https://www.livingintheair.org/2022/07/journalism-as-propaganda.html


5. THE EFFECT OF TROLLS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE
https://www.livingintheair.org/2023/07/the-effect-of-trolls-on-the-outcome-of-the-war-in-ukraine.html


6. WESTERN GOVTS, ANALYSTS AND MEDIA – HOW PROPAGANDA WORKS
https://www.livingintheair.org/2022/08/western-govts-analysts-and-media-how-propaganda-works.html


7. PROPAGANDA PODCAST
https://www.livingintheair.org/2024/12/propaganda-podcast.html


8. THIS IS NOT OUR WAR
https://www.livingintheair.org/2025/05/this-is-not-our-war.html


9. IS AMERICA’S MADNESS REVERSIBLE?
https://www.livingintheair.org/2024/01/is-americas-madness-reversible.html


10. THE WEST HAS BEEN DEFEATED IN UKRAINE, BUT IS IN DENIAL OF THE…
https://www.livingintheair.org/2025/03/the-west-has-been-defeated-in-ukraine-but-is-in-denial.html

IN SUMMARY...

Propaganda today isn’t about telling crude lies. It works by shaping attitudes through repetition, emotion, and “common sense” narratives, aligning media, experts, and elite. 

Its real effect isn’t to make us believe everything, but to narrow what can be questioned... in effect, propaganda replaces real debate with an instinctive purely emotional reflex and turns us into spectators.... it's not enough to think that we are above such manipulation, we aren't, we need to be aware, all we have in self-defense is knowledge of the methods and techniques used and the end purposes and outcomes sought by the manipulators.

Take care!

Thursday, 5 December 2024

PROPAGANDA PODCAST

6 December 2024

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/2944804a-e048-4ef4-a33b-b6c89a6b3fa6/audio

Sunday, 22 September 2024

THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN PROLONGING THE WAR IN UKRAINE

22 September 2024

THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN HELPING THE WEST ACCEPT DEFEAT IN UKRAINE


Ukraine has run out of men, equipment, munitions, transport and supplies, the war is more or less lost, but the Mainstream Media is holding back on an honest debate with the public. 

It’s no good labelling Putin a monster or the second coming of the moustachioed or accusing him of wanting to rebuild the Russian Empire or claiming sanctions will wreck the Russian economy or insisting that Ukraine can retake all land lost since 1991 or insisting on the strategic defeat of Russia.

Fact is, this war is un-winnable and the media should be supplying the information to support a wholesome, open discussion of alternatives to current military and economic strategies. The MSM needs to fulfil its traditional role in a democracy of helping to adapt the public to reality by generating options for debate. 

This war cannot be won and was wrong-headed from the get-go. Progress and prosperity need global peace and stability and we need to adapt to the reality of defeat before it's too late.

SUMMARY

1. Are Western media outlets asking tough questions about the West's current strategy in Ukraine, or is dissent being suppressed?

2. Is the mainstream media failing to honestly discuss whether Ukraine can realistically win the war with the current levels of Western support?

3. Should the media encourage a public debate about alternative strategies, including negotiations, as Western military and economic support wanes?

A RANGE OF QUESTIONS

Here are some questions that the mainstream media could be discussing in order to smooth the process towards adaption and acceptance of defeat.

Are we asking enough hard questions about the West's current policy in Ukraine - we surely don’t want a repeat of the Iraq war experience when Western media failed to question the WDM claims?

Are we allowing a fair and open debate on Ukraine, or is challenging Western strategy being dismissed as defeatist or pro-Russian?

Are we overlooking the need to question whether the war in Ukraine is actually winnable, given the power of Putin’s Russia as demonstrated every day on the battlefields?

Are we scrutinising these claims of Western invincibility enough, because sanctions seem to have backfired badly on Europe and if it came to a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia it is by no means obvious that NATO could prevail and there would likely be a World War 3 with the threat of nuclear escalation?

Why isn’t the possibility of a defeat on the battlefield for the West being discussed more in mainstream forums, we can see Russia’s capacity and the depletion of Western military supplies?

Why are we avoiding deeper discussions on whether current strategies are sustainable, and instead pushing optimistic narratives, this stops us from developing compromise strategies or ways of preparing and managing defeat and risks making the final shocks even more shattering?

Wouldn’t it make sense to rethink whether retaking all of Ukraine, including Crimea, is realistic, fact is there is no clarity on the West’s war aims beyond backing Ukraine “for as long as it takes” - takes what?

How realistic is it for Ukraine to win with current Western support levels unable to match Russia's, not in troop numbers, not in equipment and not in munitions?

Scholz has suggested negotiations, why is this not being seriously considered or discussed by other Western leaders or in the MSM?

Are we being honest about the likelihood of victory, given that Ukraine’s Western allies may not have the capacity to continue supporting the war indefinitely?

What alternative approaches should Western leaders consider, given that the current strategy is not enough to achieve victory?

Are journalists asking these tough questions needed to hold leaders accountable in honest discussions about Ukraine’s future? The media is crucial to informed debate and adapting public opinion to reality, why isn't it happening, why are we stuck in a bubble of propaganda.

Who is responsible for handicapping debate? Is it the Mainstream Media or the politicians?