THE OPPORTUNITY COSTS OF ASYLUM ACCOMMODATION SPENDING IN THE UK

9 May 2025

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/07/true-cost-of-asylum-hotels-migration-channel-labour/ 

A government minister thwarted by the obligation to house asylum seekers and migrants, arising from domestic UK law, international treaties, and human rights frameworks. "More fool us" is the public response - and they vote in "populist" candidates in consequence, radicalising the politics of the country in ways this Minister does not appreciate and complains about. This major government program is undertaken without parliamentary approval of even scrutiny - and when the Supreme Court gets a hold of this subject, could it lead to civil war... causa belli civilis?

---

The Opportunity Costs of Asylum Accommodation Spending

As the government continues to spend over £5.5 million per day housing asylum seekers in UK hotels, it’s time to look beyond the headline figures and ask: what else could that money have done?

There are direct opportunity costs - what public services and investments were assigned lower priority below asylum seeker support - and also indirect opportunity costs, like distortions in the hotel market caused by block-booking rooms for migrant accommodation.

This isn’t about blaming the individuals seeking refuge. It’s about questioning the efficiency, fairness, and long-term consequences of the current policy. Ultimately, only a Publilc Inquiry will establish truth and permit justice and fairness.

---

1. Direct Opportunity Costs

Healthcare
Funds allocated to asylum accommodation could have gone to the NHS, reducing waiting times, improving patient care, and easing the burden on overworked staff.

Education
Resources could have supported schools: hiring more teachers, reducing class sizes, and fixing buildings in disrepair.

Universal Credit
With £5 billion in benefit cuts on the table, that same money allocated to asylum seekers, could support vulnerable British families instead.

Pensioners
Winter Fuel Allowance cuts could have been avoided, ensuring older citizens don’t have to choose between heating and eating.

Affordable Housing
Investment in social housing would help ease the housing crisis, giving more families a secure roof over their heads, especially the local homeless with residency qualifications of, say, five years or more.

Local Infrastructure
From potholes to public transport, basic services in many communities are underfunded while hotel bills rack up.

Job Creation & Small Businesses
That £15 billion over 10 years could have seeded local job schemes or supported SMEs to grow and hire.

---

2. Indirect Opportunity Costs

Hotel Rack Rates
The government’s large-scale block booking of hotel rooms has tightened supply, especially in budget and mid-range segments. With supply constrained and little incentive for the private sector to invest in building a temporary stock, prices for ordinary travellers have risen. Ordinary travellers means tourists, business and personal.

Availability Pressure
UK residents, including families booking domestic holidays or workers needing temporary stays, now face reduced availability and higher prices - this is another hidden cost.

Distorted Market Signals
Hotel owners may be adapting to government contracts instead of market demand, potentially warping local tourism and hospitality development over the longer term.

---

Conclusion

When we talk about the cost of asylum accommodation, it’s not just a figure in a Treasury spreadsheet. It’s classrooms unfunded, nurses un-hired, pensioners unprotected - and yes, a rising cost to everyone who needs a hotel room.

This appears to be another amoral policy of dither and can-kicking, it is not only unsustainable, but makes no sense economically. We need a better way, one that respects justice and fairness, delivers value for money, honours our obligations, and doesn’t punish the people who are in reality footing the bill.

A Public Inquiry is needed.

---

3. Why the UK’s Asylum Hotel Policy Deserves a Public Inquiry

The UK is currently spending £5.5 million per day housing asylum seekers in hotels. Over a decade, this may cost £15 billion — and yet, there’s been no public inquiry into how this policy was designed, whether it is efficient, and what its long-term consequences might be.

Here’s why that needs to change.

 

---

3a. The Sheer Scale of Spending

This is one of the largest unplanned public expenditure programs in peacetime Britain, and more than many entire government departments. Yet it’s been rolled out with minimal scrutiny.

A public inquiry is needed to examine whether this spending represents value for money, or whether it's a case of policy panic and fire-fighting without a plan.

---

3b. Secrecy Around Contracts

Government deals with hotel chains and outsourcing giants are opaque. Rates paid per room, contract durations, and performance clauses are not disclosed.

There are increasing concerns about cronyism, sweetheart deals, and a lack of competitive bidding. A public inquiry will bring transparency to exactly where public money is going and why.

---

3c. Hidden Economic Side Effects

The government’s bulk hotel bookings have had knock-on effects on the rest of the economy:

• Hotel rack rates have risen

• Supply of affordable short-term accommodation has tightened

• The tourism, business travel and personal events sectors are being distorted.

These indirect opportunity costs are rarely mentioned, yet they affect the public just as much. A public inquiry will explore this neglected dimension.

---

3d. No Local Consultation

Local authorities and communities are often excluded from decision-making. Hotels are block-booked in towns with no input from councillors or residents.

This has led to resentment, public protests, accusations of non-accountability, and a inevitably cynicism, breakdown in trust and a widening gulf between electors and the elected. A public inquiry will assess how the policy affects local social cohesion and citizens' well-being, and how it is that decisions could be made without democratic oversight.

---

3e. Signs of Mismanagement

Reports from the National Audit Office, whistleblowers, and the press describe:

• No long-term housing plan

• Ballooning costs and profiteering

• Poor or unsafe conditions for asylum seekers

• Lack of progress on case processing.

A public inquiry is the only forum with the scope and independence to determine whether this is mismanagement or simply fatal inevitable consequence.

---

3f. There Is Precedent

Public inquiries have been launched into:

• Grenfell Tower (a housing safety failure)

• The Iraq War (foreign policy decision-making)

• The COVID-19 response (public health planning).

All involved less money, and arguably no greater chaos. The asylum hotel policy clearly meets or exceeds that threshold test.

---

3g. Final Conclusion

When billions are spent behind closed doors, with real knock-on consequences for downgraded public services, housing, and community cohesion, the public has a right to answers.

This isn’t about demonising asylum seekers. It’s about demanding honest governance, value for money, and long-term solutions over short-term dithering, obfuscation, can-kicking and panic.

A public inquiry is not just justified. A public inquiry is overdue.

---