Monday, 13 October 2025

2. THREE GOLD ETFs WORTH CONSIDERING

13 October 2025



1. Reflections on portfolio construction

2. Trader’s Take section in gold ETFs

See previous article.

1. Balancing Gold with the Real Economy

A sound portfolio doesn’t live on bullion alone. Gold provides the bedrock - protection against monetary folly and market tremors - but lasting wealth also needs exposure to the productive world. Alongside a core weighted towards gold and miners, investors should hold select equities in energy and industrials, the two sectors most closely tied to tangible output and inflation dynamics. This combination anchors the portfolio in real assets while still capturing the pulse of economic growth.

2. ETFs Worth Considering

SGLN – iShares Physical Gold ETC
TER 0.12 % | AUM ≈ £13 billion
SGLN is the simplest sterling-denominated route to hold physical gold. Each share is backed by allocated bullion (?) stored in London vaults, tracking the spot price almost perfectly and remaining unhedged to the US dollar. It’s a low-cost, transparent way to preserve purchasing power or hedge against monetary excess.

AUCP – Legal & General Gold Mining UCITS ETF
TER 0.65 % | AUM ≈ $400 million
AUCP tracks the FTSE Gold Mines Index, providing exposure to leading global gold-mining companies such as Newmont, Barrick and Agnico Eagle. It sits between pure bullion and high-risk junior miners, offering leverage to gold prices without extreme volatility. In strong bull phases, AUCP tends to outperform the metal; in corrections, it retreats faster. Its higher TER reflects the costs of maintaining sector purity and global weighting.

GDXJ – VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF
TER 0.55 % | AUM ≈ $4 billion
GDXJ invests in smaller, fast-growing exploration and development miners. It brings higher potential returns - and greater volatility - than large-cap funds like AUCP. When gold rallies, juniors can surge; when sentiment turns, they can fall hard. Best suited to investors who understand the cycle and can ride the swings of this high-beta segment.


Trader’s Take: How to blend the three in one gold strategy

Together, these three funds offer a complete exposure to gold’s ecosystem: SGLN anchors the portfolio in physical metal, the ultimate store of value; AUCP adds torque through major miners leveraged to gold prices; and GDXJ supplies the speculative edge via junior explorers with outsized upside in a bull cycle. In a stagflationary world where real assets regain power over paper promises, a balanced mix of roughly 50% SGLN, 30% AUCP and 20% GDXJ offers both defence and opportunity - the timeless metal, the producers, and the dreamers who dig it out of the ground.



Saturday, 11 October 2025

DO WE WANT OR NEED A DIGITAL ID CARD

11 October 2025

What do they really want?? They want us to have nothing and be happy.
What do we want? Freedom, security and equality.



Of these, freedom for us individualists is the greatest. (In that video, the author mentions China. If it "works" for them, it could be because they put the community first, before the individual, and they seek harmony over freedom.)

Freedom means free to do, think, and live according to my own choices, with minimal interference from the state, big business, or social coercions. It's freedom from interference and it's freedom to develop my maximum according to my possibilities.

It's a qualitative thing, how you feel, but could some quantitative scale be assembled against which the unique ID number identifier proposal could be judged?

The benefits Starmer offers in that video clip are poppycock. The implementation risks are in that video. Where are the costs to us living under this freaky control regime? We in the West no longer live in true democracies, and unfortunately the "technocrats" who govern operate a global governance organisation, they view government as a tool that functions best under competent leadership, irrespective of the democratic quality of the system, except that recent leaders defer to Washington and show little sign of competence - look at this ID card idea ... will it turn out like HS2 or the poll tax or the Covid lockdowns - examples where competent leaders may still make poor decisions if they lack a robust guiding philosophy. Except rhat now we have Starmer.

Contrast this with sadly departed Frank Field, influenced by a fading Christian socialist tradition. Frank Field emphasised the dangers of rationalism (aka technical competence) in politics. He advocated for acknowledging human nature's limitations and promoting "self-interested altruism".

What's left of the benefits of being alive today? To answer this q, just assess how much control we individuals would have left over our lives across political, economic, social, digital, and psychological dimensions.

Monday, 6 October 2025

KEY DATES RECAP OF UKRAINE PROXY WAR

6 October 2025

Russophobia is a good label, but this is a string of eurasian wars going back a long long way. 

The privatisations (Maggie in UK and in Europe there was eg Schroder) of the 1990s and 2000s freed up a lot of capital and some got invested in eastern europe and ukraine - investors want a return on that. 

Then there's been falling rate of profit for the last 40 yrs. To restore profits and productivity means reducing input costs and forever opening new markets.

I'd say this was why we have these forever wars - they are forever revenue streams for the MIC 

Plus, dual use technology (military / commercial - amazon aws, tesla starlink...) created The Magnificent Seven (now plus Palantir)....that's digital capitalism.

It's especially bad for Europe with the failure of sanctions and blowback.

This mismanagement created by our elites led by "the donor class" would be extremely bad for their futures.

The result: in Ukraine, an unwinnable war that the West cannot afford to end for economic reasons - trapped between hubris and collapse. Call it what you like - Russian expansionism or Western post-colonial liberal imperialism.




KEY DATES IN EURASIAN HISTORY AND GEOPOLITICS

  • 434 – 453 Attila the Hun – Huns raid Europe; Rome weakened.
  • 882 – 1240 Kievan Rus’ – Prince Oleg unites Slavic tribes under Viking rule.
  • 988 Conversion to Christianity – aligns Kievan Rus’ with Byzantium.
  • 1054 The Great Schism – split between Catholic Rome and Orthodox Constantinople.
  • 1206 – 1227 Genghis Khan – creates the Mongol Empire, opens Silk Road.
  • 1240 Mongol invasion – Kievan Rus’ collapses; birth of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus.
  • 1853 – 1856 First Crimean War – Britain defends route to India.
  • 1904 & 1920 Halford Mackinder – formulates Heartland Theory of geopolitics.
  • 1917 Communist Revolution – birth of the Soviet Union.
  • 1945 – 1989/91 WWII and Cold War – Soviet control of Central Europe.
  • 1994 Clinton – NATO expansion announced (Brussels & Prague).
  • 2004 Orange Revolution – Yanukovych ousted; pro-West turn.
  • 2007 Putin’s Munich Speech – warns NATO expansion a “serious provocation.”
  • 2008 Bucharest Summit – Ukraine & Georgia promised NATO membership.
  • 2014 Maidan Revolution – Yanukovych deposed; Crimea annexed; Donbas war.
  • 2014 & 2015 Minsk Agreements – ceasefires fail to hold.
  • 2022 – present Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine.

KEY ECONOMIC REASONS FOR CONTINUING EURASIAN WAR - WHY THE WEST CANNOT PULL OUT

The West is trapped by its own money, politics, and pride. 

• 1990s - 2000s - Western banks and governments pour capital from privatisations into Eastern Europe, expecting profits from cheap labour and resources - especially Ukraine’s wealth.

• 1980s on  productivity and "profit rate" falling for rhe last 40 years at home, creating economic necessity to reduce input costs, improve efficiencies, open new markets

• 1955 on Forever wars fought not to win, but to sustain the system behind it.

     - 1950 - 53 - Proof of ConceptKorea

     - 1955 - 75 - Pilot: Vietnam

     -  9/11 - Bin Laden accuses U.S. of: occupying the Arabian Peninsula ; supporting crusader entity Israel’s oppression of Palestinians ; killing Muslims through sanctions and bombings

     - 2001 on  - Rollout - Globalisation of the concept : US declares global, borderless War on Terror. Rollout to Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iran, Venezuela? Continuous or "forever wars".

     - 2022 - The wars feed a system of digital capitalism, where defence and tech giants develop latest techno profit from dual-use innovations — drones, satellites, AI, and surveillance....meg7.

• 1990s - 2008, 2009 - 2021 The conflict in Ukraine itself has become a revenue stream for the donor class, not a strategic mission in the interests of the American people.

• 2023 - Sanctions backfired, weakening European economies and further driving up debt, energy costs, and public discontent.

• Now - Ending the war would mean admitting policy failure, exposing elite mismanagement and corruption, destruction of careers, legal pursuit and prison

• The result: an unwinnable war that the West cannot afford to end - trapped between hubris and collapse. Russian expansionism or Western post-colonial liberal imperialism?

I would say you can put it down to fear of the Russian bear or you can go on to highlight American global agapani or you can go further and identify the economic reasons behind this war and why the West cannot pull out.

[End]



Friday, 3 October 2025

FULL ENGLISH BREAKFAST

3 October 2025



This is the Sharia-compliant English Full Halal Breakfast, so please note the plate behind is the original native version. Also noticed: no women - this would be because they are at home taking care of the bairns. And no rice, no veggies.

For the class-conscious of yesteryear (you don't see many greasy spoons these days - we're all middle class now) the trouble was the cafe's in the wrong place - it's in middle class London and you need to go to a lower class neighbourhood to get rhe real full flavour of a Full English Breakfast.

Next time, we will adventure into a more working-class area. Then I can take the photos, including of yesterday's tomato ketchup drying on the table ... that kind of thing. THE REAL DEAL.

An Full English Breakfast can only be equalled by a Full Scottish Breakfast. Unfortunately, I didn't find haggis slice or tattie scone on the menu, and sadly no pickled beetroot on the table. For drinks, there was A. G. Barr's famous Irn Bru, it's true, but I wanted unsugared - you have to say it twice - "no sugar please" strong builder’s tea.

I forgot the sides of square sausage - Lorne it's called. 

Yes, this is cholesterol-heavy comfort foods, soaked up with tea, and cholesterol is back on healthy menus.

Eat in luxury

[End]

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

UKRAINE - WHY THE WEST CANNOT WALK AWAY

30 September 2025

- Why The West Cannot Stop Fighting the War in Ukraine 
- Why the West has No Reverse Gear 
- Why the only option is to Double Down On Failure.

Here are six fundamental reasons.

1. Liquidity Pipeline – European privatisations and savings poured into U.S. equity markets from the privatisations of the 1990s and early 2000s. That capital, recycled through Wall Street and shadow banking, demands returns from Eastern Europe, especially Ukraine. The banks want their pound of flesh.

 2002 Germany: Schröder’s tax reform let firms sell cross-holdings tax-free, releasing billions for investment into U.S. dollars in stocks and bonds.

 France (1990s–2000s): Privatisations of France Télécom, Air France and Renault freed more capital, that flowed to Wall Street.

 Italy (Prodi–Berlusconi era): Sales of ENI, Telecom Italia and Autostrade drove Italian savings, this time, into U.S. Treasuries.

 Post-2008 GFC: Europe’s tighter bank rules pushed investment out of this regulated sector and into U.S. hedge funds and private equity - the “shadow-banking” boom, as it's called.
Reason 1 : - Finance demands a return on investment

2. Productivity Crisis – Falling productivity these last 40 years across the West pressures profits. Access to cheap resources, labour, and new markets is vital. Russia blocks this. War becomes a way to prise open frontiers of profit.

Lower productivity → thinner margins → pressure to cut costs and find new revenue streams. That pressure expresses itself in four ways:

• Reducing input costs (energy, minerals, resources)
• Reducing labour costs (off-shoring, precarious work, gig economy, WFH, wage stagnation)
• Rationalising production (Six Sigma, automation, AI)
• Opening new sales markets.


Reason 2 : - Restore profitability to stave off a crisis of capitalism

3. Digital Capitalism – Tech and defence firms thrive on dual-use (military / civilian) innovations: AI, satellites, surveillance. For them, a “forever war” means a forever revenue stream, regardless of who's winning on the ground. This is a big source of revenues for the donor class.

Examples:

Amazon AWS & Microsoft Azure host Pentagon and CIA data.
Google builds AI for drone targeting.
• Palantir sells battlefield analytics to Ukraine.
SpaceX Starlink provides frontline ISR communications under Pentagon funding
Buying up influencers and their social media platforms - eg twitter, tiktok - and correcting the algorithms to support the sponsor class and obtain future leaders' alignment.


This “digital war machine” thrives on ongoing conflict, it doesn’t really need victory, indeed victory may end its revenue streams. For venture capitalists and contractors, a forever war is a forever market. Whether Ukraine wins or loses matters less than the continuation of DoD contracts, subsidies, and data monopolies.


Reason 3 : - A forever war means a forever revenue stream for Big Tech

4. Avoiding Failure in Europe – Sanctions have backfired, confiscations only further reduce credibility, leaving Europe weaker, indebted, and angry. Ending the war now would expose elite mismanagement and the continued existence of the EU; war keeps the parties united against a common enemy.

 What values or morals do our elite leaders really have? Don't they align with Washington to further their interests and power rather than represent the people who elected them?

 Just consider what has happened to the democratic process or how the people's freedoms are increasingly frustrated. 

 Continuation of the war postpones the eventual day of  reckoning for these people.... who or how can we stop this killing which profits the few at the top?

Reason 4 : - To stop now would mean bringing the culprits to Justice - how to do this?

5. The EndgameVictory for the West against Russia would pin Russia in place geopolitically, secure Ukraine’s resources for central bank balance sheets, and free America to pivot to China. Defeat risks NATO’s collapse, euro / EU instability and implosion, and even escalation to World War Three, never mind the power, futures and wealth of existing elites.


Reason 5 : - Victory would deliver geopolitical defeat over Russia and open up access to Ukraine's resources. Defeat would be a defeat of The West, its credibility and institutions.

Here is an expanded paragraph in your style — same tone, same cadence — with sharper emphasis on soft-power perks, lifestyle privileges, and the personal incentives that bind the EU–Atlantic elite to the system:


6. Fingers in Pie Europe’s elite defend Ukraine not out of principle or moral rectitude, but because their own privileges, perks and soft-power networks depend on keeping the system alive.

Behind all this economic and corporate interest sits the soft-power ecosystem that keeps the whole elite structure obedient and aligned. 

The top brass who run the EU and its satellite institutions enjoy a lifestyle that depends on never rocking the boat: children in international schools with fees "absorbed"; endless “conferences” in Davos, Brussels, Singapore, Dubai - week-long holidays disguised as policy forums; salaries, working week and pensions that no normal European could ever dream of; diplomatic immunities, expense allowances and tax exemptions that insulate them from the economic pain they inflict on others. 

This is the real glue of the system, the comfortable capture of a managerial class - maybe two or three million members of the elite, banking and corporate governance, government, MSM - whose personal incentives are perfectly aligned with Washington, global finance and the shadow-banking world. 

Once you see how these perks function as a form of soft coercion, you understand why none of these people will ever argue for peace, restraint, sovereignty or strategic independence. Their lives depend on the opposite.

-----

Some further light reading

European economic collapse and democratic despotism with Glen Diesen and Alex Krainer.


[END]

Sunday, 28 September 2025

HISTORY RHYMES - FROM ALEXANDER TO AMERICA

28 September 2025


History Rhymes - From Alexander to America


1. The Rise of Macedon

Alexander the Great took a small Balkan kingdom and turned it into the largest empire the world had yet seen.

In little more than a decade, his armies swept through Persia, Egypt, and deep into Asia.

It was dazzling... but fragile - built on one man’s genius, charisma, and willpower.

2. The Fall of Macedon

Alexander died suddenly in 323 BC.

With no strong institutions to hold his empire together, his generals (the Diadochi) carved up the empire.

What was unity became patchwork: Macedonia, Egypt, Seleucid Asia, each fighting for supremacy.

The legacy was cultural, not political: Hellenistic civilisation spread, but the empire itself shattered.

3. The Rise of America

From 1945, the United States inherited global leadership.

Its reach was unmatched: military bases worldwide, the dollar as reserve currency, technology dominance and culture as soft power.

After 1991, America enjoyed its “unipolar moment”, the sole and unrivaled superpower, right through to the serious rise of China in from about 2017.

4. The Strains of Empire

Overreach followed: endless wars in the Middle East for control of the energy supply, twin spiralling debts, a semi delusional ideology of exceptionalism and a belief that one country could police the globe.

But like Macedon, the empire stretched further than its base could sustain.

The façade of invincibility cracked.

5. The Fragmentation Today

Under Biden and Trump, America is no longer a unifying empire - unless you say that it is unifying the global South against itself. It is faltering.

Retreat from Europe, repositioning out to the second island ring in East Asia, and chaos in West Asia... all point to withdrawal.

Allies, once loyal clients, are hedging their bets: Europe submits and clings to America’s coattails, Israel defies (as usual), Asia balances between Washington and Beijing.

What remains looks like Alexander’s world after his death — a multi-polar patchwork of rival powers.

6. The Rhyme of History

One-man dependency: Alexander then, is this what Trump is trying to create now?

Overstretch: the usual disease of empire.

Fragmentation: Alexander’s generals then, America’s vassal states / the EU and Britain today.

Legacy: Western civilisation and influence may remain for 500 more years, but the empire itself is disintegrating.

Conclusion

“History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes”. (Supposedly Mark Twain.)

Alexander’s empire rose dazzlingly fast and collapsed just as suddenly.

The American empire, handed over by Britain after the last world war, and extended in the typically excessive pride of emperors, is now showing its age in the same patterns of exhaustion and fracture.

How the wheel turns, break up from within, ordinary people finally pushing back against their elites.

Friday, 26 September 2025

3/3 GLOBALISATION AND RICARDIAN ECONOMICS : THE NEO LIBERAL TRAP

26 September 2025



Trilogy:
  1. The Collapse of the American Empire (1/3).
  2. Singapore: How to Avoid the Same Fate (2/3).
  3. Globalisation and Neoliberalism: The Ricardian Trap (here and now 3/3).

Globalisation and Neoliberalism: The Ricardian Trap

1. The Promise of Ricardo
The theory of comparative advantage says each country should specialise in what it does best (this is not dissimilar to OTOP : one tambon one product) then trade freely across borders. Everyone doing what their best at was supposed to make everyone richer, creating efficiency, innovation, and cheaper goods for all of us.


2. From Promise to Practice
However, in practice, globalisation and neoliberalism took Ricardo’s idea and ran with them just a bit too far.

  • Capital, goods, and people flowed without restraint. Take people. Immigration is a great answer to shortages of labour. Labour shortest years might arrives for demographic reasons or simply because there is a growing demand that the producer can no longer meet. But hey wait a moment, what do the native peoples, the Host population, think of this? What do they think of piling up foreign cultures religions languages ... different cultures ... all into their living space?
  • What happens if manufacturing jobs are shut down in a rich country because it's cheaper to ship the work abroad to low cost labor countries what happens to the work traditionally done by local people?
  • And what happens to the wages of local people if they're now in competition with migrants? Wages stagnate
  • Look at capital flows the work has gone abroad and with it the prophets but the reserve currency is a reserve currency used for international trade where will a foreign company or government store it's wealth maybe not in its local currency which is depreciating against the dollar they will want to store it in us treasuries that added demand is going to raise the price on us treasuries and asset values generally. So foreign demand for treasuries, corporate bonds, equities, real estate... raises asset prices eg the cost of a home goes up beyond a a price local people can afford. Those lucky enough to already own assets see those values go up while those without have only debt increasing debt.
  • Deficits widen, debt balloons, and societies became more unequal - it was so easy to borrow or print so much easier than raising taxes.

The winners were global corporations, financiers, and the very small proportion of the population who seriously owned assets. The losers were the workers in industrial economies who saw their purchasing power drop decade after decade.


3. The American Collapse
The US embraced this model most fully. You can see how it shifted from production to consumption, and from industry to finance - I would call this papering over the debts Twin deficits (trade and budget) became structural, debt piled up, and the reserve currency status only encouraged fiscal and monitoring irresponsibility. What began as Ricardo’s elegant logic ended in de-industrialisation and imperial overreach.


4. Singapore’s Escape Route
Singapore is at an early stage of the debt cycle. It could follow the US path — financialisation, overvaluation, complacency, hubris — or it could chart a smarter course.

  • Protect industrial capacity.
  • Invest in productivity and innovation.
  • Resist easy debt and speculative bubbles.
  • Stay neutral in geopolitics.
This means basically pursuing cooperation in a spirit of respect with your neighbours and certainly don't get involved in any military adventurism - that would be a route that leads to debt, death and immiseration even if it might plump up the assets of the elite before the finish.

Conclusion
Globalisation promised prosperity through Ricardo’s "comparative advantage". Neoliberalism turned that promise into a trap. America fell into it. Britain before it too. Singapore now faces the same choice: repeat the cycle, or stay small, stay smart, stay productive.



2/3 CAN SINGAPORE AVOID THE RESERVE CURRENCY CURSE

26 September 2025

How Singapore could avoid the "exhorbitant priviledges of being a Local Reserve Currency Hub 


Early in the Debt Cycle

Singapore’s position today resembles the U.S.’s back in the early post-WWII decades: a trusted, stable, export-driven economy that others are happy to hold their monetary reserves in. But if it follows the same path unchecked, it risks repeating the late-stage debt cycle consequences we saw in Britain in1949 and now see in America.

Here’s what Singapore might be considering 

To avoid the pitfalls of being a local reserve currency, Singapore could:

1. Maintain Trade Surpluses and Real-World Competitiveness

• Singapore wants to resist the temptation to let its currency over-appreciate purely to meet reserve currency demand - not for trade / transactional reasons. All that this excess demand would do is to push-up asset prices. And this would favor those who have assets and not the majority who have mostly debt - thus exacerbating inequality and creating mounting social instability.

Singapore doesn't want this.

Continue investing in high-value exports, 

Like advanced manufacturing, biotech, and green technologies, 

• And limit foreign purely speculative investment flows into government treasuries 

or corporate bonds, or stocks and shares, or its real estate.

Gear industrial policy towards productivity and innovation

Taking care to avoid asset price inflation – ie controls to stop capital being disinvested from industrial and revested into financial assets. This is the planning and regulation behind sensible industrial policy, where the state focuses on the sectors of the economy it wishes to  promote. 

2. Lesson from the U.S

America shifted from manufacturing to services too early and too aggressively. Why? 

Ricardian economics

Globalisation / neoliberalism, it's about the free movement of capital, goods and services, and people, each country specialises in what it produces most efficiently, and trades with the others without respect for borders, in the interests of efficiency.

While the larger markets so created, offer economies of scale, innovation and finally cheaper goods for consumers.

Globalisation. In pracrise, this meant outsourcing manufacturing jobs to countries where labour was cheaper

Growing twin deficits as America began to run a trade deficit, importing the things it no longer made at home; the profits generated by surplus countries were sent back into American treasuries for safety; it now became so easy for America to borrow and live on debt; this trade deficit was followed by "fiscal irresponsibility" is it with so much easier to borrow and print if necessary when you are the reserve currency rather than balance the books. This is what is bankrupting America.

Singapore doesn't want this either.

2. Control Financialisation and Protect the Real Economy

• Prevent the financial sector from becoming too large relative to GDP, a common symptom of reserve currency status

• Regulate speculative capital inflows and real estate bubbles as above – don’t let asset prices overtake wage growth, at the risk of loss of purchasing power inequality and in stage revolt by the people. 

Inflation is mostly the result of monetary expansion. Pegging the currency in some way to the price of gold or a basket of commodities wood restrain money printing because each dollar note is a promise to pay and that means it can be exchanged for gold but if you print there won't be enough gold in the Vault and ultimately you will have to dealing as Nixon did in 1971.

• Encourage long-term investment in productive enterprises, companies that make real things that people want - these will keep pace with any inflation because demand are in and supply are in balance ie not just paper assets - these are speculative such as derivatives options even the secondary market what do they add to the quality of life for real people?

This is where an industrial policy with tax and subsidy incentives, possibly even tariffs, could provide an answer.

Lesson from the UK

The City of London gained power at the expense of the Midlands and North - a cautionary tale. Watch the video linked above.

3. Strengthen Fiscal Discipline Without Falling Into Austerity

• Avoid easy borrowing just because foreign investors are eager to hold SGD or Singaporean bonds 
• Use surpluses and sovereign wealth (e.g. GIC and Temasek) strategically - means invest counter-cyclically, let the government support innovation, and cushion downturns using money saved during upturns
• Maintain low public debt levels to ensure flexibility in crises and especially at times of Higher interest rates avoiding interest eating into government Revenue. Singapore's debt is mostly non-tradable and domestic, which is a good non speculative buffer.

4. Promote Regional Multipolarity, Not Dominance

• As a local reserve currency in Southeast Asia, Singapore would be best off facilitating balanced trade, not dominating it.
• Work with ASEAN, China, and India to create a resilient multi-currency, multi-polar region.
• Encourage the use of local currency settlement mechanisms such as QRIS, rather than forcing all flows through SGD.

Reserve status breeds resentment if it becomes coercive. Singapore wants cooperative credibility - peace and prosperity matter more than dominance.

5. Build Financial Firewalls: Capital Controls and Macroprudential Tools

• Stay alert to hot money inflows and be ready to impose temporary capital controls or taxes on speculative flows. Speculators will run a mile at the thought of capital controls locking in their money.
• Maintain counter-cyclical buffers (like MAS’s policy tools) to dampen boom-bust cycles.
• Enforce strict property lending and banking regulation to avoid credit excess.

Singapore's history of pre-emptive tightening (e.g. cooling property markets) is a model to stick to.

6. Avoid U.S.-Style Geopolitical Overreach

• One of the reasons the U.S. mismanaged its reserve status is imperial overreach: policing the world for dominance and to control the flow of resources by coercion rather than Commerce. This kind of overreach means neglecting its domestic base.
• Singapore must resist aligning too closely with any one great power and especially avoid militarising its regional role these two are not in contradiction necessarily.

So best to stay a neutral, rules-based trading hub, not a junior partner in someone else’s hegemonic rivalry.... and that's what Singapore is doing.

Conclusion

Singapore can enjoy the benefits of regional reserve currency status without the late-stage downsides seen in the U.S., if it avoids the traps of over-financialisation ie finance overtaking manufacturing as a percent of GDP), currency overvaluation (from trade deficits where foreign profits are invested in deep and safe Singapore assets) and especially avoid the intangible geopolitical hubris that makes you think you're always right and deaf to the criticism of others.

It should aim to be a stable, modest, industrial-financial hybrid, not a financialised empire. In short:

Stay small, stay smart, stay productive

That’s how Singapore could outlast the cycle that for America is ending in the fourth turning.


Wednesday, 24 September 2025

PALESTINE - A GOVERNMENT IN EXILE IN ITS OWN COUNTRY

24 September 2025

Short polemical post on an absurd injustice created by colonial hypocrisy where land was promised by people who didn't own it and given or rather taken by another who weren't living rhere, without any regard for the native people who actually inhabited the region.


A Government in Exile in Its Own Country

Recognition of Palestine by Britain, France and others has created one of the strangest paradoxes in modern politics. The Palestinian Authority in Ramallah is now the recognised government of Palestine. But in reality, Hamas controls Gaza, running the streets, the police, and the ministries with near 100% support from the citizens of this newly-created state.

Normally, a government-in-exile rules from abroad: the Free French in London, the Poles during the war, Tibet in India, the Kuomintang (Republic of China) in Formosa. 

But here is something new. Hamas is not abroad. It is on its own land and it holds territory, it commands loyalty and it exercises power, but it has no legitimacy in the eyes of the international system and is condemned as a terrorist state. 

And while the West recognises Palestine (rather late in the day) yet it still continues to supply arms to Palestine's adversary, bent on its destruction. That's rather more than irony, that is a cruel and murderous hypocrisy.

Meanwhile, the PA has the opposite problem: it enjoys recognition, has seats at the UN, and gets assistance from European chancelleries, but has little control or legitimacy on the ground.

This must be a first in world history:

- a government-in-exile that never left home

- a state that gets recognition from the West who nonetheless is focused on its destruction.


Which of the following best sum up the situation?:

 “A land without a people for a people without a land".

 "A land promised by those who did not own it, to those who did not live in it, taken from those who inhabited it".

 Palestine today is ruled by a government with territory but no recognition, and another with recognition but no territory.

 With one hand they recognise Palestine and with the other they destroy it.

 A government in exile in its own country.

[End]

1/3 TRIFFIN’S DILEMMA

24 September 2025


TRIFFIN’S DILEMMA

Contents

• Dollar as domestic currency vs dollar as global currency
• Triffin’s Dilemma
• Fiscal deficits
• Dollar Milkshake Theory
• Gold
• Liquidity vs credit vs capital
• Lessons from history

The Dollar Trap

Why America Can’t Stop Feeding the World with Its Own Debt

Let’s start with a simple observation: the dollar is both America’s national currency and the world’s reserve currency. That double role sounds glorious, but it is also the root cause of the mess we’re in today.

Back in 1944, at Bretton Woods, Keynes proposed a neutral global currency, the Bancor. America refused it. Fresh from the war, owning half the world’s gold and producing half its GDP, Washington seized the opportunity for global power and insisted on making the US dollar the centre of global trade. The dollar carried the glory, the prestige... and the burden.

America refused with good reason - after all, if the world adopted the bancor, it would mean the participating countries losing some of their sovereignty over monetary policy since they would have to adjust their currencies to trade imbalances. This would not just take away their sovereignty but would also - impractical terms - be a slow cumbersome bureaucratic and expensive new institution with all its rules.

So America rejected this suggestion for political economic and practical reasons and chose to insist on the dollar as the world’s reserve currency for the exorbitant priviledge of power it would give America over other nations.

However ...

Triffin’s Dilemma

Enter Robert Triffin, an economist writing in 1960. He spotted the contradiction.

For the world to have enough dollars for trade and reserves, America would have to run deficits, buying more from abroad than it sold, and issuing mountains of Treasuries for foreigners to hold. That supplied liquidity to the world, but gradually eviscerated America’s own economy.

Deficits mean debt

Debt means ever more borrowing.
And ever more borrowing ultimately undermines faith in the dollar itself.
It’s a treadmill: the US can’t stop running deficits without starving the world of dollars. But running deficits forever makes the whole system fragile.... look at where Britain finished in 1949, and America is following exactly the same path:


Dollars at Home, Dollars Abroad

Here’s the contradiction. When America spends more than it earns, it looks reckless at home — “fiscal irresponsibility”. Abroad, though, those deficits are welcomed, because they’re the only way the world gets the dollars it needs for trade, savings, and foreign reserves.

So every dollar of US debt is both:
• A domestic liability, and
• A global asset.
That’s the contradiction of being the issuer of the reserve currency.

Capital, Credit, Liquidity

It helps to distinguish three key items:
• Capital: the wealth itself - factories, land, savings.
• Credit: borrowed money - IOUs, loans, bonds.
• Liquidity: how quickly something can be turned into cash without materially affecting the open market price.

Most of what we call “money” today is really credit: promises to pay in the future. Gold is different. As J.P. Morgan said in 1912: “Gold is money. Everything else is credit”. With gold there’s no counterparty and so no counterparty risk

That’s why in ancient Rome, a senator’s fine toga cost about an ounce of gold - and today, a US senator’s fine suit costs the same. Gold has preserved value across two thousand years - it's the other credit Fiat currencies that have lost their purchasing power, their value.

The Dollar Milkshake

Now enter Brent Johnson’s colourful metaphor. Think of the global financial system as a milkshake that is full of capital, credit and liquidity. The straw is the US dollar.
When crisis hits, investors suck dollars out of the system:

• Because $13 trillion of offshore debts were borrowed in dollars and must be repaid in dollars
• Because US Treasuries are (were) the ultimate safe haven
• Because in panic, everyone wants what everyone else will accept.

This demand drives the dollar up, sometimes violently. The DXY index could soar to 120–122 ( it’s at 97 - 98 today). In that moment, even gold can collapse — sold off to raise dollars.

But that spike is unsustainable. Once the Fed intervenes by having to vastly expand the money supply M2 (with rate cuts, QE, debt monetisation, operation twist ...), trust in the dollar cracks, and investors switch to the one money with no counterparty risk: gold. That’s when gold rallies explosively.

So both arguments are right: the dollar soars first, then collapses — and gold wins in the end.

The Cost of Being the World’s Banker

Why does this matter now? Because America’s deficits are swelling and have been on and off since it abandoned the gold standard. Lawmakers don’t have to run deficits, but the system almost compels it:

• The world demands US treasuries
 Wall Street demands collateral for loans
 And politicians find deficits more palatable than tax hikes.

It works — until it doesn’t. Debt piles up, interest costs balloon, inequality widens, manufacturing shrinks, and American middle class voters feel poorer. The dollar’s glory abroad translates into populism at home.

The Lesson

Keynes foresaw the trap. Triffin diagnosed it. And today we live inside it.

The US dollar is a lifeline to international trade but at the same time, a time bomb:

• Lifeline, because the world runs on it
• Time bomb, because the very deficits that supply dollars abroad undermine the system’s foundations.

And as history shows, all empires eventually stumble and fall when their financial contradictions overwhelm them.

The toga, the suit, and the ounce of gold remind us that mere promises to pay are fragile. Money that stands on its own - gold - sees empires come and go.

Next: how to avoid Triffin's Dilemma - the case of Singapore.

Monday, 22 September 2025

THE STATE OF THE EMPIRE

22 September 2025

This article discusses the increasingly strident communications across different media - independent media and more and more mainstream too - on the state of the The Western Alliance, or "The Empire" if you prefer, ie America, Europe, The West broadly and the UK specifically.

1. Economic Exhaustion

The system is showing its age. Debt piles grow ever higher, competitiveness drains away, growth is minimal and zero in real terms, inflation threatens, new technologies are emerging elsewhere. What was once a confident, industrial manufacturing economy now seems tired and sluggish, once foreigners bought up its assets to safely store their wealth - government and corporate bonds, equities, quality real estate - but now governments and investors are losing confidence in western economies and currencies. Meanwhile, other nations outside the West are coordinating and leaping forward.

2. Social Strain

Inequalities deepen. Ordinary people feel left behind. Neighbours are on the streets, either in protest or in poverty. Immigration adds further pressure, feeding the breakdown in cohesion and pushing voters into the arms of populist parties considered extreme by mainstream politicians. The social contract is fraying and near breaking point.

3. Political Instability

Leadership changes come thick and fast. Prime ministers come and go amongst derision from the people as they fail in their missions. Public trust ebbs away. And behind it all, financial markets - the “bond vigilantes” - dictate terms, forcing governments to cut and retrench. We wonder who is really in charge, who is pushing for war and preventing global issues from being resolved?

4. Geopolitical Weakness

Across the globe, Western nations and the Empire appear diminished. In Ukraine, a nuclear superpower checks the West's eastward  expansion, in the Middle East America and Israel cannot control the fires they have started, in East Asia America is considering advice to withdraw to the second island ring whilst simultaneously planning for a war over Taiwan in 2027. Meanwhile members of the global South / BRICS are working together on their futures. 

Globalisation is reversing, the West is withdrawing, abandoning efficiency and integration, looking instead for security and resilience at home. Across the Atlantic, Washington lords it over its allies, Britain humiliatingly obeys, a client state in all but name. The people know that their leaders no longer serve national interests. Across the Channel, the UK’s economic ties still bind it to Europe, yet it has no voice at the table.

5. The Loss of Liberty

Here lies the most bitter irony. As citizens grow restless, taking to the streets to voice their anger, governments respond with careless force. Police patrol not only public squares but the private spaces of digital life. Social media posts are monitored, words are policed, and freedoms once taken for granted are curbed in the name of order and security. The state strengthens itself while weakening the liberty of those it claims to protect. They seem pre-programmed, these LPMs - Large Policing Models - trained on decades of demonstrations since the 1960s. Case in point - these two young police women seem lifeless, inhuman, critically un self-aware robotic:


6. The Fourth Turning Mood

The result is a society adrift: tired in economy, divided in society, unstable in politics, in retreat abroad, and ever more heavy-handed at home. The rule of law is disrespected by governments themselves, institutions are creaking, trust collapsing. Citizens mock and despise those who rule them but who can no longer protect them. This is what Strauss and Howe called the Fourth Turning - a moment of reckoning when the old globalist order can no longer hold out against the demands of its citizens for national sovereignty and personal freedom - leaders who will defend our nation are identity and our culture.

7. How will it all end - Reform, Revolution or War

If the state is unable to reform itself to reflect changes in the world around it (there are multiple centres of power rising these days, you cannot wacamole them all, progress will be through negotiation abroad and respect for one's own citizens at home) then the citizens will eventually step in to remove them from power; or the risk is that the state puts its country and its citizens into war with its neighbours, to distract from the mess at home for which it is responsible but for which it is unable to execute a strategy of reform.