Tag these articles: SEATMS
WHY MALAYSIA IS HOLDING ITSELF BACK
Malaysia’s growth model once delivered miracles. But the same system that built prosperity now anchors it. The middle-income trap isn’t about innovation alone — it’s about power, incentives, and fear of change.
1. The Middle-Income Trap Explained
Malaysia’s economy grew fast through industrialisation, export zones, and foreign investment. But now, wages are too high to compete with low-cost producers like Vietnam, and productivity too low to rival innovators like South Korea.
Economists call this the middle-income trap — when a nation climbs halfway up the ladder and then stops, unable to shift from imitation to innovation.
2. The Dependence Problem
Malaysia still relies heavily on multinational corporations for high-tech manufacturing. Local firms assemble, but rarely invent.
Tax breaks attract foreign capital, but the profits and patents mostly leave. There’s no self-sustaining innovation ecosystem, just a service chain for global giants.
3. Weak Productivity and R&D Conversion
Yes, Malaysia spends on research and higher education. But what comes out?
Few patents, weak university - industry linkages, and limited venture capital.
The innovation pipeline leaks at every stage - ideas exist, but commercialisation rarely happens. It needs a process:
Ideas
-> university research
-> startups
-> commercialiation
What we call "science and technology".
4. Structural Comfort Zones
The system protects rather than challenges.
Government-linked companies dominate key sectors - oil, gas, plantations, banking - soaking up talent and capital.
These firms operate under political patronage, not market pressure. That means less competition, less innovation, and fewer new entrants.
5. Policy Paradox: Stability vs Dynamism
The ethnic quota system (New Economic Policy, NEP) provided stability, lifting millions of Malays into the middle class. But it also dampened meritocracy and competition.
Entrepreneurial energy moved abroad — to Singapore, Australia, and beyond.
Malaysia preserved peace, but at the cost of dynamism.
6. Talent Drain and Institutional Stagnation
Around two million Malaysians live and work overseas, many in fields Malaysia needs most: engineering, medicine, design, IT.
At home, bureaucracy, corruption, and rigid hierarchies discourage risk-taking. In a fast-moving world, that’s fatal.
As one economist put it: “Malaysia doesn’t lack brains. It lacks an environment that lets brains breathe.”
7. How Malaysia Could Reignite Growth
- Shift focus from ownership to performance: reward results, not race.
- Build true innovation clusters around universities and start-ups.
- Cut red tape that deters small entrepreneurs.
- Modernise education : creativity and problem-solving, not rote learning.
- Reduce dependence on state-linked corporations and open space for competition.
8. Conclusion: The Political Economy of Fear
Malaysia’s problem isn’t ignorance, it’s fear - fear of upsetting the balance that has kept peace for half a century.
But without bold reform, that balance will become stagnation.
Innovation needs friction, diversity, and trust - what's missing is the courage to let ideas win on merit.
Malaysia’s future depends on whether it can turn its pluralism from a handicap into an advantage; and its stability from a comfort zone into a platform for renewal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it clean, keep it lean