Sunday, 7 July 2024

ELECTIONS IN FRANCE AND BRITAIN

7 July 2024

French elections - 2nd round today


The centre left is sucessful in the major conurbations, Ensemble has the managerial and technical class, the RN is doing well in the provinces.

The French voting system is two rounds. In the first round any one with over 50% wins outright - RN got 70 sears - and those where there's no overall winner go through to a runoff.

In the runoff, only candidates with more than 12.5% were allowed through from the first and then it is simple majority.

What's happening is that the centre and left are combining to exclude the right, the RN. 

The weaker of the centre left candidates will drop out with the expectation that the votes of the left a d centre will combine and defeat the RN. 

It worked, RN finished with only 142 seats, in third place. It would have won more seats had it not been for the gaming of the electoral system – mostly for purposes of political self-interest, though dressed up with much moral humbug.

The other parties are cooperating to exclude the RN, this is why, despite being the most popular party, the RN is unlikely to win an overall majority and they have said that they will not form a government of coalition (no one will work with them).

So it really looks like there could be a lot of chaos and confusion for years to come, but also it looks like the stock markets might muddle through.

British election results


Starmer's thumping great majority might look odd, Europe is going right and the UK left, but in reality it is voters everywhere voting against the incumbent.

What have we landed ourselves with in the UK? Prime Minister Starmer has a program that does not seem to respond to popular needs - debt, housing, NHS, war, immigration, stagnation, the financial insecurity of the people, and the insecurity that comes from open borders - and he doesn't really have the tax resource to do anything new.

So it's a government that will administer rather than govern as Mercouris put it (Mercouris is thinking of the closing years of the Habsburg Empire, but you could equally well think that Britain is bankrupt of ideas and resources, and is "in administration" to the American Order). 

Meaning we'll have the same problems in five years time as we have today, national and local problems that a government looking towards its peers in the Western global elite does not really recognise or understand. What do the people care about a globalist or Western agenda that seems dominated by America's corporate needs and those of a tiny Global majority of ultra rich, by war on imaginary enemies killing hundreds of thousands of ordinary people in poorer countries and wrecking their economies, by attempts to control climate change with costly unproven NetZero policies, by a Woke social agenda of trivia at home, by open borders that destroy national identity and infrastructure and social harmony. 

Preserving the status quo seems to be the priority for Western elites, when all the signs of inequality and waste and decline are making the people madder and madder.

These governments shows little interest in repaying national debt, important now that interest rates have returned to a normal 5%; nor in industrial  policies that would restore productivity and competitivity and level up the balance of payments, ultimate source of national wealth, nor in social justice, nor in maintaining national sovereignty.

Saturday, 6 July 2024

SAME CIRCUS DIFFERENT CLOWN

6 July 2024

A case for PR.

the disconnect between politicians and the public due to the first-past-the-post election system

Why Labour’s strength in the Commons is heavily exaggerated.

https://is.gd/Mg8zvs

1. Labour's Victory and the Electoral System

- Labour's win is exaggerated due to the electoral system.
- Voters rejected the Conservatives but didn't fully embrace Labour.

2. Conservative Party's Decline

- Conservative support dropped to 24%, the lowest ever.
- The party now has only 121 MPs, a historic low.
- Support fell most in their defended seats.
- Reform UK's 15% vote share weakened Conservative strongholds.

3. Impact of Reform UK

- Reform UK gained 15% of the vote, winning five seats.
- The rise in Reform support, especially in Conservative-held seats, significantly hurt the Tories.
- Nigel Farage's campaign efforts eroded Conservative support further.

4. Tactical Voting

- Voters chose Labour or Liberal Democrats strategically to defeat Conservatives.
- Labour support rose by six points in Conservative-contested seats.
- Liberal Democrats saw a nine-point rise where they were the main challengers.

5. Labour's Vote Share

- Labour won 35% of the vote, less than previous leaders Corbyn and Blair.
- This is the lowest vote share for a majority government in history.

6. Voter Turnout

- Turnout dropped by eight points to 60%, the second-lowest since 1885.
- Sharpest drop in seats where Labour polled well in 2019.

7. Disproportional Outcome

- The election result highlights the discrepancy between vote share and seats won.
- Labour's exaggerated strength in Commons may spur debate on electoral reform.

8. Challenges for Labour

- Labour's stance on Gaza and its tenure in Wales cost support, especially in Muslim-majority areas.
- To maintain power, Starmer needs to prove his party's capability to handle their new responsibilities.

9. Comparison of Parties

- Reform had a 14% vote share but only won five seats.
- Liberal Democrats, with a 12% vote share, secured 71 seats.
- This discrepancy underscores the dis proportionality of the electoral system.

10. First Hundred Days

- Initial outrage at Parliament not representing the people. 
- Large proportion of people whose votes were wasted due to FTPT.
- Then realisation that the same problems that the Tories had failed to fix, still confront the new Labour government, with the same financial and pluralist constraints
- Impression of a bankrupt country, in administration.

AND EUROPE WILL RISE AGAIN

6 July 2024

The answer to how to find global peace is in the attitude that needs to replace "hostility": it is "respect". 

What is respect? Respect means listening, understanding and taking account of the interests of the other. That's it. Doesn't mean weakness or unmatched concessions - don't talk about Chamberlain please, or accuse diplomats of being "putinistas".

Isn't this what intelligence means: "To understand"? How much do our leaders understand of the position of the other parties in these conflicts? How can they understand anything if they don't engage in dialogue?

The method to "take account of" rhe interests of the other is called negotiation, dialogue, mediation, diplomacy ... a logical approach to change management or conflict resolution ... call it what you will, this rational approach to decision-making, with respect for the interests of the other side and within the framework of international law, could stabilise the West and even reverse the decline.

Europe is tremendously well placed here to act as an intermediary between America and Russia, and America and China, and indeed sitting on the east-west Mackinder geopolitical fault line, is very well placed to cooperate on a Eurasian security architecture.

A Eurasian security architecture could render NATO, if not caduc or obsolete, then at least would provide the security from each other that each country in Europe needs, given Europe's history of relentless warring, so that makes sense. ....makes sense as using logic and reason, in place of emotions and hostility, and plain fear and greed.

And look how easy it would be for Europe to take a global lead, after negotiations with the enemies of the West, once it had the ability, a free hand, to exploit its technology, its joint natural resources, its population size and its wealth - all of which exceed America's.

In summary, respect and negotiation with a view to independence for Europe and Asia from the Americans - as they obtained from Britain 248 years ago! - let the Americans go, let them be king in their own continent.

The Western leaderships do not appear ro like the Russians and they don't like the Arabs and they take hostile military action against them. The Russians and the Arabs know this, they know the West and they don't trust. To have a chance of winning, the West needs to know its own rationale and the rationale of the other. Reason, logic and the truth must prevail over instinct and ignorance and prejudice.


AND EUROPE WILL RISE AGAIN