OKINAWA - EMPIRE’S EDGE, JAPAN’S BLIND SPOT
────────────────────────────
1. From Ryukyu Kingdom to Japanese Prefecture
- Ryukyu Kingdom - an independent island monarchy from 1429 to 1879.
- It had its own monarchy, Ryukyuan languages, and sea-trade network linking China, Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia.
- In 1879, Meiji Japan annexed Ryukyu, exiled the king, and renamed it Okinawa Prefecture.
- This was not integration but classic colonisation - a small maritime kingdom absorbed by a modernising empire.
────────────────────────────
2. Strategic Geography - Valuable But Expendable
- Okinawa lies between Japan, Taiwan, China, and the Philippines.
- Militarily it is Japan’s front line in the Western Pacific.
- Economically and politically it is tiny - roughly the size of Devon and less than 1 percent of Japan’s land area.
- This combination makes it ideal, from Tokyo’s viewpoint, as a place to park foreign bases and domestic problems.
─────────────────────────────
3. The Battle of Okinawa - A Sacrificed People
- In 1945, Okinawa became the last major battle of the Pacific War.
- For Japan, the strategy was attrition: make Okinawa so costly that the United States might hesitate to invade the main islands.
- Around 100,000 to 150,000 Okinawan civilians died - roughly one quarter to one third of the population in three months.
- Japanese forces treated Okinawans as expendable:
- Executed those speaking Ryukyuan dialects as suspected spies.
- Forced families into group suicides with grenades rather than surrender.
- Drove civilians from caves to free space for wounded soldiers.
- Okinawans later called themselves as sute-ishi - “discarded stones” sacrificed to protect mainland Japan.
────────────────────────────
4. American Occupation And The Base Archipelago
- After 1945, Okinawa was ruled directly by the United States, separate from Japan.
- Japan regained sovereignty in 1952. Okinawa did not. It sat in a limbo for 27 years as a US military colony with Japanese nationals but no Japanese government.
- Reversion to Japan came only in 1972. Many Okinawans expected the US bases to shrink.
- Instead, a new pattern was fixed:
- Okinawa is less than 1 percent of Japan’s land area.
- Yet it hosts roughly 70 percent of all US military facilities in Japan.
- The island became a dense base archipelago - airfields, ports, training grounds, storage depots.
────────────────────────────
5. Why The Bases Stay - Security, Convenience, And Indifference
- Article 9 of Japan’s constitution renounces war and restricts offensive military capability.
- In practice, Japan relies on the US - Japan alliance for hard security, especially against China and North Korea.
- When Washington wants to move or expand facilities, for example Futenma to Henoko, Tokyo almost always agrees.
- Structural reasons:
- The alliance is central to Japanese defence doctrine.
- No other prefecture wants new bases - national level NIMBY.
- Okinawa has only 4 seats in the 465-seat lower house meaning little electoral leverage.
- Tokyo presents this as the “least bad option” for national security. Okinawa pays the local price for a national calculation.
────────────────────────────
6. Marginalisation Inside A Supposedly Homogeneous Nation
- Officially, Japan describes itself as ethnically uniform: one people, one culture.
- There is no comprehensive anti-discrimination law covering ethnicity or region.
- Ryukyuans are not recognised in law as a distinct indigenous people, despite UN criticism.
- This legal fiction allows the state to say “we are all Japanese, so no special protections are needed” whilst:
- Concentrating bases in one peripheral region.
- Allowing stereotypes of Okinawans as lazy or backward to circulate.
- Overriding local opposition on “national security” grounds whenever necessary.
- It is not overt malice so much as structural indifference backed by centralised power.
────────────────────────────
7. Why There Is No Strong Independence Movement
Compared with Catalonia or the Basque Country, the absence of a strong Okinawan independence movement is striking. Several reasons overlap.
-
Demographic destruction
- A quarter to a third of the population died in 1945.
- Ryukyuan languages are now spoken fluently by very few under 40.
- Language is the core of a durable political identity and Ryukyuan is disappearing.
-
Economic dependency
- Okinawa is Japan’s poorest prefecture.
- Subsidies from Tokyo and money tied to bases and tourism are central to its economy.
- Independence would mean losing those flows without any substitute sources of income.
-
No external sponsor
- Any Chinese support for independence would instantly be seen as a geopolitical move, discrediting the cause.
- Unlike Catalonia in the EU, Okinawa has no friendly regional framework to fall back on.
-
Trauma and realism
- The Battle of Okinawa taught that resistance can equal annihilation.
- Independence would mean: loss of Japanese citizenship, exposure to Chinese pressure, but continued US interest.
- Most Okinawans therefore push for fairer treatment within Japan, not separation from it.
-
Resistance does exist - in anti-base voting, legal challenges, cultural revival - but it is tactical, not secessionist.
────────────────────────────
8. Parallels With Korea - Colonisation And Denial
There are clear echoes of how Japan treated Korea:
- Japan's denial of Okinawan civilian deaths mirrors its comfort women denial:
- Forced annexation of a previously independent kingdom.
- Suppression of language and culture in favour of a standardised “Japanese” identity.
- Economic exploitation and use of the population as expendable in wartime.
- The pattern of denial is similar too - minimising or sanitising war crimes, softening textbook accounts, framing coercion as “voluntary sacrifice”.
- The key difference is power: South Korea became a sovereign state able to demand recognition and reparations.
- Okinawa remains a Japanese prefecture without international voice. Its museums and memorials tell the story, but they rarely reach the mainland - let alone the wider world.
────────────────────────────
9. Culture As Fusion - Champuru Identit
Champuru means “mix” - and Okinawan culture is exactly that.
-
Ryukyuan layer
- Eisa dance, sacred groves (utaki), yuta priestesses, awamori spirit, pork-heavy cuisine.
-
Chinese influence
- Shisa lion-dogs at gates, aspects of court culture, stir-fry techniques, early martial arts roots.
-
Japanese overlay
- Language dominance, schooling, bureaucracy, national media.
-
American occupation legacy
- English loanwords, car culture, base-side entertainment zones, “American Village”, A&W, spam and taco rice.
-
Hawaiian marketing
- A genuine diaspora link to Hawaii overlaps with a conscious branding strategy as “Japan’s Hawaii” for mainland tourists.
-
The result is not a neat multicultural mosaic but a hybrid identity that is both global and distinctly local, yet increasingly packaged for visitor consumption.
────────────────────────────
10. Karate - From Ryukyuan Art To Japanese Brand
- Karate emerged in Ryukyu from local fighting systems combined with Chinese martial arts, particularly after Satsuma’s 1609 invasion and ban on weapons.
- In the 1920s and 1930s, as karate was taken to mainland Japan, it was refashioned:
- Characters changed from “Chinese hand” to “empty hand”.
- Japanese ranking systems and terminology were imposed.
- It was presented as a Japanese martial art from “southern Japan”.
- During the war, karate served nationalist mobilisation. After the war, Japanese organisations controlled its global spread.
- Today, most practitioners worldwide know karate as “Japanese”. Okinawa offers “authentic Okinawan karate” as a niche pilgrimage and tourism product - a low-key form of cultural reclamation after appropriation.
────────────────────────────
11. Tourism, Exoticism, And The Double Game
- For mainland Japan, Okinawa is:
- A tropical playground for domestic tourists.
- An exotic “other” inside the nation with beaches, bright shirts, relaxed vibe.
- For the state, it is also:
- A military buffer against China.
- A convenient dumping ground for US bases that other prefectures will not accept.
- Officially, Okinawans are simply Japanese citizens like any others.
- Practically, they are treated as a peripheral people whose history, trauma, and objections can be overridden in the name of security and national unity.
────────────────────────────
12. What Okinawa Means Today
-
To Tokyo and Washington
- A geostrategic asset anchoring the US - Japan alliance in the Western Pacific.
- A place where the costs of deterrence can be discretely concentrated.
-
To the outside world
- Largely invisible, Okinawa is known, if at all, as “Japan’s islands near Taiwan” or as a generic diving destination.
-
To Okinawans themselves
- The memory of a kingdom annexed and a people sacrificed.
- A present that is shaped by bases, tourism, and suffers from limited autonomy.
- A culture that survives as both "lived identity" and "curated performance".
- A constant sense of being Japanese enough to bear burdens, but not Japanese enough to be fully heard.
Okinawa sits at the intersection of empire, memory, and strategy ... as a place where Japan’s official story of homogeneity and pacifism breaks down, and where the unresolved tensions of the 20C remain very much alive.






0 comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it clean, keep it lean