Wednesday, 12 November 2025

7. A BRIEF HISTORY OF JAPAN

12 November 2025

A Brief History of Japan

────────────────────────────

CONTENTS

If time is short, start at ct. 5

1. Origins and Early Culture (Prehistory – 710 CE)
2. The Classical Age – Nara and Heian (710 – 1185)
3. The Age of the Samurai (1185 – 1603)
4. The Tokugawa Peace (1603 – 1868)
5. Opening and Modernisation – The Meiji Restoration (1868 – 1912)
6. Empire and War (1912 – 1945)
7. Reconstruction and the Economic Miracle (1945 – 1990)
8. The Modern Era (1990 – Present)

────────────────────────────

1. Origins and Early Culture (Prehistory – 710 CE)

Japan’s story begins in prehistory with the Jōmon people (from around 14,000 BCE) - hunter-gatherers who left intricate pottery and early evidence of settled life.
They were followed by the Yayoi culture (300 BCE - 300 CE), introducing rice farming, metal tools, and social hierarchy from Korea and China.
By the Kofun period (300 - 710 CE), Japan had emerging regional rulers and burial mounds (kofun), the most famous being Emperor Nintoku’s massive tomb in Osaka.

────────────────────────────

2. The Classical Age - Nara and Heian (710 - 1185)

The Nara period (710 - 794) established Japan’s first capital at Nara, modelled on China’s Chang’an.
Buddhism and Confucian administration arrived through Korea and China, blending with native Shinto beliefs.
The Heian period (794 - 1185), centred on Kyoto, saw the flowering of court culture - poetry, calligraphy, and The Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu.
Power shifted from emperors to the noble Fujiwara clan, whose refined aesthetics masked growing provincial unrest.

────────────────────────────

3. The Age of the Samurai (1185 - 1603)

In 1185, Minamoto no Yoritomo founded Japan’s first shogunate in Kamakura, marking the rise of the samurai class.
Feudal lords (daimyō) and their warriors dominated under a code of loyalty and honour known later as bushidō.
The Mongol invasions (1274 and 1281) failed, thanks in part to typhoons later called kamikaze (“divine winds”).
Civil wars followed - the Ashikaga shogunate in Muromachi (1336 - 1573) was weak, and by the 1500s Japan fragmented into rival warlord domains.
This chaotic Sengoku period produced legendary unifiers: Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, and Tokugawa Ieyasu.

────────────────────────────

4. The Tokugawa Peace (1603 - 1868)

Tokugawa Ieyasu seized power in 1603, establishing the Edo Shogunate, headquartered in today’s Tokyo.
For over 250 years, Japan experienced stability and isolation (sakoku). Foreign trade was limited to a few Dutch and Chinese merchants in Nagasaki.
The rigid social hierarchy kept samurai, peasants, artisans, and merchants in fixed stations.
Culture thrived - ukiyo-e woodblock prints, haiku poetry, Kabuki theatre, and Edo urban life flourished.
Yet isolation bred stagnation, and by the 1850s Japan faced the West’s industrial power.

────────────────────────────

5. Opening and Modernisation - The Meiji Restoration (1868 - 1912)

In 1853, Commodore Perry’s “Black Ships” forced Japan to open to foreign trade.
This humiliation spurred internal revolution. The Meiji Restoration of 1868 restored the emperor to power and launched rapid modernisation.
Feudal domains were abolished, the samurai class dismantled, and Western technology, industry, and education embraced.
Japan’s military and economy transformed in a single generation - a feat unmatched in Asia.

────────────────────────────

6. Empire and War (1912 - 1945)

The early 20th century saw Japan rise as an imperial power.
Victories over China (1895) and Russia (1905) made it Asia’s dominant force.
By the 1930s, militarism overtook democracy. Japan invaded Manchuria (1931), China (1937), and the Pacific (1941).
The attack on Pearl Harbor triggered war with the United States.
Defeat in 1945, after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ended the empire and shattered national pride.

────────────────────────────

7. Reconstruction and the Economic Miracle (1945 - 1990)

Under U.S. occupation (1945–52), Japan adopted a new constitution renouncing war.
The post-war decades saw astonishing recovery - the Japanese Economic Miracle.
Exports of electronics, cars, and precision machinery turned Japan into the world’s second-largest economy by the 1980s.
Cultural exports followed - Sony, Toyota, Nintendo, anime, and Zen aesthetics shaped global modernity.

────────────────────────────

8. The Modern Era (1990 - Present)

The 1990s asset bubble collapse ended Japan’s long boom, ushering in the “lost decades.”
Population ageing, deflation, and low growth persist, yet Japan remains technologically advanced and socially stable.
Politically cautious, environmentally mindful, and culturally confident, modern Japan balances innovation with tradition - a nation where robots serve tea in temples and cherry blossoms still mark the seasons.

────────────────────────────

Summary line

Japan’s journey spans isolation and innovation, feudalism and futurism - a civilisation that re-invented itself repeatedly without losing its soul.

─────────────────────────────

Tuesday, 11 November 2025

6. THE JAPANESE ZEN ART OF SIMPLE LIVING

11 November 2025

SHUNMYŌ MASUNO
THE ART OF SIMPLE LIVING

Shunmyō Masuno is a Zen Buddhist priest and internationally acclaimed garden designer. In The Art of Simple Living, he distills Zen philosophy into 100 brief, actionable lessons - transforming ancient wisdom into a practical guide for finding peace in everyday life.

WHO THIS BOOK IS FOR

 Those drowning in busyness seeking gentle reorientation
• Readers intimidated by dense philosophy (this is Zen made practical)
• Anyone drawn to Japanese aesthetics, minimalism, or mindfulness
• People wanting daily inspiration without dogma.

1. Structure of the Book

The book contains 100 short lessons, each just a page or two.

These are grouped into four main parts, reflecting a gradual path from external simplicity to inner calmall with four parts covering order, mindfulness, gratitude, and compassion. The visual flow runs from outer simplicity to inner peace, in the same calm, neutral aesthetic as before:

  1. Part One  clears physical space
  2. Part Two  uses that clarity to calm the mind 
  3. Part Three  transforms awareness into joy 
  4. Part Four  deepens practice into purposeful living.

How to use this book 

Each part blends Zen wisdom with everyday actions - cleaning, arranging, breathing, walking... - showing how tranquillity comes through ordinary practice.

Each lesson stands alone - read one daily as morning reflection, or browse intuitively. Masuno invites practice, not memorisation. Revisit lessons as they resonate with your current season of life.


2. Part One – Simplify Your Life

Focus on tidying and de-cluttering both physically and mentally.
Masuno advises doing one thing at a time, keeping only what serves a purpose, and creating ma - open space.

Central Concept: Ma (間)

Ma is the Japanese principle of "space between" - empty corners, pauses between breaths, silence between words. Masuno teaches that peace lives not in things, but in the spaces we create around them.

Key lessons:

  • “Start your day by making your bed” - not for perfection, not for Jordan Peterson, but as a ritual of readiness.
  • “Empty your mind as you would tidy a drawer.”
  • “Leave one corner of your home empty.”

Theme: External order as the foundation for inner calm.


3. Part Two – Clear Your Mind

Learn to notice the present moment and let go of what doesn’t matter.
Techniques include conscious breathing, short pauses, and stepping outside to feel the air.

Key lessons:

  • “Sit quietly and notice the sounds around you.”
  • “Stop comparing yourself with others.”
  • “Accept that some things are beyond your control.”

Theme: Peace grows not from control but from awareness.


4. Part Three – Find Joy in the Everyday

Cultivate gratitude and playfulness in small acts.
Examples include cleaning as meditation, savouring tea, arranging flowers, and observing the seasons.

Key lessons:

  • “Find one beautiful thing each day.”
  • “Do something kind without expecting thanks.”
  • “Smile at the sky” - a practice of gratitude that costs nothing.

Theme: Mindfulness turns routine into quiet celebration.


5. Part Four – Live Meaningfully and Mindfully

A gentle guide to living with intention and connection.
Emphasis on humility, patience, and compassion - the Zen way of finding meaning through presence, not ambition.

Key lessons:

  • “Learn to rest in uncertainty.”
  • “Treat each task as sacred.”
  • “End your day by expressing gratitude.”

Theme: Simplicity as a spiritual discipline.


6. Overall Message

Masuno’s book is not theory but practice.
It teaches that serenity arises from structure, rhythm, and respect for the spaces between things - a lived form of ma.
By making small, conscious adjustments each day, we cultivate stillness without retreating from ordinary life.


7. Summary Table – The Flow from Outer Order to Inner Peace

Part Focus / Theme Examples of Daily Practices Emotional Effect
1. Simplify Your Life Create space and clarity by removing clutter. Make your bed each morning • Keep only what you use • Leave one corner empty • Do one task at a time. Calm, order, lightness.
2. Clear Your Mind Let go of unnecessary thoughts and comparisons. Sit quietly and listen • Breathe deeply before decisions • Stop competing • Step outside and feel the air. Stillness, acceptance, focus.
3. Find Joy in the Everyday Discover beauty and gratitude in ordinary acts. Arrange a flower • Clean as meditation • Notice one beautiful thing daily • Smile at the sky. Contentment, delight, gratitude.
4. Live Meaningfully and Mindfully Align actions with compassion and intention. Treat each task as sacred
• Rest in uncertainty • Express thanks before sleep.
Purpose, humility, peace.

8. Final Reflection

Masuno guides the reader from tidying the room to tidying the heart.
Every action - sweeping, breathing, smiling - becomes a doorway to calm.
Simplicity, he reminds us, isn’t absence; it’s the presence of space, rhythm, and care.

1. Simplify your life

2. Clear your mind

3. Find joy in the everyday

4. Live meaningfully and mindfully

Simplicity isn't emptiness - it's the presence of space, rhythm, and care. Care for self, care for partner. Masuno shows that enlightenment doesn't require monasteries or mountains. It begins with a made bed, a single flower, a conscious breath. Start anywhere. Start today.




Saturday, 8 November 2025

5. WESTERN AND EAST ASIAN IDEAS ON HERITAGE CONSERVATION

8 November 2025

Based on experience at Gyeongju and previous visits in Seoul illustrating "historic" buildings.


Contents

1. A Fundamental Divide in Heritage Conservation
2. Western vs East Asian Conservation Philosophy
3. Why This Difference?
3.1 Material reality
3.2 Buddhist / Confucian concepts
3.3 Colonial trauma
3.4 Shinto concept (Japan, influencing Korea)

4. Examples of Korean Practice
5. The Uncomfortable Truth
6. Where It Gets Problematic
7. Does It Matter?
8. A Clash of Philosophies
9. What Remains Authentic in Gyeongju
10. The Eunpyeong Problem
11. Authentic vs Fake 'Traditional' in Korea
12. The Scale Problem
13. Why This Happens
13.1 Tourism industrialisation
13.2 Real-estate capitalism
13.3 Loss of spatial literacy
13.4 National pride optics

14. Gyeongju’s Specific Failure
15. The Hidden Hierarchy of Conservation
16. Why Scale Matters
17. Composite Materials - The Cheap Shortcut
18. Where Authenticity Survives
19. Gyeongju and Nara Compared
20. The Broader Contradiction
21. Conclusion

─────────────────────────────

1. A Fundamental Divide in Heritage Conservation

A fundamental philosophical divide runs through heritage conservation - and Korea, like much of East Asia, operates on principles quite distinct from the West.

─────────────────────────────

2. Western vs East Asian Conservation Philosophy

Western (UNESCO / ICOMOS standard):
• Original fabric = sacred
• Patina, weathering, scars = authenticity
• ‘Preserve as found’ - minimal intervention
• Replicas = fake, dishonest, theme park
• Value = age + continuity of material

Korean / Japanese / Chinese approach:
• Form + technique + ritual = authenticity
• Material = temporary vessel
• Periodic rebuilding = renewal, not replacement
• What matters: continuous practice of craft, not the wood or stone itself

─────────────────────────────

3. Why This Difference?

3.1 Material reality
• Korea’s wooden temples in humid monsoon climates decay every 50 - 100 years regardless.
• Europe’s stone cathedrals can last a millennium with minimal intervention.
• Pragmatism forced different philosophies.

3.2 Buddhist / Confucian concepts
• Impermanence is accepted - even celebrated.
• The act of rebuilding is itself a living tradition.
• A temple rebuilt fifty times can be more ‘authentic’ than one preserved but spiritually dead.

3.3 Colonial trauma
• Japan’s 1910 - 45 occupation destroyed and looted Korea’s heritage.
• Post-war reconstruction became defiance: “We will rebuild what was taken.”

3.4 Shinto concept (Japan, influencing Korea)
• Ise Grand Shrine: demolished and rebuilt every 20 years for 1,300 years.
• The act of rebuilding using traditional techniques is the heritage.
• Material continuity is irrelevant.

─────────────────────────────

4. Examples of Korean Practice

Bulguksa Temple, Gyeongju - founded 528 AD, now mostly 1970s concrete reconstruction.
Gyeongbokgung Palace, Seoul — built 1395, 90 % destroyed by 1910, rebuilt 1990s–2010s.
Namdaemun Gate, Seoul - burned 2008, rebuilt 2013 using traditional joinery and hidden fire systems.

A classic Korean temple exterior

────────────────────────────

5. The Uncomfortable Truth

Seen through Western eyes, much of Korea’s “heritage” would be classed as reconstruction or replica.
Yet Korea defines authenticity differently - continuity of craft and meaning over material survival.

────────────────────────────

6. Where It Gets Problematic

Use of modern composite materials in “traditional” buildings creates tension:
• Acceptable - traditional techniques, natural materials.
• Debatable - hidden reinforcement.
• Questionable - concrete framed façades.
• Unacceptable - theme-park replicas.

Gyeongju’s newer projects lean toward the questionable: rapid, cheap, and hollow.

────────────────────────────

7. Does It Matter?

For historians and architects, yes - truth and provenance matter.
For most visitors, a convincing reconstruction can still evoke awe.
For Koreans, the living practice outweighs the original material.

────────────────────────────

8. A Clash of Philosophies

Western conservation values honesty of material and visible age.
Korea values continuity of form and cultural use.
Neither is wrong - but failing to explain the difference confuses outsiders.

──────────────────────────────

9. What Remains Authentic in Gyeongju

Seokguram Grotto - 8th century, original structure under glass.
Cheomseongdae Observatory - genuine 7th century stone tower.
Royal Tumuli -  original earth mounds, interiors reconstructed.
Anapji Pond -  partial original stonework.

Everything else: largely modern reconstruction.

────────────────────────────

10. The Eunpyeong Problem

Eunpyeong Hanok Village (2014 - 15) is luxury housing in disguise -
wide streets, composite gates, no historic core.
It markets nostalgia without authenticity.



These photos s.10 s.12 emphasise human-scale architecture and narrow lanes.

These show a modern “traditional style” development (luxury hanok-style housing) and a wide road through a heritage zone ! illustrating the contradiction.



────────────────────────────

11. Authentic vs Fake “Traditional” in Korea

Legitimate: Bukchon, Jeonju, and Namsangol Hanok Villages - all preserve historical layouts.
Fake: Eunpyeong and several Gyeongju sites - built for cars, not people.

────────────────────────────

12. The Scale Problem

Traditional Korea: narrow lanes, courtyards, walking pace.
Modern heritage: highways, parking lots, tourist grids.
Authentic form placed in inauthentic space.

A narrow lane in a hanok village (traditional Korean house district)

────────────────────────────

13. Why This Happens

  1. Tourism industrialisation - bus access dominates.
  2. Real-estate capitalism - “traditional” becomes a lifestyle brand.
  3. Loss of spatial literacy - planners ignore human scale.
  4. National pride optics - wide boulevards seen as modern prestige.

────────────────────────────

14. Gyeongju’s Specific Failure

Gyeongju today functions as an archaeological park built for vehicles.
The buildings remain, but the living city - its connective tissue - has vanished.

────────────────────────────

15. The Hidden Hierarchy of Conservation

  1. Building form and aesthetics
  2. Cultural meaning
  3. Construction technique
  4. Original materials
  5. Spatial relationships (rarely)
  6. Urban context (usually destroyed)

Rooflines are preserved while the context beneath them is erased.

────────────────────────────

16. Why Scale Matters

Traditional hanok villages offered intimacy and rhythm.
Modern “hanok” estates offer exposure and noise.
Scale, not just material, defines authenticity.

────────────────────────────

17. Composite Materials — The Cheap Shortcut

Real wood gates: ₩5 million and maintenance.
Composite gates: ₩800 k and none.
Authenticity traded for cost and convenience.

────────────────────────────

18. Where Authenticity Survives

In Seoul: Changdeokgung Secret Garden, Seochon, and Inwangsan shrines.
Beyond Seoul: Hahoe and Yangdong Villages, Seonunsa Temple.
These endure through remoteness and modest tourism pressure.

────────────────────────────

19. Gyeongju and Nara Compared

Nara, Japan, preserved pedestrian scale and hidden infrastructure.
Gyeongju prioritised car access.
The buildings may look authentic, but the soul of the city has gone.

────────────────────────────

20. The Broader Contradiction

Korea claims to value tradition yet often destroys the spatial context that gives it meaning.
Architects see space; planners see traffic flow.
The six-lane road through a UNESCO site says it all.

────────────────────────────

21. Conclusion

Korea’s heritage model excels at surface beauty but fails in spatial authenticity.
It preserves the look of tradition while losing its spirit -
heritage as theatre: convincing from afar, hollow up close.

─────────────────────────────



4. THE WONDER THAT IS KOREA

4 THE WONDER THAT IS KOREA


8 November 2025

Compiled from research and in-country investigations



Contents

A. The Korean Miracle

  1. The Korean Miracle
  2. The Human Cost
  3. Park’s Legacy
  4. Cinema as Mirror
  5. The National Dilemma
  6. The Answer So Far
  7. The Paradox

B. Confucian-Capitalism

  1. Definition
  2. Historical Roots
  3. Hierarchy in Practice
  4. The Contradiction
  5. The Future Question

C. Brief History of Korea

  1. Origins and Early Kingdoms (Prehistory - 668 CE)
  2. The Unified Silla and Goryeo Dynasties (668 - 1392)
  3. The Joseon Dynasty (1392 - 1897)
  4. Japanese Occupation (1910 - 1945)
  5. Division and the Korean War (1945 - 1953)
  6. South Korea’s Transformation (1960 - 2000s)
  7. Modern Korea (2000s - Present)


A The Korean Miracle

1. The Korean Miracle
In just 40 years, South Korea accomplished what took Western nations 150.
It leapt from poverty to technological powerhouse, from dictatorship to near-democracy, from Japanese colony to global cultural force.
The country’s transformation is often hailed as a model of disciplined modernisation and relentless drive.

2. The Human Cost
Economic triumph came with a profound social price.
South Korea built wealth but eroded cohesion.
Its culture of hyper-competition produces excellence - Samsung, BTS - yet discourages family life, depresses birth rates, and crushes individuality.
Success is measured by perfection; failure carries shame.

3. Park’s Legacy
Park Chung-hee’s authoritarian “miracle” rested on control, sacrifice, and dynastic capitalism.
His model delivered prosperity but embedded inequality and stress.
The system rewarded obedience and punished dissent - values that endure in business and education.

4. Cinema as Mirror
Films like Parasite and Squid Game expose South Korea’s contradictions.
Capitalism funds art that condemns capitalism - and the success of these films reinforces the system they critique.
The culture industry turns social pain into exportable profit.

5. The National Dilemma
Can Korea preserve prosperity without the pressure?
Can it dismantle the hierarchical chaebol (family-conglomerate) system without economic collapse?
Can it foster happiness in a society that trains children for 16-hour study days?

6. The Answer So Far
Not yet. The structure remains authoritarian, zero-sum, and unforgiving.
Individual wellbeing cannot thrive within a Confucian-capitalist hierarchy without systemic change.
To reform it risks unravelling the very fabric of success.

7. The Paradox
Highest suicide rates, lowest fertility, and extreme youth despair coexist with dazzling GDP growth.
South Korea stands as both miracle and warning - an economy that won the race yet lost its soul.
Perhaps the most successful failure in modern history.



B. Confucian-capitalism

1. Definition
Confucian-capitalism refers to the fusion of East Asian Confucian social values with Western-style capitalist economics.
It combines hierarchical obedience, family loyalty, and collective harmony with fierce competition and material ambition.
In South Korea, this mix created both social order and economic dynamism - but also intense conformity and pressure.

2. Historical Roots
Confucianism entered Korea through centuries of Chinese influence, valuing duty, discipline, education, and respect for hierarchy.
Under Park Chung-hee (1960s - 70s), these virtues were mobilised for national development: hard work became patriotism; obedience became efficiency.
The chaebol system (family-controlled conglomerates like Samsung, Hyundai, LG) mirrored Confucian family structures - paternal authority, top-down loyalty, moral hierarchy.

3. Hierarchy in Practice
In business: seniority outranks merit; challenging superiors is taboo; innovation is often constrained by status.
In education: rigid testing, rote learning, and rank obsession reflect the Confucian pursuit of scholarly perfection.
In gender: patriarchal expectations persist; women bear family and career burdens simultaneously.
In society: social harmony overrides individual expression - deviation is punished, conformity rewarded.

4. The Contradiction
Confucian values ensured discipline, but capitalism thrives on creativity and risk.
The result: a system that demands success but discourages questioning.
Productivity soars, yet mental health collapses; prosperity grows, yet birth rates plunge.
Hierarchy protects stability, but suffocates freedom.

5. The Future Question
Can Korea evolve from obedience to innovation?
Can it preserve community while embracing individuality?
Or will Confucian-capitalism, the engine of its rise, become the weight that prevents renewal?

Summary line
South Korea’s Confucian-capitalist hierarchy built its miracle - but now traps it, holding order and excellence in place at the cost of joy and imagination.


C Brief History of Korea

1. Origins and Early Kingdoms (Prehistory - 668 CE)
The Korean Peninsula was inhabited since the Neolithic period, with early tribal confederations forming around 1500 BCE.
The first recorded kingdom was Gojoseon (2333 BCE - 108 BCE, semi-mythical), said to be founded by Dangun.
After Chinese conquest of Gojoseon, Korea entered the Three Kingdoms era: Goguryeo in the north, Baekje in the southwest, and Silla in the southeast.
These states vied for dominance while absorbing Chinese influences - writing, Buddhism, bureaucracy - yet preserving distinct Korean culture.

2. The Unified Silla and Goryeo Dynasties (668 - 1392)
Silla, with Tang China’s help, unified most of the peninsula in 668 CE.
The Unified Silla period brought art, temple-building, and scholarship, but internal aristocratic corruption led to decline.
In 918, Goryeo (from which “Korea” derives) rose. It established civil service exams, produced celadon ceramics, and faced repeated invasions - Khitan, Mongol, and Jurchen.
Buddhism dominated, but Confucianism gained ground, setting the stage for the next era.

3. The Joseon Dynasty (1392 - 1897)
Founded by Yi Seong-gye, Joseon became one of Asia’s longest-lasting dynasties.
Neo-Confucianism replaced Buddhism as the state ideology, shaping Korea’s rigid class system and deep respect for education and authority.
In 1443, King Sejong introduced Hangul, the Korean alphabet - a landmark in cultural independence.
Isolationist policies in later centuries earned Korea the nickname “Hermit Kingdom.”
The dynasty weakened under internal corruption and foreign pressure, especially from Qing China and imperial Japan.

4. Japanese Occupation (1910 - 1945)
Japan annexed Korea in 1910, enforcing harsh colonial rule: forced labour, cultural suppression, name changes, and land seizures.
Industrialisation and infrastructure grew, but largely to benefit Japan.
Korean resistance movements formed both at home and abroad - notably the 1919 March 1st Movement.
The Japanese surrender in 1945 ended occupation but left Korea divided at the 38th parallel, under Soviet and American control.

5. Division and the Korean War (1945 - 1953)

North Korea was more dependent on the Soviet Union than was South Korea on American aid. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea faced a number of serious crises including starvation.

In 1948, two rival states emerged: North Korea (Kim Il-sung’s communist regime) and South Korea (Syngman Rhee’s US-backed government).
The Korean War (1950 - 53) devastated the peninsula, killing millions. The armistice created today’s Demilitarised Zone (DMZ), but no peace treaty was ever signed.
Both sides rebuilt separately - North through state socialism, South through aid and authoritarian capitalism.

It has to be remembered that the only reason the North was able to survive was because they received cheap fuel and food from Russia. Kim Il sung was hand picked by Stalin and lived in exile in Russia during Japanese occupation.


6. South Korea’s Transformation (1960 - 2000s)
After years of military rule, notably Park Chung-hee’s (1961-79), South Korea launched its economic miracle — export-driven industrialisation, infrastructure, and education. The situation today with Samsung and LG as examples shows that South Korea has gone left copying western or Chinese models far behind and is now very capable of technological innovation.
The 1980s saw democratic uprisings (notably Gwangju 1980), leading to free elections by 1987.
The country transitioned into a global manufacturing and technology hub, birthing giants like Samsung and Hyundai.

7. Modern Korea (2000s – Present)
South Korea now combines high-tech innovation with soft-power dominance: K-pop, film, gaming, and beauty industries.
Yet challenges persist: inequality, youth burnout, demographic collapse, and the ongoing North Korean threat.
North Korea remains isolated and militarised, ruled by the Kim dynasty.

Summary line
Korea’s history is a cycle of invasion, resilience, and reinvention — from Confucian kingdom to colonial subject, from war-scarred nation to global cultural and technological power.



Thursday, 6 November 2025

ZOHRAN NAMDANI

6 November 2025

There are a few things about him that I think will interest you, dear readers.


He seems very comfortable being a Muslim in America today, but in actual fact, he doesn’t really talk about religion in a formal or ideological way. From what I’ve seen of him on YouTube, he speaks more about humility and solidarity than about Islam itself.

For him, Islam feels like part of his background and his moral base. On that base he builds a sense of justice, dignity and inclusive community. That’s what matters most to him... fairness and respect for everyone, it's quite a sophisticated point of view and is certainly not “Islamic politics" as he would get little support if he were to talk like that in New York! 

So his message is about justice, humility, and the shared worth of every human being.... that is the standpoint of all the prophets.


In one clip, he said that growing up as a Muslim in New York helped him understand what it feels like to be marginalised or labelled as different; but otherwise not much to say in public about his own particular religion.

Overall, he comes across as a thoughtful, progressive, "a good guy" guy... someone who believes in mercy, fairness, and solidarity, without using that religious language. It's a kind of practical spirituality - faith expressed through helping others and working for a fairer society. That is the perfect politician! Many of the best political leaders have that quality, I mean their faith inspires them to serve others.


It will be interesting to see how far he can go in serving the interests of the 98% of New Yorkers who have little or nothing rather than, as in previous administrations, the 2% who have almost everything.

References

Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani won with a vision to make New York safe and affordable for all of its residents. Learn how his administration will hit the ground running to deliver on this agenda from day one.

Saturday, 1 November 2025

3. WHY MALAYSIA IS HOLDING ITSELF BACK

1 November 2025

Tag these articles: SEATMS

WHY MALAYSIA IS HOLDING ITSELF BACK

Malaysia’s growth model once delivered miracles. But the same system that built prosperity now anchors it. The middle-income trap isn’t about innovation alone — it’s about power, incentives, and fear of change.


1. The Middle-Income Trap Explained

Malaysia’s economy grew fast through industrialisation, export zones, and foreign investment. But now, wages are too high to compete with low-cost producers like Vietnam, and productivity too low to rival innovators like South Korea.
Economists call this the middle-income trap — when a nation climbs halfway up the ladder and then stops, unable to shift from imitation to innovation.


2. The Dependence Problem

Malaysia still relies heavily on multinational corporations for high-tech manufacturing. Local firms assemble, but rarely invent.
Tax breaks attract foreign capital, but the profits and patents mostly leave. There’s no self-sustaining innovation ecosystem, just a service chain for global giants.


3. Weak Productivity and R&D Conversion

Yes, Malaysia spends on research and higher education. But what comes out?
Few patents, weak university - industry linkages, and limited venture capital.
The innovation pipeline leaks at every stage - ideas exist, but commercialisation rarely happens. It needs a process: 

Ideas
 ->  university research
     -> startups
        -> commercialiation

What we call "science and technology".

4. Structural Comfort Zones

The system protects rather than challenges.
Government-linked companies dominate key sectors - oil, gas, plantations, banking - soaking up talent and capital.
These firms operate under political patronage, not market pressure. That means less competition, less innovation, and fewer new entrants.


5. Policy Paradox: Stability vs Dynamism

The ethnic quota system (New Economic Policy, NEP) provided stability, lifting millions of Malays into the middle class. But it also dampened meritocracy and competition.
Entrepreneurial energy moved abroad — to Singapore, Australia, and beyond.
Malaysia preserved peace, but at the cost of dynamism.


6. Talent Drain and Institutional Stagnation

Around two million Malaysians live and work overseas, many in fields Malaysia needs most: engineering, medicine, design, IT.
At home, bureaucracy, corruption, and rigid hierarchies discourage risk-taking. In a fast-moving world, that’s fatal.
As one economist put it: “Malaysia doesn’t lack brains. It lacks an environment that lets brains breathe.”


7. How Malaysia Could Reignite Growth

- Shift focus from ownership to performance: reward results, not race.

- Build true innovation clusters around universities and start-ups.

- Cut red tape that deters small entrepreneurs.

- Modernise education : creativity and problem-solving, not rote learning.

- Reduce dependence on state-linked corporations and open space for competition.


8. Conclusion: The Political Economy of Fear

Malaysia’s problem isn’t ignorance, it’s fear - fear of upsetting the balance that has kept peace for half a century.
But without bold reform, that balance will become stagnation.
Innovation needs friction, diversity, and trust - what's missing is the courage to let ideas win on merit.

Malaysia’s future depends on whether it can turn its pluralism from a handicap into an advantage; and its stability from a comfort zone into a platform for renewal.

2. MALAYSIA - COLONIAL LEGACY, MULTICULTURAL DILEMMA, FUTURE

1 November 2025

Malaysia is a story of compromise — between empire and independence, race and merit, politics and performance. Half a century after British rule ended, the country still wrestles with the question it inherited: how to build unity from diversity without losing either.


Tag these articles: SEATMS

2. MALAYSIA’S COLONIAL LEGACY AND MULTICULTURAL DILEMMA

Based on in-country interviews

1. The Colonial Blueprint

Modern Malaysia was built on British design. The Empire imported Chinese and Indian labourers to work in mines, plantations, and public works.

Malays were kept in agriculture and the civil service. This created a three-tier society: Malays on the land, Chinese in commerce, Indians in manual labour.

It was efficient for the colonial extractive economy but destructive for national unity. The British system separated communities into economic niches - what sociologists later called a plural society, where groups coexist without integrating.


2. The Ethnic Contract

Independence in 1957 handed power to a Malay-led coalition. The unspoken deal was simple: Malays would dominate politics, while the Chinese retained much of the economy.

In 1971, the New Economic Policy (NEP) formalised this through ethnic quotas for education, jobs and business ownership. It aimed for balance, but produced bureaucracy and resentment. This significant policy was developed following the race riots of 1969.

The 13 May 1969 "race riots" forced Malaysia into emergency rule, suspended Parliament and triggered the New Economic Policy, reshaping the nation’s race-based politics and economy. 

Half a century later, the NEP remains entrenched. Economic growth slowed as talented Malaysians - especially non-Malays - left for Singapore and beyond.


3. Diverging Destinies: Malaysia and Singapore

Singapore, under Lee Kuan Yew, rejected racial quotas. Meritocracy became law. Exam results, not ancestry, decided your future.

Malaysia, by contrast, kept ethnic safeguards in exchange for political peace. Both succeeded in their own way: Singapore rich but rigid, Malaysia stable but slow.

The contrast today is stark. Singapore’s GDP per capita exceeds Malaysia’s fourfold - the price and the reward of meritocracy.


4. The Resource Illusion

Malaysia appears wealthy. It has oil, gas, palm oil and tin. Yet this prosperity hides dependence.

Government-linked companies (GLCs) such as Petronas dominate key industries. They fund development, but they also fund political networks.

Scandals like 1MDB exposed how state control breeds corruption. Malaysia remains stuck in the middle-income trap - too costly for low-end production, too risk-averse for innovation.


5. Forgotten Minorities

Colonialism also produced hybrid communities - the Eurasians and Kristangs of Malacca. They are small in number, rich in heritage, but largely invisible politically.

They represent Malaysia’s cultural depth, yet the country rarely rewards diversity beyond symbolism.

Eurasians in Singapore, though a very small minority, have an economic and cultural impact that far outweighs their numbers... . they are "punching above their weight". Their distinct identity stems from centuries of cultural blending - mainly Portuguese, Dutch, British and local Malay lineages - producing a community fluent in both Western and Asian worlds.

They tend to excel in education, languages, arts, and also public service, often bridging cultural divides with characteristically natural ease. This adaptability - a blend of European discipline and Asian pragmatism if you like. This creative spirit, though perhaps visible politically, gives them a significant influence in law, media, and academia.

In the future, as Singapore and Southeast Asia move deeper into global multiculturalism, the Eurasian model of hybrid identity could become a social prototype: cosmopolitan, bilingual, rooted yet open. They represent what small nations increasingly need: people who can move between worlds without losing their own identities.


6. Crony Capitalism in Socialist Clothes

Malaysia is often called socialist. In truth, it practises state capitalism. The government owns and directs much of the economy, but for patronage rather than equality.

The NEP’s ethnic balancing replaced class struggle with racial entitlement. There is no strong welfare state, weak labour rights, and underfunded healthcare.

Wealth flows upward through GLCs, not downward through redistribution. It’s capitalism with ethnic quotas - or, as one of the interviewees put it, “socialism for the connected.”


7. Singapore’s Counterpoint

Singapore’s model is the mirror image: small, centralised, technocratic.

Lee Kuan Yew enforced efficiency, not comfort. Civil rights were secondary to results.

Malaysia values pluralism; Singapore values performance. One protects identity, the other rewards achievement. Both exclude something essential - Malaysia lacks drive, Singapore lacks warmth.


8. The Malaysian Crossroads

Malaysia faces a defining choice:

- Continue with ethnic protectionism and risk long-term stagnation.

- Or shift towards meritocracy and risk social upheaval.

The brightest Malaysians are already voting with their feet. The country risks losing not just its talent, but its confidence.


9. Lessons from the Colonial Past

The British left Malaysia with roads, schools, legal system, accounting practises, a parliament even ... and also divisions.

The challenge now is not to erase difference, but to modernise it ie to turn diversity into "strength rather than suspicion".

If Malaysia can elevate merit over ethnicity, cooperation over patronage, its pluralism could become its greatest asset.


10. Conclusion

Malaysia’s struggle is not about geography or race. It is about governance.

Colonial structures still shape its politics, but they need not define its future.

The question is no longer who owns the soil 

(Bumiputra = indigenous Malays given preferential rights in the name of national equity and stability),

but how to organise the future.

Friday, 31 October 2025

POWER AND THE GEOGRAPHICAL PIVOT OF HISTORY

31 October 2025

THE GEOGRAPHICAL PIVOT OF HISTORY

Background

Let's get under the skin of these global power players - such as the neocons - and feel where they are coming from. 

The fundamental number one essential idea that we must understand before everything else is that the battle is about global sovereignty. Sovereignty, power, is primordial because no one wants to have a boss and be told what to do - instead if it is you the global sovereign then it is you that sets the rules for everyone else and if it is not to you then you have to follow someone else's rules at the expense of your own interests. The elite got there because they are - unlike most of us - interested in pure power, control and setting the rules and agenda for others to dance to.

Summary

Over one hundred years ago, Halford Mackinder warned that control of the Eurasian landmass would decide the fate of global power. Today, as land powers rise and maritime empires weaken, his warning feels prophetic. The West still believes it commands the seas — yet it is strategy, not geography, that has changed the game.


1. The Central Idea
• Geopolitics means the study of how geography shapes this power - political power to decide who gets what in the carve up.
• Mackinder’s focus was Eurasia — the vast continent linking Europe and Asia, stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Arctic to the Arabian Sea.
• His principle was blunt - who controls Eurasia controls the world. It goes like this:
"Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland;
who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island;
who rules the World-Island commands the world."
• For centuries, this single geographical fact has driven the rivalries that defined power and global history.
2. From Silk Road to Sea Power
• Ancient Eurasia was connected by the Silk Road - decentralised land and sea routes carrying ideas, culture, and goods.
• The Mongols were the last to keep that system open. Its collapse in the 14th century gave way, two centuries later, to a maritime revolution.
• European explorers - Magellan, da Gama, Díaz - linked continents by sea, creating a new power system centred on ports and maritime choke points.
• Maritime trade could be monopolised; land trade could not. And with the Industrial Revolution, European powers gained the technology to dominate both commerce and colonisation. Financial was the third source of British power.

3. Pax Britannica: The First Global Sea Empire
• By the 19th century, Britain had defeated France and Napoleon, establishing Pax Britannica, a century of peace enforced by naval supremacy.
• The Royal Navy’s control of global routes was the backbone of world order, later inherited by the United States.
• Yet during this same period, Russia’s push through Central Asia exposed Britain’s vulnerability: sea power alone could not control the interior of Eurasia.
• The 19th-century Great Game. This was the long duel between Britain and Russia over Central Asia that ended with Afghanistan as a buffer state. But the Trans-Siberian Railway soon gave land power a new reach from Moscow to the Pacific.

4. Mackinder’s Warning
• In 1904, Mackinder presented The Geographical Pivot of History to the Royal Geographical Society.
• His warning: the industrial age and the railway had erased the sea’s monopoly. Land powers could now move armies, goods, and ideas across Eurasia faster than fleets.
• His famous formula: Who rules Eastern Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; Who rules the World-Island commands the World.
• For the British, and later the Americans, this became strategic gospel.

5. From Empire to Containment
• The United States adopted Mackinder’s logic after 1945.
• National Security documents from 1948 onwards spoke of preventing any single power from dominating the Eurasian landmass.
• America’s answer was to control the maritime periphery ie Europe in the west, Japan and the island chains off China in the east. This is a belt of bases and alliances known as “containment.”
• The logic was simple: keep the Heartland divided: prevent Russia, Germany, or China from uniting.

6. The Eurasian Response
• Russian thinkers such as Savitsky proposed an alternative: cooperation across the continent instead of division from the sea.
• The tragedy of Russia, they said, was pretending to be a Western maritime power. Its natural destiny was continental.
• After the fall of the Soviet Union, Moscow still turned West, hoping for a “Greater Europe.”
• Washington, however, pursued the Wolfowitz Doctrine (1992), declaring that no rival, friend nor foe, should ever rise again in Eurasia. Even allies like Germany or Japan were viewed as potential competitors.

7. America’s Grand Chessboard
• Zbigniew Brzezinski, advisor to several presidents, refined the doctrine in The Grand Chessboard (1997).
• US dominance, he argued, required keeping Eurasian powers divided and dependent on American security.
• Hence the modern alliance blocs: on one side dependent vassals, on the other contained adversaries.
• Russia, weakened, became what Brzezinski called a “geostrategic black hole.” If it resisted, it should be broken into smaller regions.
• Simultaneously, Washington launched its own “Silk Road” projects : pipelines and corridors designed not to unite Eurasia but to sever Central Asia from Russia and China.

8. The Eurasian Turn
• Around 2014, the pattern began to break.
• The coup in Ukraine ended Moscow’s hopes for a shared European order.
• Meanwhile, China lost faith in the US-led global system and launched the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a 21st-century Silk Road linking continents by land, sea, and fibre-optic cable.
• Russia, turning east, joined with China in what Mackinder would have called his worst nightmare: two continental giants, side by side, building infrastructure, banks, and trade routes beyond maritime control.

9. Multipolar Eurasia
• The new projects - BRI, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, and BRICS - now link much of Asia, West Asia (the Middle East), and parts of Africa.
• The International North-South Transport Corridor connects Russia, Iran, and India. The Northern Sea Route along the Arctic shortens Europe-Asia trade and is outside US naval reach.
• From South Korea to Turkey, nations are aligning around practical cooperation. No one power can impose terms; interests must be harmonised for land powers.
• The logic has shifted from hegemony to multipolarity: shared power, regional balance, pragmatic trade.

10. The Western Dilemma
• The West still clings to the illusion of control.
• Freezing Russian funds, sanctioning Chinese tech, and weaponising finance have only convinced others to seek alternatives.
• The result is self-isolation: the more coercive the system becomes, the faster partners look east.
• What once was an empire of sea routes is becoming "an archipelago of fear".
• Mackinder’s law endures: geography does not care about ideology.

11. A Realist’s Reflection
• I want the West to survive, but survival demands adaptation.
• Our elites cling to narratives that made sense a century ago; today, their arrogance blinds them to a world no longer theirs.
• Multipolarity is not collapse; it’s correction. Yet our refusal to accept it will turn adjustment into breakdown and collapse.
• As Machiavelli warned: Men see things not as they are, but as they wish them to be ... and they are ruined.

12. The Asian Future
• Dostoyevsky wrote: “Russians are as much Asiatic as European... It is time to turn away from ungrateful Europe; our future is in Asia.”
• That line now feels prophetic. The West’s contempt has pushed the centre of gravity eastwards.
• The new Silk Roads - routes, railways, data cables, pipelines - are already remapping the world.
• We are watching the end of five centuries of sea power and the rebirth of the land.

Glossary
• Geopolitics – how geography shapes power and policy.
• Heartland – Mackinder’s core of Eurasia, from Eastern Europe to Siberia.
• World-Island – the joined continents of Eurasia and Africa.
• Multipolarity – distribution of power among several centres.
• Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – China’s global infrastructure and trade strategy.
• INSTC – International North–South Transport Corridor (Russia-Iran-India).

References
• Halford J. Mackinder, The Geographical Pivot of History (1904).
• Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard (1997).
• “Defense Planning Guidance” (1992) – Wolfowitz Doctrine.
• US National Security Strategy (1988).
• Official papers on BRI, AIIB, and INSTC (2013–2015).

Thursday, 30 October 2025

WHEN EMPIRES COLLAPSE... WHAT WILL "COLLAPSE" LOOK LIKE

30 October 2025

This is what collapse looks like:

Institutions stop functioning, governments lose authority and break their own as well as international rules
Currencies lose value, savings evaporate, at first there is a rush for the dollar and then it is abandoned, hard assets and necessities keep pace with inflation, trade freezes up
Elites turn on each other, Pinky and Perky become Punch and Judy, from consensus to chaos, while the public can only think "survival"
Infrastructure decays, borders blur, society fragments, the military fractures.

What we have is a dominant centre (the U.S./ West, maritime) that builds globalisation, then overspends and overextends, and now faces rival powers (China, continental) and structural fatigue. 

The next crisis won’t be just economic this time... it will reflect a systemic shift to a multi-nodal global order, a moment where the US empire no longer holds the levers of power it once did.... and has shown no signs of being able to adapt to this kind of Order (they won't listen, they send in the military; where common sense suggests they should negotiate a losing hand).

The signs are with us. The collapse isn’t far, it’s set up already.... we have a sequence but no clear timeline. For sure, it won’t all fail at once, it'll unravel piece by piece, until a normal, stable and surprise-free life becomes a distant memory.... then there will be a recalibration and New Order of some sort.

Here is a five-stage sequence of collapse, with brief examples illustrating each step.


1. Fiscal Overstretch - Living Beyond Means

  • Empires spend more than they earn — on welfare, wars, and vanity projects.
  • Example: Late-stage Rome debased its coinage to fund armies; the U.S. will incur a $2 trillion deficit this year.

2. Market Rebellion - The Bond Revolt

  • Investors lose confidence and demand higher interest to lend. Debt servicing balloons; new borrowing pays off old debt ("debt monetisation" aka a Ponzi scheme).
  • Example: The U.K.’s 2022 gilt crisis forced the Bank of England to step in; Italy in 2011 nearly went insolvent on rising yields.

3. Currency Erosion - Printing and Panic

  • Central banks print to cover deficits. Inflation eats savings, capital flees, gold and hard assets soar.
  • Example: Weimar Germany 1923; more mildly, the post-Covid surge of U.S. money supply that fuelled asset inflation.

4. Social Fracture - The Revolt of the Debtors

  • Prices rise, wages stagnate in real terms, services collapse. Trust in elites erodes; protests and populists fill the streets.
  • Example: France’s gilets jaunes; U.S. polarisation and street unrest; collapsing faith in parliaments (in democracy) across Europe.

5. Institutional Breakdown - From Gridlock to Chaos

  • Governments turn inward, bureaucracy freezes, corruption explodes, freedoms are restricted and the military or regions assert autonomy.
  • Example: Late-Soviet paralysis in the 1980s; Washington gridlock and politicised justice today; failing states in West Asia from Lebanon to Libya; France's five Prime Ministers (5, sic) since 2022.

Summary
Collapse starts slowly in the bond markets, moves through money, and ends in public rebellion. Collapse is when people stop believing the system can fix itself.
That’s how empires die, that's how this Empire will die: first financially, then socially, then spiritually.



Wednesday, 29 October 2025

END-STAGE EMPIRES ARE RUN BY THEIR BANKERS

29 October 2025

Bessent steps in to protect profits of friendly investors.


FINANCIAL RESCUE AS IMPERIAL OVERREACH

The strange case of an American Treasury Secretary covering massive hedge fund losses with public money.

Bessent, Argentina, and the American Taxpayer.


1. Story – The Bailout Nobody Asked For

Scott Bessent, U.S. Treasury Secretary and long-time Wall Street insider, has brokered a US$20 billion rescue swap with Argentina.
Officially, it’s designed to stabilise a struggling emerging-market partner.
In practice, it protects U.S. hedge funds - notably BlackRock, Pimco and Fidelity - from heavy losses on their Argentine bond positions.

Bessent’s history with these hedge funds goes back decades. Many now see this as a bailout for his old financial friends, not a policy in the interests of the American taxpayer, who shoulders the inflationary and fiscal costs.
Argentina’s inflation, at over 250%, and its looming debt repayments make this a highly risky commitment of U.S. backing.
(Buenos Aires Times source)


2. Context – Empire’s Financial Reflex

This episode illustrates a deeper trend in late-stage empire economics:
- The financial and political centres of power have fused
- Wall Street gambles abroad, and when those gambles fail, Washington steps in.

Rather than allowing markets to clear the mess themselves, the imperial centre props up its own capital class, diverting public money away from domestic renewal.
This is not new — it is a recurring pattern in end-of-empire histories.
The centre protects capital flows outward, while the periphery remains indebted and dependent.


3. The Moral Hazard Machine

Such rescues create what economists call moral hazard:
- investors take reckless risks knowing they’ll be saved

- taxpayers face austerity measures (cuts in services) and/ or tax rises, to cover bailouts.

The results are predictable:

Resource diversion - tax and Treasury support flow to global finance, not to Main Street

Accountability collapse - bailouts happen and the press gives out diplomatically worded cover stories (aka propaganda) to keep us on board
Erosion of legitimacy - meanwhile, ordinary citizens are not stupid and know very well when elite speculation has gone wrong.

How is it possible to reform a financial system when the stability depends on shielding the same insiders who caused the instability in the first place? ... reform becomes impossible.


4. End-of-Empire Paradigm

Historically, empires in decline exhibit three common traits:

  1. Finance captures the state - public institutions serve private capital
  2. Financial overreach - production is outsourced to vassal states, but instead of profits being reinvested into (real) resources and further productive capacity, they are put into financial (paper) assets like treasury bonds and stock markets and property 
  3. Legitimacy loss - citizens sense the rules no longer apply equally - asset prices inflate for the rich, while High Street prices inflate for the remaining 95+%.

Bessent’s Argentina deal shows an imperial centre spending its dwindling credibility to protect its own network ie a short-term fix that further deepens long-term fragility.


5. Outlook - When Empires Become Credit Lines

This is what happens when finance replaces industry as the core of power. The global trade reserve status of the dollar gives America and its financial class immense power as we see in this case, but is also the cause of its undoing.
An empire once built on production and innovation now survives by extending credit (printing)  to others and to itself - it monetises its debt ie borrows more and more at the short end and prints money to cover the mounting interest payments and debt rollover repayments.

Such cycles always end the same way:
the financial core overextends, confidence and trust erodes, the bailouts become bigger, the taxpayers angrier, the legitimacy thinner, until the system collapses under its own weight.

What does "collapse" look like?

At each deal like this one, policy-makers push the can a little further down the road, saving the system temporarily... but only for themselves.


References
Buenos Aires Times, “Bessent steps in to protect profits of friendly investors in Argentina” (Oct 2025)
Ray Dalio, Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order (2021)
Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (1987)


When Empires Bail Out Their Financiers, short term stability leads to chronic fragility.

Monday, 27 October 2025

HOW THE FOURTH TURNING WILL PAN OUT

27 October 2026

See the post describing Collapse





You really cant make this stuff up. Strategic planning? Bring back Ronald Reagan! And he told the best jokes.

Indeed you cannot make this stuff up and it's the delusional character of Western thinking....but where does this come from?

If you've read Mackinder, you'll see why being the global hegemon is so because you answer to no one unlike everyone else who answers to you and this power means you set the rules for others to follow rules which work to your advantage.

But in this piece we will consider that this single-minded obsession with hegemony, globalisation and free money (from the dollar's reserve status) is delusional because illusory and unsustainable ie unreal and unstable. Reality is real efforts not a financial reality is gold rather than fiat currency. So the idea of investing is to build up real assets rather than paper.

What is going to change over time, is that these hegemonic ideas will come to be seen by most people as delusional and reckless as the real idea is to build up your physical assets because paper financial fiat assets do not last. Consider the following:

- If Russia is a threat, balance of power and security arrangements and cooperation over global issues are the best way to deal with it, not through expansionism
- you cannot just barge into countries and steal the resources 
- people will lend you money if they can be assured that it won't be devalued and it will be repaid in full
- success comes from innovation, production and export - not from borrowing and consumption
- investors will move from speculation back to production and essentials (energy, food, defence)
- diplomacy and cooperation will trump military and conflict
- a successful economy is the start and so Western Europe must join up with Russia for its resources and china for its technology and get market share
- the people are the final arbiters and they want stability protection and prosperity - PEACE - they are not interested in ideology gambling and war
- those who want local and sovereign will triumph over those who want global and authoritarian
- I do think equality will prevail over apartheid, and genocide will send a state to hell (literally to hell, to Armageddon, as genocide is suicide and sends a state and its people to hell).

From what I've read and understood over the last two or three years, this is what I think is going to happen - this prognosis is basically all those debt cycles and End-of-Empire stories retold in a Fourth Turning kind of way.