Monday, 13 October 2025
1. GOLD, EQUITIES AND THE ENDGAME OF A TRASHED CURRENCY
2. THREE GOLD ETFs WORTH CONSIDERING
1. Reflections on portfolio construction
2. Trader’s Take section in gold ETFs
1. Balancing Gold with the Real Economy
A sound portfolio doesn’t live on bullion alone. Gold provides the bedrock - protection against monetary folly and market tremors - but lasting wealth also needs exposure to the productive world. Alongside a core weighted towards gold and miners, investors should hold select equities in energy and industrials, the two sectors most closely tied to tangible output and inflation dynamics. This combination anchors the portfolio in real assets while still capturing the pulse of economic growth.
2. ETFs Worth Considering
SGLN – iShares Physical Gold ETC
TER 0.12 % | AUM ≈ £13 billion
SGLN is the simplest sterling-denominated route to hold physical gold. Each share is backed by allocated bullion (?) stored in London vaults, tracking the spot price almost perfectly and remaining unhedged to the US dollar. It’s a low-cost, transparent way to preserve purchasing power or hedge against monetary excess.
AUCP – Legal & General Gold Mining UCITS ETF
TER 0.65 % | AUM ≈ $400 million
AUCP tracks the FTSE Gold Mines Index, providing exposure to leading global gold-mining companies such as Newmont, Barrick and Agnico Eagle. It sits between pure bullion and high-risk junior miners, offering leverage to gold prices without extreme volatility. In strong bull phases, AUCP tends to outperform the metal; in corrections, it retreats faster. Its higher TER reflects the costs of maintaining sector purity and global weighting.
GDXJ – VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF
TER 0.55 % | AUM ≈ $4 billion
GDXJ invests in smaller, fast-growing exploration and development miners. It brings higher potential returns - and greater volatility - than large-cap funds like AUCP. When gold rallies, juniors can surge; when sentiment turns, they can fall hard. Best suited to investors who understand the cycle and can ride the swings of this high-beta segment.
Trader’s Take: How to blend the three in one gold strategy
Together, these three funds offer a complete exposure to gold’s ecosystem: SGLN anchors the portfolio in physical metal, the ultimate store of value; AUCP adds torque through major miners leveraged to gold prices; and GDXJ supplies the speculative edge via junior explorers with outsized upside in a bull cycle. In a stagflationary world where real assets regain power over paper promises, a balanced mix of roughly 50% SGLN, 30% AUCP and 20% GDXJ offers both defence and opportunity - the timeless metal, the producers, and the dreamers who dig it out of the ground.
Saturday, 11 October 2025
DO WE WANT OR NEED A DIGITAL ID CARD
Monday, 6 October 2025
KEY DATES RECAP OF UKRAINE PROXY WAR
KEY DATES IN EURASIAN HISTORY AND GEOPOLITICS
- 434 – 453 Attila the Hun – Huns raid Europe; Rome weakened.
- 882 – 1240 Kievan Rus’ – Prince Oleg unites Slavic tribes under Viking rule.
- 988 Conversion to Christianity – aligns Kievan Rus’ with Byzantium.
- 1054 The Great Schism – split between Catholic Rome and Orthodox Constantinople.
- 1206 – 1227 Genghis Khan – creates the Mongol Empire, opens Silk Road.
- 1240 Mongol invasion – Kievan Rus’ collapses; birth of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus.
- 1853 – 1856 First Crimean War – Britain defends route to India.
- 1904 & 1920 Halford Mackinder – formulates Heartland Theory of geopolitics.
- 1917 Communist Revolution – birth of the Soviet Union.
- 1945 – 1989/91 WWII and Cold War – Soviet control of Central Europe.
- 1994 Clinton – NATO expansion announced (Brussels & Prague).
- 2004 Orange Revolution – Yanukovych ousted; pro-West turn.
- 2007 Putin’s Munich Speech – warns NATO expansion a “serious provocation.”
- 2008 Bucharest Summit – Ukraine & Georgia promised NATO membership.
- 2014 Maidan Revolution – Yanukovych deposed; Crimea annexed; Donbas war.
- 2014 & 2015 Minsk Agreements – ceasefires fail to hold.
- 2022 – present Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine.
KEY ECONOMIC REASONS FOR CONTINUING EURASIAN WAR - WHY THE WEST CANNOT PULL OUT
• The West is trapped by its own money, politics, and pride.
• 1990s - 2000s - Western banks and governments pour capital from privatisations into Eastern Europe, expecting profits from cheap labour and resources - especially Ukraine’s wealth.
• 1980s on - productivity and "profit rate" falling for rhe last 40 years at home, creating economic necessity to reduce input costs, improve efficiencies, open new markets
• 1955 on Forever wars fought not to win, but to sustain the system behind it.
- 1950 - 53 - Proof of Concept - Korea
- 1955 - 75 - Pilot: Vietnam
- 9/11 - Bin Laden accuses U.S. of: occupying the Arabian Peninsula ; supporting crusader entity Israel’s oppression of Palestinians ; killing Muslims through sanctions and bombings
- 2001 on - Rollout - Globalisation of the concept : US declares global, borderless War on Terror. Rollout to Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iran, Venezuela? Continuous or "forever wars".
- 2022 - The wars feed a system of digital capitalism, where defence and tech giants develop latest techno profit from dual-use innovations — drones, satellites, AI, and surveillance....meg7.
• 1990s - 2008, 2009 - 2021 The conflict in Ukraine itself has become a revenue stream for the donor class, not a strategic mission in the interests of the American people.
• 2023 - Sanctions backfired, weakening European economies and further driving up debt, energy costs, and public discontent.
• Now - Ending the war would mean admitting policy failure, exposing elite mismanagement and corruption, destruction of careers, legal pursuit and prison
• The result: an unwinnable war that the West cannot afford to end - trapped between hubris and collapse. Russian expansionism or Western post-colonial liberal imperialism?
I would say you can put it down to fear of the Russian bear or you can go on to highlight American global agapani or you can go further and identify the economic reasons behind this war and why the West cannot pull out.
[End]
Friday, 3 October 2025
FULL ENGLISH BREAKFAST
Tuesday, 30 September 2025
UKRAINE - WHY THE WEST CANNOT WALK AWAY
Sunday, 28 September 2025
HISTORY RHYMES - FROM ALEXANDER TO AMERICA
Friday, 26 September 2025
3/3 GLOBALISATION AND RICARDIAN ECONOMICS : THE NEO LIBERAL TRAP
- The Collapse of the American Empire (1/3).
- Singapore: How to Avoid the Same Fate (2/3).
- Globalisation and Neoliberalism: The Ricardian Trap (here and now 3/3).
Globalisation and Neoliberalism: The Ricardian Trap
1. The Promise of Ricardo
The theory of comparative advantage says each country should specialise in what it does best (this is not dissimilar to OTOP : one tambon one product) then trade freely across borders. Everyone doing what their best at was supposed to make everyone richer, creating efficiency, innovation, and cheaper goods for all of us.
2. From Promise to Practice
However, in practice, globalisation and neoliberalism took Ricardo’s idea and ran with them just a bit too far.
- Capital, goods, and people flowed without restraint. Take people. Immigration is a great answer to shortages of labour. Labour shortest years might arrives for demographic reasons or simply because there is a growing demand that the producer can no longer meet. But hey wait a moment, what do the native peoples, the Host population, think of this? What do they think of piling up foreign cultures religions languages ... different cultures ... all into their living space?
- What happens if manufacturing jobs are shut down in a rich country because it's cheaper to ship the work abroad to low cost labor countries what happens to the work traditionally done by local people?
- And what happens to the wages of local people if they're now in competition with migrants? Wages stagnate
- Look at capital flows the work has gone abroad and with it the prophets but the reserve currency is a reserve currency used for international trade where will a foreign company or government store it's wealth maybe not in its local currency which is depreciating against the dollar they will want to store it in us treasuries that added demand is going to raise the price on us treasuries and asset values generally. So foreign demand for treasuries, corporate bonds, equities, real estate... raises asset prices eg the cost of a home goes up beyond a a price local people can afford. Those lucky enough to already own assets see those values go up while those without have only debt increasing debt.
- Deficits widen, debt balloons, and societies became more unequal - it was so easy to borrow or print so much easier than raising taxes.
The winners were global corporations, financiers, and the very small proportion of the population who seriously owned assets. The losers were the workers in industrial economies who saw their purchasing power drop decade after decade.
3. The American Collapse
The US embraced this model most fully. You can see how it shifted from production to consumption, and from industry to finance - I would call this papering over the debts Twin deficits (trade and budget) became structural, debt piled up, and the reserve currency status only encouraged fiscal and monitoring irresponsibility. What began as Ricardo’s elegant logic ended in de-industrialisation and imperial overreach.
4. Singapore’s Escape Route
Singapore is at an early stage of the debt cycle. It could follow the US path — financialisation, overvaluation, complacency, hubris — or it could chart a smarter course.
- Protect industrial capacity.
- Invest in productivity and innovation.
- Resist easy debt and speculative bubbles.
- Stay neutral in geopolitics.
Conclusion
Globalisation promised prosperity through Ricardo’s "comparative advantage". Neoliberalism turned that promise into a trap. America fell into it. Britain before it too. Singapore now faces the same choice: repeat the cycle, or stay small, stay smart, stay productive.
2/3 CAN SINGAPORE AVOID THE RESERVE CURRENCY CURSE
Wednesday, 24 September 2025
PALESTINE - A GOVERNMENT IN EXILE IN ITS OWN COUNTRY
Short polemical post on an absurd injustice created by colonial hypocrisy where land was promised by people who didn't own it and given or rather taken by another who weren't living rhere, without any regard for the native people who actually inhabited the region.
A Government in Exile in Its Own Country
Recognition of Palestine by Britain, France and others has created one of the strangest paradoxes in modern politics. The Palestinian Authority in Ramallah is now the recognised government of Palestine. But in reality, Hamas controls Gaza, running the streets, the police, and the ministries with near 100% support from the citizens of this newly-created state.
Normally, a government-in-exile rules from abroad: the Free French in London, the Poles during the war, Tibet in India, the Kuomintang (Republic of China) in Formosa.
But here is something new. Hamas is not abroad. It is on its own land and it holds territory, it commands loyalty and it exercises power, but it has no legitimacy in the eyes of the international system and is condemned as a terrorist state.
And while the West recognises Palestine (rather late in the day) yet it still continues to supply arms to Palestine's adversary, bent on its destruction. That's rather more than irony, that is a cruel and murderous hypocrisy.
Meanwhile, the PA has the opposite problem: it enjoys recognition, has seats at the UN, and gets assistance from European chancelleries, but has little control or legitimacy on the ground.
This must be a first in world history:
- a government-in-exile that never left home
- a state that gets recognition from the West who nonetheless is focused on its destruction.
Which of the following best sum up the situation?:
• “A land without a people for a people without a land".
• "A land promised by those who did not own it, to those who did not live in it, taken from those who inhabited it".
• Palestine today is ruled by a government with territory but no recognition, and another with recognition but no territory.
• With one hand they recognise Palestine and with the other they destroy it.
• A government in exile in its own country.
[End]








