Sunday, 21 April 2024

ON FRANCE'S ECONOMY

21 April 2024


The article below highlights the complex interplay between political ambition, economic realities, and societal expectations that have been shaping Macron's presidency.

This is a balanced appreciation, but let's not overlook the underlying strengths of the French economy, despite the challenges described below posed by high public spending and national debt. 

The improvements in the labour market, the diversified economic base, and the strategic investments in infrastructure and innovation are pivotal in maintaining France's economic stability and growth prospects.

STRENGTHS OF THE FRENCH ECONOMY

1. Robust Labour Market Reforms

One of the strongest points in favor of the French economy today is the significant improvement in the labour market, primarily due to Macron's reforms. 

These reforms have helped lower the unemployment rate from nearly 10% when Macron took office to about 7.4% as of early 2024. Key initiatives like making it less costly for firms to sack workers and reducing business taxes have incentivised hiring, especially benefiting younger demographics. The employment rate for 15 to 24-year-olds hit a record high of 35.3% at the end of the previous year, showing the success of policies aimed at integrating more people into the workforce.

2. Diversified and Resilient Economic Sectors

The French economy benefits from a well-diversified economic base that includes strong sectors such as tourism, manufacturing, and services - subject of a previous post here. 

France is a global leader in several industries, including luxury goods, aerospace, and automotive sectors. This diversification helps cushion the economy against sector-specific downturns and provides a stable and supportive ground for economic growth. Moreover, France's position as a leading tourist destination enhances its economic resilience, contributing significantly to its GDP.

3. Strong Public Infrastructure and Investment in Innovation

France's commitment to maintaining robust public infrastructure and its continuous investment in innovation are crucial for its economic strength. 

The country has one of the world’s best transportation networks, including high-speed rail lines and well-maintained highways, which facilitate efficient movement of goods and people. Additionally, France is committed to investing in new technologies and renewable energy, positioning itself as a leader in innovation and sustainable development. These investments not only foster economic growth but also attract foreign investment, further strengthening the French economy.


SUMMARY

1. Introduction to Macron's Economic Conundrum

Emmanuel Macron, elected French president in 2017, reelected 2022 for his final term, once labelled the "Mozart of Finance," embarked on an ambitious journey to overhaul France's economic landscape and address the soaring national debt. However, the challenges have been persistent, and the country now faces the risk of economic downgrade, posing a significant threat to Macron's reputation and the financial stability of France.²

2. Initial Economic Reforms and Challenges

After defeating Marine Le Pen in the presidential election, Macron introduced wide-ranging reforms aimed at revitalizing the French economy. Key initiatives included labor market reforms and tax reductions intended to boost employment and stimulate growth. Despite these efforts, Macron's tenure has been marred by public resistance, notably against changes to pensions and social welfare systems. His initial goal was to reduce the unemployment rate to 7%, a target partially achieved as it stood at 7.4% in February 2024.

3. Economic Performance Under Macron

Macron's economic strategy anticipated robust growth, yet the reality has been consistently underwhelming. France's GDP growth has lagged behind other major European economies, with the IMF revising its growth forecast for France downwards from an expected 1.4% to just 0.9% in the previous year. In comparison, countries like Spain are expected to grow at 1.9%. This sluggish growth exacerbates the difficulty in managing the national debt, which increased from 97% of GDP in 2019 to over 110% last year.

4. Fiscal Policy and Government Spending

One of Macron's key challenges has been reducing the budget deficit, which reached a high of 9% of GDP in 2020 due to the pandemic. Efforts to curb spending have been complicated by France's high social welfare costs, which are significantly greater than those in similar economies. Despite Macron's promises of fiscal prudence, the High Council of Public Finances has criticized the government's forecasts as overly optimistic.

5. Prospects for Macron's Economic Legacy

Looking ahead, the French government aims to reduce the deficit to 2.7% of GDP by 2027, a target met with skepticism by fiscal oversight bodies. Credit rating agencies are poised to review France's rating, with potential downgrades that could affect France's borrowing costs and economic credibility. Macron's legacy, therefore, hinges on his ability to implement and sustain fiscal reforms in a country resistant to austerity.

6. Mathematical Implications of Macron's Policies

Macron's reforms have not only been about changing numbers but understanding the underlying economic dynamics. For instance, the decrease in unemployment from almost 10% to 7.4% represents a significant improvement, albeit not at the ambitious 7% target. Moreover, the rise in national debt from 97% to 110% of GDP in just a few years underscores the challenges of fiscal management in times of crisis.

7. Conclusion

Macron's economic strategies, characterized by ambitious reforms and harsh realities, reflect the difficulty of transforming a national economy in the face of deep-rooted societal expectations and global economic pressures. The upcoming credit ratings will be crucial in determining the success of Macron's fiscal policies and his long-term impact on France's economic landscape.

Glossary of Terms

- *National Debt*: The total amount of money that a country's government has borrowed, typically as a result of deficit spending.
- *Budget Deficit*: The financial situation in which a government's expenditures exceed its revenues, resulting in the need to borrow money.
- *Fiscal Prudence*: The practice of being prudent and cautious in managing government spending and debt.

Further Reading

For more in-depth analysis and updates on France's economic policies under Macron:
- [International Monetary Fund (IMF) Reports](https://www.imf.org)
- [Official Statistics from Eurostat](https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat)

ARTICLE

Macron’s drastic miscalculation on the French national debt
Country braces for economic downgrade as its ‘Mozart of finance’ risks humiliation

Tim Wallace
21 April 2024 • 6:00am
Macron
Emmanuel Macron never showed any doubt in the scale of his ambitions, nor his chances of success.

Less than a year after defeating Marine Le Pen in the presidential elections, Macron said he had come to realise a “special responsibility” fell to him to transform France and its relationship with the wider world.

“The responsibility of building a prosperous France, a France which is open to the world but also capable of recognising and accepting and including those left behind by globalisation,” Macron said in a speech in 2018 held in Davos.

Among his proposals were plans to overhaul the welfare system, taxes, finance and education. The state would be slimmer, the economy stronger, the people more prosperous.

But beyond mere policy changes he also sought to transform the soul of the nation.

Getting into his stride in his first year in the Elysée – the first and only elected role he has ever held – the youthful head of state was entering his “Jupiterian” phase.

“Cultural change… is just as important as tangible reforms, laws and decrees,” he said at the Swiss resort.

From attitudes to risk and enterprise to the approach to work and benefits, he promised a historic change to the way the people of France behave and engage with the world.

The president’s approach to leadership, deemed aloof, was easy to mock. Cartoonists delighted in portraying Macron as Napoleon, drawing echoes with the Emperor’s boundless ambition and physical stature.

Emmanuel Macron
France was in Germany's shadow when Macron won power CREDIT: REUTERS/Philippe Wojazer
But it is harder to argue that France did not need a reset.

Macron promised to dispel the “misgivings, fears over globalisation” which he said had driven so many of his compatriots to the far-Right.

France had spent the best part of two decades in the shadow of Germany, which had undertaken its own economic transformation to shake off its old image as the “sick man of Europe” to emerge as the dominant political power and a seemingly unassailable industrial titan.

Fast forward to the present day and Macron is still promising a much-needed revitalisation of France.

Germany has stumbled, tripped up by the pandemic which hammered demand for its goods in China and then held down by the war in Ukraine which punished Berlin’s reckless reliance on cheap Russian gas.

But in France economic growth has also disappointed as Paris struggles to get its borrowing back under control.

Italy and Spain have emerged with more momentum. Even Greece, the basket case of the eurozone crisis, has come back strongly.

For all his promise as the vanquisher of the far-Right, Macron held off Le Pen by a smaller margin when he was reelected in 2022.

His party, rebranded as Renaissance last year, now trails her National Rally in the polls by a considerable margin.

Macron cannot run for a third term, so another candidate will be needed for the country’s elections in 2027. Meanwhile neither the Socialists nor the Republicans, the parties which have traditionally produced presidents, are in sight.


It all started so promisingly.

The month Macron declared victory over Le Pen, in May 2017, France’s unemployment rate stood at almost 10pc.

In contrast, this figure was 4.4pc in the UK and 3.6pc in Germany during the same period, according to the European statistics office Eurostat. 

A cornerstone of Macron’s vision for France was to bring this number down and ensure more people would be in work and for a greater number of years. 

Early on, he pledged to bring down the unemployment rate to 7pc. 

This has largely been an area characterised by success more so than failure, says Andrew Kenningham from Capital Economics.

“He’s been very successful with the labour market reforms, so the employment rate has risen very sharply,” says Kenningham.

“France has been an outlier in Europe in seeing employment growth. That’s largely because of the apprenticeship scheme, which has brought in a lot of younger people to the labour force.”

The latest monthly unemployment figure from February stood at 7.4pc - down more than two percentage points from when Macron took office. 

While critics would highlight that some of this decline is the result of reforms by successive governments over many years, Macron can afford to take some credit.

His policies have made it cheaper for firms to sack workers and have also slashed business taxes by €10bn (£8.6bn) to incentivise hiring. 

Macron’s push to get more young people into work has also paid dividends. 

The share of 15 to 24-year-olds in work was at a record high of 35.3pc at the end of last year, with comparable data stretching back to 2003.

But like other leaders before him, France’s youngest ever president has found his ambition to overhaul the economy tested by voters’ tireless willingness to protest. 

French CGT protesters
Many of Macron's reforms have been plagued by furious protests CREDIT: Mohamad Salaheldin Abdelg Alsayed/Anadolu via Getty Images
“In France they have this repeated problem of governments setting out with really good intentions to reduce the deficit and then being unable to do so,” says Kennington. “Part of the problem is that they have got embedded very high levels of social welfare payments.”

France’s tax burden is the highest in the OECD, a club of mostly rich countries. Tax revenues as a share of GDP stood at 46.1pc in 2022, ahead of even countries like Norway, Denmark and Sweden. 

Analysis by the International Monetary Fund suggests that the bulk of excess government expenditure compared with similar economies is on pensions and unemployment benefits. 

Reducing these types of spending has proved to be political dynamite. 

“Those benefits were established mainly back in the 1990s. Once you’ve got them embedded it is very difficult to roll them back,” adds Kenningham. “Successive governments have made efforts to reduce those liabilities for the taxpayer, but only made some pretty limited progress.”

Macron came up against such forces early in his first term. He was forced to abandon plans to increase fuel taxes in late 2018 as a peace offering to the gilets jaunes movement.

The protesters were behind the worst French riots in 50 years, sparked by anger over rising living costs and inequality. 

Macron, nicknamed the Mozart of Finance, then attempted to take on France’s generous pension system a year later, but quickly ran into similar issues and was forced to ultimately shelve the plans.

Shortly after, Covid hit and the French president vowed to do whatever it took to shield the population through the pandemic, putting pension reforms to one side. 

“He came back to the pension reforms in 2023,” says Kenningham. “But again they triggered very big protests. That resulted in the reforms being somewhat whittled down. They weren’t as radical as originally planned.”

France’s retirement age is one of the lowest among rich countries. Lifting it from 62 to 64 was met with an outpouring of public anger.


It has become a recurring problem for Macron. 

Earlier this year angry farmers stormed Paris with their tractors and forced the government to scrap an increase in agricultural fuel taxes.

It marked a retreat from last year, after ministers had sought to boost the net zero transition by removing a fiscal advantage for diesel used by farmers to boost public coffers. 

These hard-won economic reforms have not paid off as much as one might have hoped.

Growth in France has consistently disappointed forecasts since the pandemic.

In its first set of predictions after Russia invaded Ukraine, the International Monetary Fund in 2022 anticipated French GDP would grow steadily, if not spectacularly.

The story since has instead been one of steady underperformance.

Instead of growing by 1.4pc last year as hoped, the French economy only expanded by 0.9pc. 

This year, the IMF expects the country to slow again, anticipating growth of 0.7pc – less than half the pace of expansion it had anticipated in 2022. That is below the eurozone average, as France is left in the dust by Spain’s impressive 1.9pc forecast growth.


The only consolation is that Germany is doing far worse, with a predicted expansion of 0.2pc.

A further headache for Macron is France’s borrowing, which had sustained it throughout the pandemic and the Russia-induced energy crisis.

On the IMF’s measures, the budget deficit ballooned to a peak of 9pc of GDP in 2020, sending the national debt spiralling from 97pc of GDP in 2019 to just over 110pc last year.

Macron indicated that returning to fiscal sanity is a matter of historic importance to him.

“We are creating debt for our children,” he said in July 2022. “We increased our debt during the Covid-19 crisis.

“But before that our policy was one of budgetary prudence. We must go back to it.”

However, controlling borrowing was tough enough even before the crises of recent years – no French government has run a budget surplus since 1974.

Getting back into the black, or even just getting to more sustainable levels of borrowing, is proving easier said than done.

The IMF predicts the budget deficit will stay above 4pc until at least 2028, leaving France further in the red than any of the other major eurozone economies.

French national debt will rise steadily, reaching 115pc of GDP before the end of the decade, the IMF predicts, even as Germany reduces its own borrowing back to below pre-Covid levels of 60pc.


The French government claims it can slash borrowing more quickly, getting the deficit down to 2.7pc of GDP by 2027.

But the High Council of Public Finances – the country’s grandly named equivalent of Britain’s Office for Budget Responsibility – is sceptical.

Even after the government cut its predictions for economic growth, the body said “the potential GDP trajectory adopted is overestimated”.

That bodes ill for Macron’s hopes of getting borrowing under control.

“The return of the deficit below 3pc of GDP in 2027 would require a massive structural adjustment between 2023 and 2027 which, according to the government, would essentially be based on an effort to save money on spending,” the officials said.

“Ultimately, the High Council considers that the forecast presented by the government lacks credibility and consistency.”

The 3pc threshold highlighted by the High Council is important. Eurozone rules demand that countries run deficits below this level, and the European Commission can put nations into its excessive deficit procedure if they fail persistently.

This is effectively a nannying exercise, watching over the government’s shoulder to force it back on to the straight and narrow.

Those rules were suspended in 2020 and, after much negotiation, are coming back into force. France looks set to be a test case for the new regime and Brussels’ willingness to enforce the rules.

Failing to meet such a basic requirement on a seemingly permanent basis undermines France’s status as a core authority within the eurozone, as well as posing a threat to the country’s wider financial position.

It is also a personal humiliation for Macron and his dreams to revitalise the French economy and state.

Economists place the blame on the combination of weak growth and the traditional French dependence on high government spending.

Erik-Jan van Harn, at Rabobank, says Macron made a promising start, but seven years after he entered the Elysée, France’s political norms appear to be reasserting themselves.

“It is kind of a cultural thing. People expect a lot from the government,” he says.

“Macron tried to get the public finances back on track again when he started in 2017. Initially, he actually did pretty well. He also had a lot of luck, because the French economy did pretty well.

“But then Covid hit, then the energy crisis and right now it is really the question [of] whether he can make the hard decisions.”

Prior attempts to improve public finances such as controversially scrapping a tax on wealth and instead taxing property and setting a flat rate of 30pc on capital gains appear to have failed to boost income by much.

The uncomfortably large deficit also reflects a cultural view on debt, says Kenningham.  

“France’s political centre of gravity is different from that of Germany, for example,” he adds. “There, politicians compete to offer the most austere fiscal policy. They promise to keep to the balanced budget rule, their debt break, and that has a lot of popular support. In France, that’s absolutely not the case. You wouldn’t win elections by promising austerity.”

Bringing down the deficit is even more challenging because of the looming threat of war. While France has ramped up spending to boost its military capacities significantly, European leaders already acknowledge that more needs to be done.


Mabrouk Chetouane, at investment bank Natixis, says the fundamental problem is a lack of growth which has undermined tax revenues. He describes it as “the key explanation of this wipe-out” in government receipts.

“The French situation is the worst within the core countries of the eurozone,” he says.

Financial markets are becoming twitchy as a result.

Interest rates have risen globally in recent years, but the rate charged to the French government in financial markets has risen by more than that charged to Berlin. 

It suggests international investors are not entirely happy at the prospect of funding a yawning deficit indefinitely.

It also means Paris must pay a disproportionately large interest bill on its debt, which is on its way to double the size of Germany’s national debt.

Critical verdicts are due from the credit ratings agencies.

Moody’s is updating its rating on France next week, while Standard & Poor’s will do the same next month.

The financial analysts at the agencies give their verdict on the stability of the governments’ debts, and markets take them seriously.

The ratings take the form of a grade. S&P’s ranking of France is currently AA, but with a negative outlook. Economists suspect a downgrade could well be on the way.

At its previous update in December, S&P said: “We could lower our sovereign ratings on France within the next 12 months if we believe budget deficits would not fall sufficiently to lead to a reduction of the general government debt-to-GDP ratio, or if general-government interest payments increase beyond 5pc of general government revenue.”

Fitch, another agency, downgraded France last year. At the time it warned “rising interest expenses will make fiscal consolidation more challenging”.

That is to say, higher borrowing has led to higher debt interest bills, which in turn make it harder for Macron to get the deficit back down again.

Imogen Bachra, an analyst at NatWest, says any downgrade will be unhelpful for the government.

“It doesn’t help sentiment. In an environment when you are already worried about debt risks and how much that might weigh on rates going forwards, a ratings downgrade only adds to that negative sentiment,” she says.

This is not a crunch moment of the type seen at points in the eurozone crisis – France is still a very secure borrower. Bachra says: “I wouldn’t want to overstate the risks. We are still far from the point at which you worry about a debt spiral, in the sense that their interest payments become so high they can no longer service their debt and it runs out of control.”

That may offer little comfort to a hard-pressed government.

Plenty of countries are borrowing heavily. The US is running a budget deficit of around 7pc of GDP per year, a vast sum outside recession or war, meaning France has to compete for finance from international investors.

If bond investors do not like what they see, they may turn up their noses at the prospect of funding Macron’s long-term deficits.


Financiers can be fickle, as Britain found out under Liz Truss’s premiership.

The French government’s proposed solution is to hold back spending.

So far it has unveiled plans to cut €10bn this year and twice as much next. Longer-term plans may end up with cuts of €50bn in 2027 – restraint which in turn risks hitting economic growth, in a painful, if necessary, cycle.

Bruno Le Maire, the finance minister, has indicated welfare payments will bear much of the brunt, in an effort to save money while encouraging more people into work.

But there are a series of challenges which will make savings on this sort of scale distinctly tricky, says Thomas Gillet at Scope Ratings.

“Bringing everybody on board at all levels of public administration may take a bit of time. That is the first challenge,” he says.

“They will also need to implement difficult policy trade-offs. We all know France spends more than the rest of Europe on social protection, so they may want to cut social spending, which is another challenge in the current political environment.

“And the third point is that when we look at the stability programme, most of the consolidation efforts will be made by the government between 2025 and 2026. That may be challenging shortly ahead of the next general elections, in 2027.”

All of this has to be done without a majority in parliament, as Macron must now rely on the support of centre-right parties on an ad hoc basis to make any further serious changes.

Even if he can push the plans through parliament, there are dangers.

As interest rates hammer the budget with higher borrowing costs, the fear is that spending cuts risk undermining economic growth. In turn that hits tax receipts again.

“It is a vicious circle,” says Natixis’s Chetouane.

“We need to learn from what the US did, and what the eurozone did with Spain and Italy.”

That means borrowing to invest in growth, he suggests, rather than less productive spending.

The coming months include a series of critical tests for the president.

European elections in less than two months will allow voters to give their verdict on Renaissance, as well as a renewed platform for Le Pen to draw in supporters.

Then the Paris Olympics will showcase the country on the global stage in late July and early August.

The opening ceremony should give the President a chance to position himself at the front of the festivities, showing off France at its glittering best.

But he has already been forced to make some concessions to tighter security arrangements amid terror attack fears.

Last week he acknowledged the existence of contingency plans which could further slim down the opening ceremony, planned to take place along the banks of the Seine.

Recent photos released by the official presidential photographer showed Macron boxing, grimacing as he pummelled a punchbag, veins bulging in his arms.

The black and white images seemed designed to show a grittier, more determined side to the president.

He will need every ounce of his tenacity if he is to bounce back this summer, and make good on his early promises to revitalise the nation.

A SAFE STORE FOR YOUR MONEY

21 April 2024

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chart-assets-make-wealth/

Ray Dalio suggests considering several factors when identifying a good store of wealth, especially in times of inflation. These factors include:

1. **Inflation-Hedge Assets**: 

Dalio emphasizes the importance of investing in assets that traditionally perform well during periods of high inflation, such as TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) and other inflation-hedged bonds.

2. **Practical Investments**: 

He suggests investing in practical and essential items that you will need in the future ie buy now before prices go up. 

Like housing (your residence), education (paying forward your kids' education), and essentials like food and healthcare, where you can. 

Investments are likely to retain their value if they fulfill fundamental needs.

3. **Geographic Considerations**: 

Dalio advises considering stable countries that are economically balanced (where earnings exceed spending, balance sheets free of too much debt), socially cohesive (ie free from internal conflict) and countries without major international conflicts.

4. **Innovative and Technological Advancements**: 

Investments in cutting-edge technologies and sectors driving an intellectual revolution may offer good returns as these areas can be expected to grow and adapt over time.

5. **Diversification**: 

A critical strategy Dalio highlights is diversification, which reduces risks - as much as 80% - without necessarily compromising returns. He stresses the importance of not putting all financial resources into one type of investment or market.

6. **Understanding the Financial System and Currency Value**: 

In the context of depreciating currency values globally, Dalio notes the relative strength or weakness of currencies should not be the sole factor in determining a good store of wealth, as most currencies are losing buying power. 

Instead, the focus should be on assets that can safeguard against inflation and maintain purchasing power over time.

Dalio’s perspective is that in selecting a store of wealth, one should consider assets that not only preserve value in challenging economic times but also provide essential benefits, are diversified, and adapt to technological progress and global economic shifts.

LINKS

Ray Dalio - The great reset has begun
https://youtu.be/5LI6thghhRI?si=kXZkfT24KyTTVCkR


where the super rich store their money
https://www.dontwasteyourmoney.com/super-rich-store-money/

THE RIGHT COLOURS FOR PAINTING YOUR HOUSE

21 April 2024

COLOUR CONSIDERATIONS FOR INSIDE

**1. Light and Space Perception:**


   - Lighter colours, such as soft blues, greens, and beiges, can make a room feel larger and more open.


   - Darker shades, like charcoal or navy, can bring a cozy and more intimate feel to a space but may make it appear smaller.


**2. Colour Psychology:**


   - Blue is calming and serene, suitable for bedrooms and bathrooms.

   - Green, symbolising nature, is restful for the eyes and works well in almost any room.

   - Yellow can be energising and uplifting, ideal for kitchens and dining areas.

   - Red can stimulate conversation and appetite, making it a popular choice for dining rooms.


**3. Lighting:**


   - Consider the room’s natural light exposure. 


North-facing rooms can benefit from warm colours to lift the space, while south-facing rooms might handle cooler tones well.


**4. Functionality:**


   - Kitchens benefit from clean and fresh colours like whites or light grays.

   - Bedrooms often suit calming shades like soft blues or greens.

   - Living areas can vary widely depending on personal taste and the atmosphere you wish to create.

COLOUR CONSIDERATIONS FOR OUTSIDE

Choosing the right colour for painting the exterior of your house involves several considerations that balance aesthetics, practicality, and the surroundings. 

Choose a colour that you like of course, but also a colour that enhances the functionality and that will appeal to your visitors.

Here are some things to help you decide:

**1. Architectural Style:**

   - Different architectural styles often suit particular colour schemes. For instance, older more ornamental homes might look great in bold, complex colour schemes, while modern minimalist homes often feature monochrome or neutral palettes.

**2. Local Climate:**

   - Lighter colours reflect more sunlight and can keep your home cooler in hot climates.
   - Darker colours absorb heat and can be beneficial in colder climates but may fade faster under intense sun.

**3. Neighbourhood Context:**

   - Consider the prevailing colour schemes in your neighbourhood. Choosing a colour that complements the surrounding homes can enhance aesthetic harmony and could potentially affect resale value.

**4. Durability:**

   - Some colours tend to maintain their appearance longer. Earth tones, tans, and beiges are less likely to fade than darker shades.
   - High-quality exterior paint in a suitable finish (e.g., satin or semi-gloss) can help colours last longer and provide easier maintenance.

**5. Personal Preference and Trends:**

   - While personal taste is crucial, it's also wise to consider current trends if resale value is a consideration. Neutral colours like whites, grays, and gray-browns are generally safe and popular choices.
   - Bold colors can be used for accents on doors or shutters to add character without overwhelming.

**6. Landscaping:**

   - Consider how the house colour will look with your garden and the surrounding landscape. Green, earth tones can blend beautifully with natural settings; brighter colours might complement a more cultivated or floral landscape.

Testing paint colors in a small area before committing to the entire house can also be a practical approach.


Saturday, 20 April 2024

HOW TO SAVE BRITAIN FROM THE NEW ELITE

20 April 2024




It's about "the culture wars", the failure of multiculturism, but much more. The idea that most people feel they have a vote but not a voice, they are not listened to anymore. There is "a new elite" from the universities who make a clean sweep of all the institutions with their "woke" ideology that has appeal only within this haughty new ruling group.

So people, ordinary folk, 80% maybe of voters, switch off as they are baffled and "unherd".

Immigration is the most obvious thwarting of the popular will. But all the woke ideologies stuff favouring minorities or denigrating our past irk most people.

Especially when you consider that reality for most of us is elsewhere - tax rises and service cuts, inflation and tricky stats, house prices and wage stagnation. Savage wars on countries that do not threaten us, when the real enemy is seen as within. Immigration and culture shifts are not welcome, stability and managed change is wanted.

Not that Starmer's New Labour is any better - I'm just waiting to hear how they've abandoned their traditional values - and so voters - too. Betrayed, really.

Political scientists like to talk about a "realignment", they'll tell you about Thatcher and Blair and now Woke v. Populism - the culture wars, they observe we are in "a time of transition". If you're mystified or annoyed by the politics of this new elite, shouldn't you focus on the previous values that you hold to and emphasise them? If you've got your own clear set of values then you have a yardstick by which to judge any new proposals. 

To me this is what is going wrong because in the schools and universities the new values are being proselytised, but there isn't any presentation of the deeper and longer-lasting values that the British people hold - these are values built up slowly bottom-up over the centuries from our experience. Our values that blowins won't understand or appreciate or accept and will instead try to overthrow in order to pull the quilt over their side of the bed.

So without going into a long exploration of traditional British values, we do need to be clear and certain of just what are our beliefs and our values, we need to renew our understanding and faith in:

Economic liberalism
A belief in free market capitalism where government intervention in economic affairs is minimised. Small govt.

Individual responsibility
ie that individuals are accountable for their own actions and welfare. Work not welfare. Self-sufficiency.

Law and order
means the management and enforcement of laws to ensure public safety and societal stability. Eg the boatloads of illegals is so flagrant and destructive of our infrastructure and stability.

National sovereignty
means the authority of a state to govern itself without external interference from eg the EU, also much more critical of the US and NATO.

Traditional values
And lastly, traditional values tell us what historically has got us here and what has worked for us - the importance of heritage, cultural norms, societal structures that define British society historically. We should fight for the family, moral standards, the monarchy even, and so on, stuff that has stood the test of time.

You may not staunchly agree with all of this, hopefully anyway you are open to change, but if you want to change things, you consider that it must be done slowly, bit by bit, and with the consent of the people ... managed competently ...not foisted upon us by outsiders or upstarts in a massive shift that lacks legitimacy and proper change management control.

Most important of all is that we should face reality directly. It is a hard and competitive world and waving a woke agenda all the time is a distraction that is blowing us onto the rocks. Reality is economics (debt, inequality) and war (stop this playground bully and figure out Security Treaties and Arms Limitations) and our national heritage culture (make clear our national character beliefs and values, stop diluting and diversifying) - in that order. Focus on that.
 
LINKS

https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/10/31/why-the-culture-war-matters/

Unherd

New Culture Forum

Wednesday, 17 April 2024

MOTOWN

17 April 2024



"The Tears of a Clown"(Hank Cosby, Stevie Wonder, Smokey Robinson)

Smokey Robinson & The Miracles
Released September 1970

"Writing about a sad subject in a happy context and making it singable."


That is Motown! The Motown sound!!

Motown was a record company founded in 1959 by Berry Gordy in Detroit USA. Detroit is the capital of the American motorcar industry and "Motown" means "motor town". It was an all-black recording company - I'd be guessing if I said mostly the guys working in the factories, so it's mostly their music, at least at the beginning.

Motown was like a factory too, a factory that followed a simple repetitive process for producing music hits ... a music hits factory. Berry Gordy produced many many hit records. 

What was the secret, the secret of the Motown sound? To understand Motown we have to go back to Africa and tribal chanting, we have to go back to the slave trade and working the cotton fields, we have to move on to Christianity and Gospel music, and we have to see how technology was introduced to produce "Rhythm and Blues" (RnB) from Jazz and chant.

Motown is Soul Music made popular. Soul music started off in the 1950s and 60s from Gospel music.

Gospel is from the music sung by black slaves in the cotton fields originally, and in all-black churches. It's a kind of religious chant with African rythms, simple call-and-repeat to engage a congregation of worshippers. The congregation repeats what the vicar said. It is deeply consoling.

Motown is from church Gospel, but also from rhythm and blues. Rhythm and Blues is a black American music from the 40s that mixes Jazz with a kind of rocking beat from the piano. R&B lyrical themes - the ideas being sung about - very often summarise the African-American history and experience of pain from slavery, the denial of freedom and joy, as well as the triumphs and failures in the racism they suffered. It is about oppression, difficult and stressful relationships, hard times materially and financially, and of course their hopes and longings - "I had a dream last night...".

R&B infused into Gospel produced Motown, The Motown Sound. It spoke for the public but also to the public as it was background motivation to people involved in the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.

You gotta understand all that to appreciate the fundamental strains in American society dating all the way back to slavery when 13 million Africans made it alive in the slave boats to work in the plantations of the Deep South, and the Civil War that followed when the North tried to impose its idea of an equitable society, so-called.

What is The Motown Sound? I mean, how can you recognise it?

It's all about making the blend of Gospel and Rhythm and Blues - which are black musics - really appeal to a much broader white audience. In other words, it popularises this core black music with a view to more record sales. That was Berry Gordy, out to make money ... and who can blame him? A very clever and original guy.

Here are the main features of Motown - This is how you can recognise the genre:

- tambourines to accent the back beat

- electric bass-guitar (new at the time) for the main melody

- special chord structures - a chord is a collection of notes belonging together in a "key". A chord structure structure is the progression from one chord to the next. This progression sets the emotional tone of the music from happy to sad.

- a call-and-response singing style from  Gospel music, the church, from the cotton fields, from Africa.

- So, a simple and repeated progression of chords make the structure, but also sophisticated melodies, the tune that you hear, that first pulls you into the song...then there is the story being told, the lyrics.

- A four-beat drum pattern, nothing simpler - it is the toe-tapping rhythm of the music where certain notes in a chord get emphasised over others.

- Rich horns and strings, the famous "wall of sound" that gives a lush "whoooosh" organ-like reverberating feeling as the sound progresses (This is record-producer Phil Spector's Wall of Sound, which was parallel to Tamla with a lot of cross influence between the two.)

- A trebly style ("treble" is higher notes, "bass" is lower deeper notes). This means mixing sounds electronically (new) in the studio (again, the Wall of Sound) to boost or rebalance the lighter more romantic, girl and boy holding hands, treble.

- A sound with special appeal to a motoring (this is Motown!) public (new) who listened on AM radio (AM is an early technical broadcast method to send sound to your radio).

- Pop (for "popular", ie big audiences) used techniques like sweet orchestral string sections trilling on your hear strings, power-blasting horn sections, carefully arranged background vocals. But nothing hard for ordinary folk to follow - no complicated arrangements, no elaborate, melismatic gliding vocal riffs (one vowel across many notes), and simple story lines rhat put words to our feelings. Motown was simple to follow and simple to understand, undemanding yet a really rich chocolately sound to bathe in - that is why we all love it!

Monday, 15 April 2024

RECRUITMENT RHETORIC

15 April 2024

                     the glory, the fight

REFERENCED

https://www.polskieradio.pl/395/9766/Artykul/3364794,more-than-half-of-french-youth-ready-to-enlist-and-fight-in-ukraine

https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/regain-de-patriotisme-57-des-jeunes-francais-interroges-prets-a-senroler-sous-les-drapeaux-en-cas-de-guerre-12-04-2024-35ZK3VMTFFBJPKSWOQ433R675Y.php

"The glory, the fighting"

Article from Le Parisien. The French MSM is doing a great job painting Russia as evil and manipulating French youth into signing up.

REVIEW

"Without mentioning a particular country, 57% of the young people questioned said they were ready to enlist  “in the event of war”.", it says.

Yeah it looks like the Army is softening up the public for a good recruitment campaign, doesn't it.

For a start, the survey is one of many, probably the one that produces the most extreme result - which is a 50/50 split in the 18-23 age group. 

This particular survey was carried out between June 16 and July 9 2023, so well before Macron declared on February 26 that he would not exclude sending ground troops to Ukraine.  Also at a timewhen Russia was weak, long before the failure of  Ukraine's counter-offensive.

Furthermore, to the question: “if the protection of France required the country to engage in the war in Ukraine, would you be ready to commit to defend your country?”», the 57% drops to 51% of those answering “yes” if Ukraine specifically is mentioned, ie fighting Russia, but only 17% actually answering +vely “yes absolutely”, with 34% “yes perhaps” - so not 57%, not 51%, but 17% ... and that when the Western public still had little doubt it was winning ... French youth are people of good sense and I very much doubt you would get 17% today, when Russia is dropping TOS fire bombs all along the front line and blowing Ukraine's youth to smithereens.

No need to go into the detail here of how the questions were worded so as to lead one-way to the desired answer !!!

This is more about the attraction of a career in the military, the Foreign Legion indeed, da-daah, (subsequent to the survey, kicked out of West Africa btw), especially attractive when unemployment in France is two or three times what it is in the UK.

To be perhaps a bit picky, it's worth pointing out that the survey was conducted in June and July and it is Bastille Day on the 14th of July. Also at that time there was a lot of heated debate around the reform of pensions, creating a polarised climate in which I'd guess young people are feeling more patriotic given that they have the most to gain from such a reform. And given that France has been slipping in its global position, probably young people were feeling their personal and national security was at issue, under threat.

What's most interesting about this article is the rhetoric used to soften up the public and prepare them for war. The main lever used to motivate soldiers is fear and this article builds fear in young people, encouraging them to fight when they feel they, their family and their country are under threat, boys and young men have no experience of war and do not understand the consequences for them and their family.

Saturday, 13 April 2024

UKRAINE RUNS ENTIRELY ON FOREIGN AID

13 April 2024

It's quite possible that the economy grows at 5% because after all "the economy" is its GDP, is simply a measure of the amount of money that changes hands. But what if the money that's being exchanged for goods and services comes from outside the economy? What are the consequences for the people and the economy?

The people produce nothing and are unable to produce anything, because they have no infrastructure. The money they're spending is not their own, meaning they are entirely under the control of the donors and this makes them vulnerable to any outside events.

Growth comes from producing new products and services and puuting in place new infrastructure and so on. The Ukrainian people will be incapable of that, so no research, no technological innovation, no new infrastructure and no new goods and services.

It's a completely false and precarious situation ... what happens if the money flow stops ? There's no buffer to changes imposed from outside, no protection, just reeling from one shock to the next ... sounds like what is happening at this moment.

What about the social fabric of such a society? There will be high unemployment, social unrest, loss of national sovereignty, political challenges without the resources to implement change. Dependence on funds from the US and EU means more corruption and inefficiency within the economy and in the US economy too.... this walk in the park is not one-way.

And thinking about it from simple economics of supply and demand, as the money supply increases but the supply of goods and services does not, prices are going to rise, leading to inflation and hyperinflation.

They may as well abandon their currency as they are going to be a totally dollar oriented economy.

So all it has to look forward to is a total dependence on the dollar, no independent policy made by the people's own representatives according to Ukraine's own national interest, increasing poverty, higher and higher inflation, more unemployment ... what will that do to the people? To anyone who's left rhat is, who hasn't fled? 

Slav means slave, right. Just a cesspool gushing worthless dollars and a worthless people, a sentinel slave estate.

A perfect basket case fit for the IMF, you might impulsively conclude. A perfect New Rwanda.

But it's not going to be that way as Ukraine will not fall into the hands of America, nor the economy into the hands of the dollar. It will be renewed, just like Novo Rossiya was renewed, created even, by Catherine the Great, and whoever's left, and those willing to return home, will want that and will want to participate in The Great Rebuild, Novo Rossiya 2.0.


The rebuilding of Ukraine as 'Novo Rossiya 2.0', envisioned as an independent, neutral and revitalised nation and economy, free from foreign dominance, a constituent state of the Russian Federation (the west end of former Ukraine has reverted to a landlocked remnant, needing a new regime and a revised Constitution recognising amongst many things, Russia's insistence on neutrality)
.